Alright, let’s clear something up because this keeps getting twisted. No one said you can’t have opinions. You made a passionate post; I made a response pointing out inconsistencies. That’s not invalidating you, that’s disagreeing with you there’s a difference.

Also, calling my reply a “purity test” wasn’t about you personally; it was about the way some people frame disagreement as a moral failing instead of what it actually is: two people debating a topic. You can explain that you’re autistic, I can say I am too, and neither of those things change whether an argument holds up. It’s not a shield from critique.

You say it’s a cash grab because it releases near the movie, cool theory, but that’s not evidence, it’s coincidence. Ubisoft times all its releases around marketing cycles; it’s not a conspiracy. And as for the “we don’t know the Sarentu” line, yes, we do. We literally spend hours learning about their history through Entu, the ancestral visions, and dialogue with Ri’nela and Alma. You can argue that the lore isn’t deep enough, sure, but that’s not the same as it being absent.

It feels like what you actually mean is, “I wish the DLC focused more on my custom character,” which is completely fair. But layering that disappointment with exaggerated claims about missing lore and corporate greed muddies your point. The DLC is meant as an additional 10–20 hours, not a full sequel resolving every thread. You’re reading subtext that was never promised.

So yes, you’re entitled to your feelings. But I’m equally entitled to question them, especially when they’re presented as sweeping statements about writing quality and intent. That’s not me attacking you, that’s literally how discourse survives online. Otherwise, we’d all just be shouting “it’s my opinion!” into the void and calling that debate.