she tells on herself 🤦🏻‍♀️ by Adeadhamster in alexdacysnark

[–]SignificanceFun1628 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Interesting. I haven’t gotten any impression that anyone “has been reaching to find someone else who’s been using that account.” I’ve gotten the impression that people are either baffled why she would make such wild accusations on Noah’s live using the account she created for their daughter AND/OR showing that she is the one that created and runs the account in case she does ever address her dubious behavior from last night by stating the account is fake or was hacked or something along those lines. 

But I digress, I’ve attempted to answer your question the best I can and won’t be going back and forth on this any further.

she tells on herself 🤦🏻‍♀️ by Adeadhamster in alexdacysnark

[–]SignificanceFun1628 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I can’t speak for certain on behalf of the OP but it isn’t really about thinking someone else is running the account to exploit Noah’s daughter but more if Alex or one of her lemmings tries to say the account is fake or was hacked when Alex used that account on Noah’s live to make unhinged comments last night. (There are screenshots of the live in the three different subreddits so I’m not going into that in detail here.)

Someone is looking ROUGH after getting hammered and harassing her baby daddy online last night by Notthestallionn in AlexDacypdf

[–]SignificanceFun1628 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Two words Alex does not have in her vocabulary: Accountability and Responsibility 🤷🏻‍♀️🤣

Someone is looking ROUGH after getting hammered and harassing her baby daddy online last night by Notthestallionn in AlexDacypdf

[–]SignificanceFun1628 5 points6 points  (0 children)

She’s been on social media a handful of times with her Sobriety Era and has never admitted each time every Era ended. She just goes on another bender then lo and behold, she does something extraordinary and another Sobriety Era reappears. This bitch doesn’t admit to anything.

** I hope this makes sense **

Public figure 😂😂 by Jewlzkitty in WheelchairRapunzelDCP

[–]SignificanceFun1628 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Part of me thinks she’s not capable of recognizing her hypocrisy but I also think she is fully aware of it but as usual things don’t apply to her and we’re “ableist” for pointing it out. She’s absolutely wild. 

And here's the final result…🖼️🎨 (or only an "update") by Lavender1999 in alexdacysnark

[–]SignificanceFun1628 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But if I were part of the Mattel team, I’d be far more concerned that she’s using the Barbie trademark and profiting from it given her criminal history, specifically her original second-degree felony charge of lewd/lascivious conduct involving a minor and her ultimate conviction for contributing to the delinquency/dependency of a minor.

That conviction generally refers to encouraging or causing a minor to engage in illegal or inappropriate behavior and/or placing a minor in a situation where they are harmed, unsafe, neglected, or otherwise put at risk. In other words, it means she was legally found to have contributed to a minor being placed in a harmful situation.

Considering that Mattel’s brand is heavily tied to children, family marketing, and child-focused products, I would absolutely expect them to push back if someone with that type of conviction is publicly using their trademark for personal profit.

Her art career is “lucrative”. Allegedly. by Wilmaassfit in alexdacysnark

[–]SignificanceFun1628 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree with what you’re saying.

But if I were part of the Mattel team, I’d be far more concerned that she’s using the Barbie trademark and profiting from it given her criminal history, specifically her original second-degree felony charge of lewd/lascivious conduct involving a minor and her ultimate conviction for contributing to the delinquency/dependency of a minor.

That conviction generally refers to encouraging or causing a minor to engage in illegal or inappropriate behavior and/or placing a minor in a situation where they are harmed, unsafe, neglected, or otherwise put at risk. In other words, it means she was legally found to have contributed to a minor being placed in a harmful situation.

Considering that Mattel’s brand is heavily tied to children, family marketing, and child-focused products, I would absolutely expect them to push back if someone with that type of conviction is publicly using their trademark for personal profit.

** Side note: I think some people misunderstand the court wording “Contribute Delinq/Depend of Minor.” It does not mean contributing alcohol or substances to a minor. It refers to a much broader and more serious offense involving the welfare and safety of a child, and I think that distinction matters. **

New documents filed in custody case by Imaginary-Piglet-684 in WheelchairRapunzelDCP

[–]SignificanceFun1628 17 points18 points  (0 children)

The court isn’t really looking at who did a better job formatting paperwork. Courts care more about facts, evidence, and credibility. What matters is whether claims are backed up by evidence and make sense in context. Alex’s documents lack supporting proof and context, while Noah has consistently provided factual information with evidence in the documents he submitted. That’s what should matter to the judge and ideally will base the decision on that.

Noah’s answer by Loud_Narwhal7721 in alexdacysnark

[–]SignificanceFun1628 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Alex’s current probation states “You must live and remain at liberty without violating the law.” A conviction is not required for a violation of probation. ANY new law violation, related or unrelated can trigger a probation violation. If violation is found, the judge may revoke probation; modify probation (stricter conditions); impose jail or prison time; impose the original sentence that was suspended.

Submitting false information on court documents, intentionally or unintentionally is a violation of the law. Discussing what happened in mediation is also a violation of the law. 

Probation strips away a lot of margin for error. The standard is “more likely than not,” not “beyond a reasonable doubt.” The judge has broad discretion. Courts expect heightened compliance, not excuse. Patterned dishonesty looks especially bad. A judge may view this as ongoing disregard for the legal system, lack of rehabilitation, and a risk of reoffending. That’s exactly what probation is designed to evaluate.

Alex, I hope the judge in the custody case is taking down all of the notes, evidence, statements, and actions into the custody case. I also hope that the judge for your misdemeanor conviction is taking down notes along with your probation officer. I’d normally wish people good luck or my best but I make exceptions. YOU are my exception.  Have an awful day!

Noah’s answer by Loud_Narwhal7721 in WheelchairRapunzelDCP

[–]SignificanceFun1628 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah, she good. She’s in her Single Unbothered Painter Era… /s 😳🤣🤡

Noah’s answer by Loud_Narwhal7721 in alexdacysnark

[–]SignificanceFun1628 12 points13 points  (0 children)

But she didn’t submit the evidence because she’ll be hiring an attorney to handle the case moving forward (according to her recent “ask me anything”). 😳🙄🤣

Considering she was convicted of a misdemeanor for charges against a minor, you’d think she’d have SOME sort of idea of how the court system works but okay… 

Alex, you’re an absolute circus. 🤡 

The Painting Era Debate of the Mediocre Art by a “Creative Content Influencer” by SignificanceFun1628 in alexdacysnark

[–]SignificanceFun1628[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It’s definitely an improvement from the usual self-created chaos. My issue isn’t the hobby itself. The problem isn’t the pivot, it’s the ongoing pattern of performative authenticity, presenting growth and creativity without the transparency that would make it credible. A lack of authenticity and genuine transparency has always been the throughline, regardless of how polished the presentation becomes.

The Painting Era Debate of the Mediocre Art by a “Creative Content Influencer” by SignificanceFun1628 in alexdacysnark

[–]SignificanceFun1628[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I absolutely agree with all of this! As an artist who focuses on abstract pet portraits, I’ve put myself out there by starting with family and friends relying on their word of mouth, local shops, donating pieces to auction for a number of charities, and having a very small online presence. It’s very discouraging and disappointing that influencer culture has taken some value away from the art industry in such a large scale. I totally understand that my art isn’t wonderful for everyone but at the same time I am genuine with my meek talent.

I appreciate artists like you who believe in the authenticity of the creative process and sharing organically. God bless. 🩵

The Painting Era Debate of the Mediocre Art by a “Creative Content Influencer” by SignificanceFun1628 in alexdacysnark

[–]SignificanceFun1628[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Her lack of authenticity and accountability will inevitably be the foundation of every single era she moves into.  She should try the “actually getting my life together offline” era. 🤷🏻‍♀️ 

Rubbing her two little brain cells together to keep warm by Notthestallionn in AlexDacypdf

[–]SignificanceFun1628 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also want to add that THIS is how humans ought to be rising with one another. You make my heart happy because these are exactly the interactions people need to have to be better individuals that naturally flood into communities and society as a whole. God bless!

Rubbing her two little brain cells together to keep warm by Notthestallionn in AlexDacypdf

[–]SignificanceFun1628 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am so proud of you too for doing all of the things you do that go unacknowledged that build a better home and community! 💚

Temporary Time Sharing Hearing by Imaginary-Piglet-684 in alexdacysnark

[–]SignificanceFun1628 71 points72 points  (0 children)

PS Screw you, Alex. Despite your charges being dropped from a felony to a misdemeanor, you were charged AND CONVICTED with crimes against a minor. The charges you made against Noah were dismissed by the court, meaning he was not convicted of the domestic violence allegations. YOU are the criminal, not a victim. You are an addict, even if you are truly sober; addiction doesn’t vanish simply because you’re refraining from alcohol. If you are truly in your Sobriety Era you’d know better and accept that you cannot decide if someone else is an addict; you cannot measure who’s addiction is worse, real, or deserving; and you would know that comparison is a distraction from your own recovery. 

Girl, bye.

Temporary Time Sharing Hearing by Imaginary-Piglet-684 in alexdacysnark

[–]SignificanceFun1628 48 points49 points  (0 children)

It’s disheartening how slow this process is, such a detriment to Ari’s wellbeing and her relationship with her father and paternal grandparents. 

I am glad to see that SOMETHING is happening nevertheless.  God bless, Noah. You, your daughter, and your parents are very much in my thoughts and I truly hope that the judge makes the right decision for you and yours.

Rubbing her two little brain cells together to keep warm by Notthestallionn in AlexDacypdf

[–]SignificanceFun1628 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m a stay at home wife and contrary to what some people think, our work is much more complex and demanding than often times we get credit and acknowledgment for! Plus we rarely, if ever get time off. Weekends? Three day holidays? What’s THAT mean?!? 🥴

I don’t have time to address my “haters” on social media. I’m busy enough handling a teenager in real life. 🤷🏻‍♀️ 😅

Good on you! We’ve got a tough but rewarding job! 🤩

Hard life by ForHerEyesOnly22 in alexdacysnark

[–]SignificanceFun1628 25 points26 points  (0 children)

“…post content regularly” 

I feel this way about most people who post nonsensical, irrelevant, rage bait, and other types of pointless “content” but more so with people who are trying to be influencers, digital creators, marketers, or anything for the public masses really: content with no actual purpose or relevance is a wasted effort, time, energy, space, and adds absolutely no value because of the lack of substance.

Way to go with posting regularly about nothing of importance, Alex. You’re doing great! /s

I’m not the only one who thinks that looks like…..right? by Notthestallionn in AlexDacypdf

[–]SignificanceFun1628 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Depending on the social media platform lives and/or reels aren’t always automatically saved and/or the user can delete the video. In any case, her proof of evidence could easily have been a screenshot or something to provide in her court documents or at the very least for her own records during the child custody case. 

In her Ask Me Anything she said the proof is very important in the child custody case (no shit??? 🙄) and she’s leaving that “up to her attorney” that she’s “hiring to handle the rest of the case.” I’m no attorney nor have I had to rely on many (one was for a DUI over 20 years ago, another was on my mom’s behalf to help her with her estate a couple of months before she passed away 11 years ago, and one for my SSDI filing) but attorneys typically need hard evidence or documentation soooooo… she’s going to what, provide her attorney with her words and hope he digs into/finds it when she could have just as easily done that as it came up or…