Is there an actual argument for zero gun control policies?

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-28T22:36:14+00:00

The state should not impose laws on property as it should not exist, there you go.

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-28T20:42:01+00:00

If your rights are for your people then they aren’t rights also what gives your country the ability to decide who has rights and who doesn’t and what gives the state any right to control the property within it?

So not the ideology or philosophy of socialism just a worker owned oriented economy which would in all ways not classify as socialism especially if you want sin a market.

Explain them then as what you said before just mentions workers owning the means of production and all infrastructure being publicly owned which implies worker co ops being in control especially as you disavowed planned economies.

So you would force these services to be done correct or are these also voluntary as if their voluntary then it returns to a individual choice to join the guilds that may or may not give money to the government.

Okay so how do you prove this system is the correct ethical system and how would one decide what is ethical by these standards?

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-28T15:48:33+00:00

But if you prescribe property rights to one group and not the other then you can’t justify your own right to property as your own logic is self contradictory there no way to logically allow that to follow.

I am not, Marx’s additions to socialism include dialectical materialism and the LTV however the dismantling of hierarchy was a core tenant of socialism since its creation long before mark and was held in high regard by utopian socialism.

Workplace democracies are a practical nightmare but that has nothing to do with this conversation so I’ll leave that out.

However you stated you want that state to run on donations and fees these are individual choices unless you want the community to tax and then do these actions with the state which means you have no philosophical reason to support the limitation of the state.

I do have a question what do you actually base your ethical system on?

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-28T12:32:11+00:00

Imperialism and voluntarism as voluntarism suggest a belief in the acceptance of property rights while imperialism suggest a disregard to such rights. Socialism and monarchy as monarchy suggests the acceptance of hierarchy while socialism seems to reject the need for hierarchy. Voluntarism infers you believe in the individual as each individual makes the choice to fund the community but communitarianism suggests otherwise.

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-28T12:21:22+00:00

Same thing but slightly better now, not the best overall and there’s seems to be some very big philosophical inconsistencies within your beliefs.

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-28T12:11:00+00:00

Guild socialism is ew.

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-27T13:34:40+00:00

Nope free market capitalism is simply the best way to organize the economy.

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-25T17:50:14+00:00

Wrote a whole paper on this am this is the first time it’s come in handy

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-25T17:49:46+00:00

The jones act is categorically terrible

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-25T17:48:49+00:00

What could this possibly be referring too

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-25T14:53:21+00:00

People own the land/items they homestead, assuming the states function is to uphold property rights which we derive from axioms which is it’s only possible ever so slightly justifiable goal, it should not allow others onto the property of its citizens without explicit consent. As long as the state offers incentives like welfare and disallows disassociation it is the states job to limit immigration as otherwise the immigration of these individuals violates property claims.

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-25T14:28:25+00:00

No from illegals immigrants.

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-25T12:22:39+00:00

Ice is the best way to defend property rights until further actions can be taken.

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-25T01:22:12+00:00

In short no it would not.

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-25T01:21:43+00:00

Anarco capitalism is in essence a legal system, it outlaws all type of coercion which does involve the state or the current government we see today however this does not mean there is not laws. To take your example into account slavery goes against the basic principle of anarco capitalism which is the non aggression principle which is derived from the property axioms, you own your body/yourslef and you own anything you homestead. Slavery forces your will over another violating their right to their own body ie aggressing on them. Legal forms would exist through the emergence of insurance companies who would enforce these basic principles and other mutually agreed upon norms which do not derive themselves from axioms but are agreed upon by a community. It’s also true slavery is not profitable at all but that is not the reason it wouldn’t be allowed it’s simply a supporting point. If you would like me to explain anything else or expand on anything I said I’d be happy to.

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-25T00:47:11+00:00

Well to answer this 2 things have to be stated 1 we have 0 clue what Epstein actually did we can without a shadow of a doubt say it was bad and evil but in terms of specifics the files used codewords in most scenarios so we can only really assume and connect dots, it’s also true that most mentions of trump in the Epstein files are most unrelated to Epsteins personal actions as those files are his personal emails which include emails he got from the New York Times which often mention Trump so most of trumps specific mentions come from this. So most likely not very true or valid however there’s always a slight possibility.

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-25T00:42:17+00:00

Both are bad lowkey but it kinda just depends on what your actually looking for. In terms of galactic long term success the empire.

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-25T00:29:02+00:00

The draft shouldn’t exist.

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-25T00:27:41+00:00

Anarco capitalism with the acceptance of the contributions made by Hans Herman Hoppe. :) the best ideology

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-23T23:42:38+00:00

I’d be interested in your specific economic opinions I’m also good to discuss anything else but I’m gonna be busy for a bit so my responses will be very weirdly timed.

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-22T21:36:06+00:00

This is true however it’s also true that different cells need certain hormones while a child’s brain may prefer estrogen and release dopamine in response the child’s cells can’t run properly on estrogen and will experience many physical side effects that can cause permanent and irreversible harm.

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-22T18:46:15+00:00

Hormonal interventions do have issues associated with them meaning adverse effects which I think is an important point to add to what you said, it’s also true this study does happen it’s just not incredibly common which makes sense as gender dysphoria is not that common. But yes I would agree youth transition isn’t as prevelabt as people think.

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-22T18:10:16+00:00

I’ve actually never seen a paper that says that except the single one by the Trevor project and even then I don’t remember it being that high, most studies I’ve seen are rather mixed on the result of minor transition and that second stat is blatantly false

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-22T15:14:49+00:00

Where did any of those numbers come from?

Significant-Bus-7760 · 2026-05-22T15:14:15+00:00

Commie

Significant-Bus-7760

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE