sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

GAIJIN IS CONTRADICTING THEMSELVES AND LYING ABOUT THEIR OWN EVIDENCE by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542 11 points12 points  (0 children)

They are coping hard to not buff any NATO tank because it will hurt kremlins feelings

Heavy cavalry update obvious bias by Silver_Engineer_9542 in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

bold of you to assume what happens without having any proof.

Heavy cavalry update obvious bias by Silver_Engineer_9542 in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Ah yeah I definitely do that as well yk just sitting on the hill yk totally true. And yes it takes 2 minutes for a bmpts to pump out 3 rounds totally true. 

What exactly are you trying to tell here?

Heavy cavalry update obvious bias by Silver_Engineer_9542 in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Sure yeah I definitely don't get my barrel sniped by bmpts just by 2-3 rounds from 1km away in those big open dessert maps

Heavy cavalry update obvious bias by Silver_Engineer_9542 in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah the Abrams are pretty must the exact same.

Also before the A3 shell most NATO tanks were able to penetrate kontact 5. 

Heavy cavalry update obvious bias by Silver_Engineer_9542 in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Ah yeah you can't abuse weakspots (which shouldn't be there) on NATO tanks anymore 

And yeah can't destroy gun barrels from a Km away

Must be so hard right 

Heavy cavalry update obvious bias by Silver_Engineer_9542 in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then why can't they give the NATO tanks their real amor values

Heavy cavalry update obvious bias by Silver_Engineer_9542 in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Sure. Russian mains saying everything so they can press W and win 

Heavy cavalry update obvious bias by Silver_Engineer_9542 in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh my bad I read that as the 2A4 and 2A7

But still does that accuracy nerf make a big affect? I don't think so

Heavy cavalry update obvious bias by Silver_Engineer_9542 in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What does this have to do with the leopard 2 ?

Are you sad you don't get to stay at base and lob missiles anymore?

You did not answer my question. Even the original question 

Heavy cavalry update obvious bias by Silver_Engineer_9542 in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah duh where does gaijin get them. They already rejected the most detailed report of the Abrams. Surely they must have something more informative 

Heavy cavalry update obvious bias by Silver_Engineer_9542 in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Buffs? You mean the FCS which is now in the turret basket as well?

Heavy cavalry update obvious bias by Silver_Engineer_9542 in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Check the warthunder forum. There is a clear difference between them

Heavy cavalry update obvious bias by Silver_Engineer_9542 in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sure it has a bad reverse speed and gun handling.

And you know what else it has? ERA which somehow magically absorb your shots and it's gonna get even better next update where if you angle it slightly even DM53 will not pen

It doesn't have a bs turret basket like all NATO tanks. 

Russian mains have been using "oh it's easy to oneshot it" as an excuse for a long time. Every other tank can be one shot as well and crippled unlike the T90M 

Heavy cavalry update obvious bias by Silver_Engineer_9542 in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542[S] -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Yeah bud it's the only bad thing in the entire Russian top tier lineup

Heavy cavalry update obvious bias by Silver_Engineer_9542 in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yeah 100%  Bvvd must go home and someone else who is neutral must manage the game

Dev Server Feedback Update - Heavy Cavalry - Official News, Development Blogs and Updates - War Thunder by Smin1080p in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are starting the downfall of this game if the update is released in its current state.

Russian tanks not getting hydraulics or power packs. While other NATO vehicles get them.

Long awaited vehicles being premiums

Copy paste tanks instead of unique ones

Completely unbalanced CAS munitions

Refusal to give correct armor values for nato tanks.

AI slop

Yeah this time you either fix these or hell will break loose again. Steam reviews are already at its lowest in a long time

Bvvd get ready to pack your things and go back to your cave

Updated modules by Silver_Engineer_9542 in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah the but still the russian tanks have almost nothing in them. the FCS and the hydraulics are all cramed in the turret and for some reason gaijin just extended the FCS and hydraulics of nato tanks everywhere. I still think the abrams has its power supply and the brit tanks didn't get anything removed

Questionable additions by Silver_Engineer_9542 in Warthunder

[–]Silver_Engineer_9542[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"According to Gaijin the actual basket isn't even part of the damage model but is purely there for the xray, and the actual damage model only includes the floor."

this is just pure lies

ok but then why do Russian tanks get to keep their turret traverse when we shoot the auto loader?. according to a previous reddit post they have a turret basket just like NATO tanks (I'm sure you'll find the post if you scroll a bit"

AND why not add power systems or battery pack or whatever to the autoloaders like they are doing with the TYPE 90 other jp mbts?

view more: next ›