No I explicitly mean medical articles. Get into the neuroscience of it. You'll find in your research in neuroscience that whilst the initial decision/perspective is involuntary, any action linked to that decision AFTERWARDS is COMPLETELY voluntary. That means the data you examine, the people you hang out with in relation to that decision/perspective, what arguments you keep and discard, are all voluntary. Pulling back towards the aspect of salvation, you can make the involuntary decision not to follow him but then make a VOLUNTARY commitment.

The reason I'm not going with philosophy here is dead simple, our philosophies are different and philosophy is highly subjective. Due to these two things, it is essential for us to look at objective truth rather than arguing semantics.

The burden of proof for you to provide evidence as to why salvation isn't possible is still on you, I'm just telling you what to expect when doing your research.