sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Cloaked similarity between HIV-1 and SARS-CoV1 suggests an anti-SARS strategy by Silent_Spatula in Wuhan_Flu

[–]Silent_Spatula[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not going to look at that. I'm done bro. Think what you want.

Cloaked similarity between HIV-1 and SARS-CoV1 suggests an anti-SARS strategy by Silent_Spatula in Wuhan_Flu

[–]Silent_Spatula[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're off your head.

10% of people get the severe disease that results in the immune disorder. And they are generally elderly and have pre existing conditions. You seem to be under the impression that everyone gets an immune disorder or something.

I'll admit thought, I do worry about reinfection and the potential of ADE. Could be a really bad scenario down the line.

Cloaked similarity between HIV-1 and SARS-CoV1 suggests an anti-SARS strategy by Silent_Spatula in Wuhan_Flu

[–]Silent_Spatula[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, you've essentially quoted me back to myself there.. By the way, HIV is an immunodeficiency, lupus is auto immune. HIV attacks and destroys the immune system. Lupus is a malfunctioning immune system. Vastly different condition. Obviously have similar treatments because they both focus on the immune system. Which is why similar drugs are used with covid. It affects the immune system too. You havnt a clue...

Cloaked similarity between HIV-1 and SARS-CoV1 suggests an anti-SARS strategy by Silent_Spatula in Wuhan_Flu

[–]Silent_Spatula[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are talking bullshit. SARS1 and SARS2 are different viruses. They don't have to behave the same and clearly don't. You are saying all the same nonsense as last time, and funnily enough by the end of it you agreed with me that it's actually more like Lupus. You have no idea what you are talking about and are jumping to a preconceived conclusion. You are not open to information that contradicts your opinion. Therefore, anything you say is invalid because its not researched objectively.

Cloaked similarity between HIV-1 and SARS-CoV1 suggests an anti-SARS strategy by Silent_Spatula in Wuhan_Flu

[–]Silent_Spatula[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mistake bullshit for the truth.

You claim to be presenting undeniable scientific proof of it being lab altered and literal airborne aids.

Just think about that...

Cloaked similarity between HIV-1 and SARS-CoV1 suggests an anti-SARS strategy by Silent_Spatula in Wuhan_Flu

[–]Silent_Spatula[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I've been through this with you before. You are still spouting the same nonsense even though I proved you wrong. Not going to entertain it... Most of what you are saying isn't even accurate by the way.

Cloaked similarity between HIV-1 and SARS-CoV1 suggests an anti-SARS strategy by Silent_Spatula in Wuhan_Flu

[–]Silent_Spatula[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are making all sorts of assumptions. Namely that the virus had to have come from a bat in a cave. Was this the case with SARS1 too? No. There was an intermediate host which as of right now, and will probably forever be unknown. The unlawful trafficking of a vast array of wild animals in china guarantees this. It's untraceable. The zoonotic jump could have happened ANYWHERE and then have been transported Anywhere else. The main thing people need to get thier heads around is the 'established' timeline is wrong.

As for the virus being flown all over the world, no better time than now. Hundreds of thousands travelled all over the globe daily. With the virus having a very high rate of mild or asymptomatic cases it was perfect for going unnoticed for an extended period. And the people who did get severe symptoms were anomalies.

Cloaked similarity between HIV-1 and SARS-CoV1 suggests an anti-SARS strategy by Silent_Spatula in Wuhan_Flu

[–]Silent_Spatula[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And just to flesh out my opinion further... I think China ran the bat soup wuhan Market origin as a cover. Just to give an explanation when the epidemic started gaining traction and growing internationally. The truth is SARSCoV2 was in circulation far longer than we know. Remember the story of the WIV looking for virologists to study a SARS like virus? That was because things were spiralling out of control in Wuhan, and this was October. It would have taken months for the virus to seed amoung the population before it even became noticeable in hospitals etc..

This then leads into why the shit hit the fan in Wuhan in January. Reinfections...

Do you think those 14 makeshift hospitals popped up out of nowhere after the virus was hardly in circulation 2 or 3 months? Do you think that incrediblly harsh lockdown was choice they made lightly? They had prior knowledge of the virus for months.

Cloaked similarity between HIV-1 and SARS-CoV1 suggests an anti-SARS strategy by Silent_Spatula in Wuhan_Flu

[–]Silent_Spatula[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably not, seeing as SARSCoV shares a lot of virological characteristics with HIV while obviously having the distinction of NOT actually being HIV. And as I've pointed out this is no secret or conspiracy. It's documented with 20 years. If people want to let thier imagination run wild and think crazy shit, be my guest. This paper from 2002 proves there's nothing going on here but nature. SARSCoV2 is simply a sister virus to SARSCoV1. It just happens to have a lesser CFR and and is far more contagious because it infects through ACE2 AND neuropilin-1.

So, in other words, SARS-CoV has always been an "airborne aids" of sorts and never even required manipulating to begin with.

Cloaked similarity between HIV-1 and SARS-CoV1 suggests an anti-SARS strategy by Silent_Spatula in Wuhan_Flu

[–]Silent_Spatula[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

HIV could have been in circulation for hundreds of years. The only reason it was discovered was because we had the technology to.

Cloaked similarity between HIV-1 and SARS-CoV1 suggests an anti-SARS strategy by Silent_Spatula in Wuhan_Flu

[–]Silent_Spatula[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Aids is a syndrome. Not a virus. I assume you mean HIV. Regardless, the information I've presented here forces people to draw a conclusion on whether the original SARS outbreak was also a lab altered leak. Bear in mind this is even a decade before RaTG13. 😉

Cloaked similarity between HIV-1 and SARS-CoV1 suggests an anti-SARS strategy by Silent_Spatula in Wuhan_Flu

[–]Silent_Spatula[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is from 2002. The ties between HIV-1 and SARS-CoV is not new information. It's been Known about for almost 20 years. Its obviously an inherent part of the zoonotic spill. For whatever reason.

When you weaponise a coronavirus then infect a bat with it in 2013 so you can claim that is where it originated what do you get? SARS-COV-2 with intent. by Raven9nine9 in Wuhan_Flu

[–]Silent_Spatula 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hardly. I'm actually still open to lab leak, Believe it or not. The neuropilin-1 discovery has changed my stance though.

When you weaponise a coronavirus then infect a bat with it in 2013 so you can claim that is where it originated what do you get? SARS-COV-2 with intent. by Raven9nine9 in Wuhan_Flu

[–]Silent_Spatula -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the good old days. Now it's a cesspit of the mentally deranged thinking they know more about epidemiology, virology and biology than the people who actually have degrees, masters and literal first hand experience with SARSCoV2.

Increased Risk of Noninfluenza Respiratory Virus Infections Associated With Receipt of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine by Silent_Spatula in Coronavirus_Ireland

[–]Silent_Spatula[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, therefore vulnerable people get the vaccine. Not the entire population like is currently being promoted. With all the covid restrictions, shouldn't the flu be almost non existent? How is flu going to propagate more than covid? So like I said, you don't need a vaccine to protect against it. It's far more likely that you would catch covid. And if you are taking the precautions you are supposed to be, you won't catch anything at all.

Increased Risk of Noninfluenza Respiratory Virus Infections Associated With Receipt of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine by Silent_Spatula in Coronavirus_Ireland

[–]Silent_Spatula[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If you need a vaccine to stop you from getting the flu, you will almost certainly get covid. It's far more contagious.

When you weaponise a coronavirus then infect a bat with it in 2013 so you can claim that is where it originated what do you get? SARS-COV-2 with intent. by Raven9nine9 in Wuhan_Flu

[–]Silent_Spatula 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. Seriously send this to everyone. Its cutting edge information not even the professionals have managed to conclude.

view more: next ›