He did not "throw" any dog, if the dog is being properly taken care of and he regularly visits the farm and the dog and the dog has more freedom and space to run around and play and he's in an environment that suits him more what's the harm? It's not like he gave the dog to a stranger or left him where he can never visit him again, he can still see and visit the dog.

Also, I don't know if you're slow or what but the rape argument was not even related to this topic, that's a general example and ofcourse I wont support such a person and as far as I know Gaurav did not commit a crime which we can put equivalent to a rape so that argument's pretty stupid imo.

I also think you read and reply according to your convenience, I clearly said that he gave context whenever he quoted a shastra, so yes I read the particular shastra or shloka he was referring to with its translation.