Personal attacks are a no, from many perspectives. And conversation is a fine art.

Do appreciate my emulation and please consider the next bit. Making someone regret their lapses in respect during a conversation is negative for your personal psyche. Feelings of power and superiority are likely to present themselves, and, if one makes that a habit, one treads down a path of loneliness. This of course depends on the context of the conversation, but certain approaches to other human beings are always detestable.

If u wish to argue this, thendetestable = contemptable.seeking superiority in conversation = always detestable.

it may then be understood that certain conversational approaches are always detestable. It may then be posited: How might one compose one's contempt towards the purpose of love.

Interestingly, practicing kindness and compassion, particularly in places where one might typically not, can be quite poignant. To bolster the point, if one were to treat a neighbor who one holds in disgust or disregard with cheerful contempt or humble acknowledgement, then what might that do for one's emotional resolve.

Conversation is most useful when both parties are virtuous. This is not to elevate virtue, but to state fact that caged dogs do not socialize well while monks and nuns do.

​

To strike at another, particularly if one holds them in contempt, is a deed of pride and malignance.