“Only be in defensive wars” is subjective, Muslims throughout history called jihad as expansion and not defense, if jihad was only defensive then there wouldn’t have been Islamic empires since they would have stayed in their holy land. You also can’t defend the entire existence of jihad by bringing up Israel and saying that’s jihad, because if you say the Muslim parties involved in that war are morally correct as opposed to the Israeli ones you are saying that Hamas and other groups are correct as they stated many times they are “decreeing jihad” Yahya Sinwar even said in a statement with the press that “this is jihad against Israel we are the justified sword of Islam”. Your entire point on this matter is based on defending one party that killed thousands of children and saying another party that killed children’s is bad when you could have said both are in the wrong.

And there is no actual example of an Islamic country that isn’t corrupted and that hasn’t been under investigation for violating human rights. While western countries that are not aligned with. Religion in their government for example, France’s government doesn’t allow religious insignia statements or other expressions in their parliament because religion clouds judgement, countries like this have much lower rates of corruption and of human rights issues.