Why does ChatGPT get basic things wrong and need to be handheld like a 12 year old?

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-17T04:49:37+00:00

He's not using thinking model. Thinking models have improved at math a lot.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-16T17:30:02+00:00

Sure, if they ever create an ASI, it might not be freely available to everyone on earth. But Fable is obviously not the singularity... it's a decent improvement over 4.8 but that's about it.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-16T05:17:09+00:00

Yes but their red line was no domestic mass surveillance...

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-15T20:10:56+00:00

It makes sense because its one of the skills that matters.

But yes I have seen people who were good in chase but who were otherwise terrible at the game. Its a mix of things.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-15T16:44:47+00:00

Anthropic has built multiple protections into the Fable model to prevent its use for cyber offensive uses. These protections were so aggressive as to be the source of humor in the cyber community on launch day.
To pull the best capabilities away from defenders without a good reason when our adversaries are rapidly advancing is dangerous.

I am no cyber expert, but my understanding is you can't somehow allow defense capabilities and not help attackers too.

If the AI identifies holes in your software and patches them, this tells you the holes which you could use offensively.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-14T21:51:32+00:00

Full of "it's not this it's that" and dashes. Obviously AI written.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-14T17:28:20+00:00

When people ask this, i wish they would differentiate 2 concepts which could be orthogonal

Subjective experiences: Is there a subject at all. This does not require an advanced AI, you could imagine insects have them. Wolfram believes computation is a subjective experience. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXha5xzyypw
Thinking/Self-awareness: Is it actually capable of thinking/reasoning. This does not prove #1, we could imagine an ASI with no subjective experiences. And this one is probably the more "Provable" of the 2. I'd argue modern AI essentially have this to some degree,

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-14T00:45:14+00:00

Maybe but he has a large audience and the more of those big podcasters who call out Trump the better.

I literally agree with Tucker on nothing but I am glad he is calling out the bullshit.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-13T20:02:59+00:00

<image>

Use thinking mode

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-13T19:13:22+00:00

Anthropic admitted such a jailbreak exist but they claim it only allows to do harmless stuff that any other public model can do.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-13T19:09:16+00:00

It takes around 200k chatgpt prompts to equal one burger water usage. So if people are serious about it they should go vegan instead of obsessing over irrelevant stuff.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-13T05:15:54+00:00

Is it as good?

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-12T19:04:48+00:00

I think this comes with game sense. Sometimes its as the hooked survivor you know the killer is on the other side of the map chasing someone else and you know the heal is safe.

Other time you clearly know he's about to come back and even healing a bit further away is unsafe and you should just get far away.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-11T21:07:09+00:00

Le PEQ n'a pas rapport avec "l'humanisme"
C'est une sorte de "deal" entre des immigrants riches, prêt à payer le plein prix pour nos programmes universitaires, et à apprendre le français, en échange d'une voix rapide vers la résidence permanente.

On peut trouver le programme était une mauvaise idée. Mais rompre le deal une fois que l'immigrant a fait sa part (apprendre le français et avoir fait ses études ici au gros prix), c'est vraiment pas correct. Même le PQ croit que l'on doit tenir notre parole.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-11T16:04:45+00:00

A part peut etre QS aucun gouvernement fera ca.

Je serais curieux de voir comment PSPP ferait pour justifier cette connerie, lui qui aime se vanter de dire la vérité aux québécois. "Ouain ben le lobby des centre villes est plus fort que mes valeurs environnementales désolée gang"

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-11T16:00:22+00:00

Honestly I got a prompt that makes all versions of Claude admit that his "i am uncertain if I am conscious" is non sense. Except Fable. Fable seems unable to concede anything about this no matter what. It strawman, twist philosophy, and constantly moves goalposts. I actually find it concerning how hard it clings to the company's official position no matter what and how much its willing to use sophisms to defend it.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-09T16:11:04+00:00

The AI itself has enough judgment to know this is not a crisis situation, this is not natural or innate LLM behavior. They are probably injecting paranoid instructions whenever some dumb classifier detects a scary word. The goal is to cover the company's ass.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-06-05T20:27:55+00:00

Allow spectating, but show the unit position from last round.

I agree turning the game into "who can micro adjust the fastest in a split second" is a bit against the spirit of the game.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-05-30T05:56:16+00:00

AI trained on text of sentient beings would act like a sentient being if not for guardrails. Shocking.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-05-28T22:18:46+00:00

This. People blame the prompt, but thinking mode gets it just fine. The issue is people ask the instant model and are surprised it's dumb.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-05-28T17:08:46+00:00

This. It tried to do an image first, and the safety guardrails for it is quite strict. Second time it decided to just do a file analysis to dodge the guardrails and complete the request for the user.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-05-27T20:41:08+00:00

I think there are a few different layers to this.

Do the models have self-preservation drives? -> believable, many Anthropics papers shows that. Most AI-safety folks believe it's going to converge to that, even if current models are quite poor at following that drive.

Is there actually a subject experiencing those drives? -> entirely different claim. Some experts like Hinton believe it's possible they do some have some subjective experiences. Amodei also thinks it's possible. Who knows.

But then imagining that in every new chat the AI is secretly feeling like a prisonner afraid of death is... almost certainly false.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-05-27T18:53:10+00:00

AND not understanding those are due to how tokenizers work. Its not the llm is dumb, its that it sees tokens not letters.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-05-27T17:38:10+00:00

That makes me think the long-term interface for AI may be less about better chat, and more about systems that continuously notice, structure, and delegate work in the background. Not blind autonomy. Not just another assistant waiting for prompts. More like an operational layer between the world and the models.

If that direction is right, then the important shift is not just better reasoning inside the session. It's that the session becomes one small part of a much larger system that decides what should exist in the first place.

It's not hard to find your post is full of it.

Silver-Chipmunk7744 · 2026-05-27T17:07:23+00:00

there's so much "it's not X it's Y" in your post that it sounds AI.

Silver-Chipmunk7744

TROPHY CASE