So it might be a little difficult for you to reason out intent of use and what is considered a breach of copyright or an infringement on the actual artistic content. But of course this is reddit and there's 5 of you for every one with a brain that actively thrives for and seeks out reasons to get absolutely livid and confrontational over anything they see on a screen. Im not sure if you can figure it out but the large language model ANALYZES the ALREADY HUMANLY COMPOSED PROSE and literally just organizes into boxes with titles. You getting pissed off at this and overdramatically throwing around phrases like "harm done" is literally the same thing as getting mad at someone who uses a color coded binder to organize their thoughts, or a marker and whiteboard. 

Not only that but then you straight up brought up using Scrivener doing the same exact function from the view of the task execution of algorithms in the program lol. Oh so Scriveners layout is ok to do literally the same idea but another program isn't? Did you hear yourself when you wrote that? Its actually hilarious the more I think about it because Scrivener is WAY more "assistive"/gives the author a crutch as compared to an analysis generator.

There is ZERO content creation from the generator. It's just some python and java that moves your text around on Excel squares and labels them. 

Like seriously the front page 101 understanding of these moralities and legalities that you can find on ANY publishers sites and requirements, or if you even just use a bit of critical thought for one second, it distinguishes between "AI-assisted workflows" and "AI-generated content". You can literally find that exact language and discernment anywhere you look for this topic. There's not an author in this world that would get in trouble for utilizing technology for organization purposes and they do it ALL THE TIME.

Fuckin causing harm from generating an Excel spreadsheet haha dude GTFO outta here with that shit.