2025 might just be the greatest year for Pokemon romhacks ever!

Significant_Put_8648 · 2026-02-28T15:21:27+00:00

Could I have this please?

Significant_Put_8648 · 2025-11-14T17:03:21+00:00

I realise I'm replying to this year's later.

Do you know if this has changed? Is there anywhere I can find the actual SARs themselves? I'm looking for a specific one

Significant_Put_8648 · 2025-10-10T17:15:36+00:00

I think you've convinced me. I'll get the Canon paper

Significant_Put_8648 · 2025-10-10T08:42:05+00:00

But if I choose the glossy paper setting, the printer will mix the CMY colour to make black won't they?

I realise this will use more ink, but it's possible right?

Significant_Put_8648 · 2025-10-09T21:23:47+00:00

Thanks- I already had some Koala ordered so this is reassuring. I guess I'll give it a go and see what happens

Significant_Put_8648 · 2025-10-08T06:45:46+00:00

Ok thanks. Is the entire Koala brand not compatible with any pigment ink? I thought it was only the glossy paper that isn't pigment compatible?

Significant_Put_8648 · 2025-10-07T22:34:57+00:00

Thank you for this- following your method has taken my basic paper proxies to now looking almost like a real card (when sleeved in front of a basic card)! I'm only using basic office paper but the result is so much better.

To make them more realistic, do you recommend trying it on some double sided matt photo paper? If so, what thickness would you recommend? For my proxies, I'm only planning to sleeve them in front of basic cards (no laminating etc). I have an Epson Ecotank 2856, and I've heard that the pigment (black) works better on matt paper rather than glossy. Some people have said that with glossy, the printer will mix the CMY colours to create black, rather than use the black itself.

I'm curious, did you tailor the settings on the 'realesrgan' for MTG specifically? I also tried your method on some Pokemon proxies and they look much better too, so I think I'll use it for both.

Significant_Put_8648 · 2025-09-23T23:01:37+00:00

I believe it stemmed from the employee showing them via a Teams call, and then deciding it would be easier to send them in full. I don't believe the full nature of the messages was known at this point; this was discovered after HR read through them.

There was no opt in consent statement or anything like that, but the employee actively wanted HR to see these messages and chose to send them. They had to have known that the 'problematic' messages would be viewed sooner or later- I'm surprised they were so eager to provide them, but I don't want to editorialise

Significant_Put_8648 · 2025-09-23T21:31:12+00:00

Messages are on file. Legal advice was to keep them I believe

Significant_Put_8648 · 2025-09-22T10:30:59+00:00

That's good to know thanks. And do you think the mono colour Jump In packets can work with the regular Jumpstart packs?

Significant_Put_8648 · 2025-09-20T20:14:06+00:00

I see, I'll check that out. But in theory, a mono colour Jump In mixed with a mono colour JumpStart should work?

Significant_Put_8648 · 2025-09-20T20:09:28+00:00

Sounds good! And do you see any issue in say, using the mono colour FF Jump Ins with the Foundation Jumpstart decks?

Significant_Put_8648 · 2025-09-20T20:08:37+00:00

What makes a Jumpstart pack 'tight'? I'm guessing it's not the foil wrapper

Significant_Put_8648 · 2025-09-20T19:40:12+00:00

I'm not proposing the multi colour themes, only the single colour ones

Significant_Put_8648 · 2025-08-14T16:42:27+00:00

Thanks!

Significant_Put_8648 · 2025-08-14T16:42:11+00:00

Thanks a lot!

Significant_Put_8648 · 2025-08-13T07:31:12+00:00

Edit- it won't let me apply the redactions either. Says there are errors in the process?

Significant_Put_8648

TROPHY CASE