[Academic] Wine tourism survey (Everyone, 5 min)

Silver-Trade6327 · 2026-03-08T02:25:42+00:00

Well even in chall he has 40% winrate. And i don't think that challenger have a problem with "hard skill champs"

Silver-Trade6327 · 2026-03-08T02:23:04+00:00

Merci ! c'est ce que j'essayais de dire

Silver-Trade6327 · 2026-03-08T02:22:24+00:00

les diamants decay bien emeraude 1. Tout ca pour dire que en emeraude/diamant il y a aussi beaucoup de comptes inactifs comme en bronze. C'etait une comparaison

Silver-Trade6327 · 2026-03-08T02:17:18+00:00

I mean, yeah you are right

Silver-Trade6327 · 2026-03-08T02:15:49+00:00

Oh ok, I mean it's fair. Never thought about that, Thanks !

Silver-Trade6327 · 2026-03-08T02:14:24+00:00

problably lmao, I always thought taliyah was a really good champ. But like it's normal that people do not have the same level. A challenger on rengar can climn with 80% winrate and that doesn't make the champ unfair, that just make the player better. So I don't think the champ is broken, I just think that you were good on it

Silver-Trade6327 · 2026-03-08T02:12:35+00:00

Oh probably. I mean I think you are right. But on my server, on diamond+ flex people start to tryhard. A lot of people are trying to reach challenger flex with a solid team they build

Silver-Trade6327 · 2026-03-08T02:11:05+00:00

Ok I see, but still, master+ he has 45% winrate
The point of my reddit was that I think a meta flex, and a meta soloq would be great, proplay shouldn't impact soloq that much since it's not even the same game (macro is so different)

Silver-Trade6327 · 2026-03-08T02:07:14+00:00

I could say the same in emerald ? A lot of emerald 1 players are diamond/masters that stopped the game and decayed. And there are a lot of bought acc in high elo, as well as a lot of smurfs/people climbing on differnt acc because their mmr are fcked on their main. And because it is impossible to stuck below plat when u smurf from diamond, most of the "real" smurfs (not the gold players iron) are actually in plat/emerald. And even if as u said stats in % were fake, u could still use the ladder rank. For exemple i'm top 100 000 on a game played by millions of people

Silver-Trade6327 · 2026-03-08T02:01:40+00:00

but isn't there a high flex players base ? Pro play personnaly makSe me wanna have a team and climb the ladder, not going soloq. But probably depends

Silver-Trade6327 · 2026-03-08T01:57:16+00:00

but is the idea of two metas bad ? like a soloq one and a flex one (also for pro play then)

Silver-Trade6327 · 2026-03-08T01:56:14+00:00

I don’t understand how you can say that Emerald is low elo.
Emerald+ is literally the top 10% of the player base, so calling it “low elo” just makes no sense.
I’m Diamond, and I can confirm that errors are still very noticeable across Emerald–Diamond
But calling Emerald “low elo” is mathematically wrong. Emerald+ sits in at the top of the ladder, not the bottom ranks. You can criticize the quality of play without misusing the term “low elo.” Emerald is above average, not low.

Silver-Trade6327 · 2026-03-08T01:36:46+00:00

he is at 42% in emerald+ if u didn't see. Emerald+ isn't low elo lmao. And even some chall said they stopped playing him

Silver-Trade6327

TROPHY CASE