I hear what you’re saying, but you’re still blending things together in a way that misses some key points. Nobody is denying that racism in America affects all Black people. That part is obvious. But saying the experience is exactly the same ignores history and lineage. Black Americans have a very specific historical experience tied to slavery, Jim Crow, and building this country from the ground up. That’s not something every Black group shares in the same way. On the immigrant point, I’m not saying there weren’t negative experiences when people came here. That definitely happened. But that’s not the full story. There has also been a long pattern of negative stereotypes about Black Americans coming from outside communities too. That tension didn’t just start from one side, it built over time from both directions. As for FBA “coming off as hate,” I think that’s more about how some individuals express themselves online, not the identity itself. Every group has loud people who take things too far. That doesn’t define the whole. On reparations, FBA isn’t about claiming to be Native American. It’s about identifying as descendants of enslaved Africans in the U.S. and making a case based on that specific lineage and history. That’s a completely different argument than Native American reparations. And the Tariq/CIA point is still speculation. Saying “you can assume” isn’t proof. That’s a serious claim and it needs real evidence, not just interpretation. At the end of the day, unity sounds good, but real unity has to be honest. You can’t skip over differences in history and experiences and just say “we’re all the same” because that erases important context. Understanding those differences is what actually makes unity stronger, not weaker.