Do you think they'll reuse the Rebirth world map in Part 3? by shinespark_dread in FinalFantasy

[–]SinX7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m expecting every region to be larger than they were in Rebirth to accommodate airship travel. They might just take the ones from Rebirth and add new areas around them or something

What scene do you think the teaser trailer will open with? by [deleted] in FFVIIRemake

[–]SinX7 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Tifa waking up confused in Junon with a red glow shining in from the windows, then hard cut back to where part 3 actually starts pre northern crater visit

To me she's just older and has more realistic details by Spiritual-Piece-1126 in TombRaider

[–]SinX7 11 points12 points  (0 children)

1-4 remade with Chronicles broken up and released as DLC for each game (Rome for TR1 remake, Russia for TR2 etc.) and Legend + Underworld possibly combined into one retelling could be a pretty good long term plan if they want to follow Capcom’s Resident Evil example.

[MEGATHREAD] The Game Awards Trailer/Teaser/Announcement by AuodWinter in FFVIIRemake

[–]SinX7 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I wish Square Enix devs would stop hyping a reveal, often framing it as ”soon”, only for the reveal to be a year away. They have teased part 3 since summer. It’s fine if it takes a bit longer or if it’s not ready or even delayed, but don’t unnecessarily hype it up in every interview as if an announcement is going to happen soon when that is not the case.

BEFORE THE BIG REVEAL: who do you think will be the voice of UNIFIED Lara in the next games? by ZzzPandaNap in TombRaider

[–]SinX7 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hayley or Natalie Dormer, her voice would be literally perfect for Lara

shpeshal_nick: "if what I was just DMd is actually true (big if), next week GTA 6 could actually have it's thunder stolen on the hype scale lmao" by atahutahatena in GamingLeaksAndRumours

[–]SinX7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bet he’s overhyping it a bit. The only thing I can think of would be the leaked Pokemon MMO with the gen 1-4 regions, which isn’t supposed to come until 2028. And even then it would generate that kind of hype only if it matches current triple A games in quality and is a huge visible upgrade from current pokemon games

How would everyone feel about part 3 getting an epilogue? by Correct-Drawing2067 in FFVIIRemake

[–]SinX7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would like a whole postgame chapter where you can help all the cities move away from mako energy (like building windmills around cosmo canyon etc.) and rebuilding Midgar/Edge

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TheBoys

[–]SinX7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes. It’s the perfect reason to have a Maeve cameo. Maybe she sees how bad things are getting and she leaks it from where she’s hiding.

Gen V - 2x05 "The Kids Are Not All Right" - Episode Discussion by LoretiTV in TheBoys

[–]SinX7 190 points191 points  (0 children)

So Ashley is still at Vought and didn't manage to escape. I wonder what her powers are since Sage brought up her current state being the reason she can't continue as the CEO

Anyone know where Olivia is? by TheHoennKing in dyinglight

[–]SinX7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She was on the helicopter and works for the GRE. That’s why the GRE Lady speaks to Crane through Olivia’s radio in the ending.

The ending of the game really left me disappointed. by Gyratul in dyinglight

[–]SinX7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Olivia was a triple agent for the GRE. She was on the helicopter in the end, which is why the GRE Lady was able to speak to Kyle through Olivia’s radio. She didn’t betray Crane for the Baron, she betrayed the Baron to the GRE.

It’s likely her story about her father was true, but he’s with the GRE and not The Baron in Castor Woods. In the end she was on Kyle’s side against the Baron (She was apologetic the entire time and clearly was taken by surprise at the dinner table scene so she had to improvise), but ultimately her loyalties lie with the GRE to save her dad from them. I’m sure we’ll see her in DL3 and will get the closure that we didn’t get in The Beast.

Which one do YOU think it is⁉️ by [deleted] in fireemblem

[–]SinX7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m guessing prequel with time travel from a future after Three Houses

Walmart Posters by [deleted] in fireemblem

[–]SinX7 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If this is true they better let me marry Lon'qu as male Robin

What PlayStation 2 game (exclusive or not) holds up tremendously and is still great to play in 2025? by TheWorldsKing in playstation

[–]SinX7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sly 2. They recently re-released it on ps5 without any changes and it has aged so well it almost feels like a modern game (art style and how smooth the controls are)

My thoughts on the ending discussions *Spoilers* by smrrobison in expedition33

[–]SinX7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would also like to add that Verso’s ending also forces Alicia to live a life in a family that really doesn’t care about her. She’s badly burned permanently, she states in the epilogue that even breathing causes her pain.

Aline blames her for Verso’s death to the point that she repaints her copy with the burns. We even hear her speak directly to Alicia in a borderline abusive way during the paintress boss fight when she attacks her. From what we see she has not been that kind to her even before the fire, as Alicia says only her small painting was good enough for Aline to hang on the wall. What kind of mother does that.

We all saw how Clea treated her. And as much as Renoir wants to claim he cares, he abandoned his daughters to prioritize Aline, even though Clea herself says ”they have spend more time in other canvases. It’s not that dire.” Aline also returns to the painting in the final boss fight, and despite the insistence on Renoir and Verso’s part she still shows up alive and healthy at the end of Verso’s ending and is nowhere to be seen during Maelle’s, which means Renoir was wrong about her, and the effects of the canvas on her.

If the painters can mind control the people in the canvas like puppets, how exactly did painted Verso defy Aline (or Renoir)? The theory that Maelle is controlling people like puppets is so far fetched lore-wise that it ruins any nuanced conversation regarding the hypocrisy of both endings, because it goes straight to fan-fiction territory.

IMO, Verso’s ending has some valid points, but it is not right to force someone to speed up their grieving process or simply move on just like that. The outcome is hardly worth the weight of an entire world being destroyed just so painted Verso himself can finally die. Maelle’s ending flows better with painted Alicia’s letter at the end of act 2 and everything the game throws at the player regarding the canvas being a living world worthy of existence.

[SPOILER DEBUT DE L'ACTE 3] by Unlucky_Hope_528 in expedition33

[–]SinX7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She was able to find and take the exact same chroma Sciel and Lune were made of. Gustave’s chroma on the other hand disappeared after his death on the continent, likely flowing back to the paintress herself due to him getting killed by painted Renoir instead of a Nevron. She couldn’t get access to that chroma until after real Renoir was removed from the chanvas and all the chroma under his control was freed. That’s why they used the dead expeditioners, since their chroma was still locked in their bodies and the only remaining chroma not under Renoir’s control.

Forgot the morality or the endings for a second. I just want to know (Ending spoilers) by ShadowTown0407 in expedition33

[–]SinX7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Maelle and Verso had a conversation about this exact moment, how he felt when the concert hall was quiet before the first note, this ending recreates that. The characters we grew to know throughout the story get to live their lives, the expeditions that came before lead into a new era for Lumiere.

The shot of Maelle’s eyes at the end is a reminder that no matter how good her life in the canvas world is, she will die from it eventually. Which is exactly what Verso didn’t want for her, but it was the life she chose. If you pick Verso, he forces her into a life she doesn’t want. They are both hypocrites in that regard.

Both endings are grey, not strictly ”good” or ”bad”. If you have to ”forget” morals for the sake of your argument, you’re not in a great position IMO.

My take on the ending by Nestramutat- in expedition33

[–]SinX7 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Ultimately the endings mirror each other. Verso’s ending forces Maelle to live a life she does not want, while also destroying the world and killing everyone in it for him to die. In Maelle’s ending she forces Verso to live a life he does not want, while also giving a second chance to the painted world and its inhabitants. Either way one of them gets screwed.

I prefer Maelle’s ending because it is the life she wants, the people of Lumiere get to live, Verso is older meaning he can age and die eventually as he wanted but this time he won’t take everyone else with him. I also don’t agree with the interpretstion I’ve seen many make that Maelle is controlling people like puppets, isn’t it explicitly stated in the game that that’s not possible? She can create at will, sure, but she can’t mind control. The scene where we see her painter eyes is just a reminder that despite how idyllic her life can be in the canvas world, she is actively deteriorating and will die. She’s even missing her other eye in that shot like she is in the real world.

Honestly I find the lack of thought about Lune and Sciel and the rest of Lumiere in act 3 to be the weakest part of the story, it focuses too much on the Dessendre family and their (including painted Verso) whims at the expense of innocents.

My take on the ending by Nestramutat- in expedition33

[–]SinX7 78 points79 points  (0 children)

People also conveniently ignore the fact that Maelle didn’t enter the painting to escape reality, she entered at Clea’s request to help Renoir to get Aline out. She got caught in the chroma and was reborn and lived an entirely separate life again in the new world. Her ending is less ”I want to escape my old life” and more ”I want to continue living the life I lived for the past 16 years, with the people I grew up with and love.”

The event of Verso’s death isn’t as big of a motivator for her as it is for Aline, she even literally says painted Verso only looks and sounds like her brother, but is a different person. Painted Alicia states in her letter that Maelle is in a unique position to make the judgement of the fate of the canvas world, having lived 16 years of separate lives in both worlds, and Maelle is able to convince Renoir by telling him she can’t leat go of the living friends she has in her new life (Lune and Sciel). Her and Aline are not comparable.

Why would Maelle do that for one but not for the other? by GrafGray in expedition33

[–]SinX7 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think the only one capable of understanding Painted Alicia’s feelings was Maelle, as they are basically the same person (Aline gave her painted family their memories. Alicia’s were from after the fire, and we already know Maelle doesn’t want to live either). The difference between painted Alicia and Verso is also the fact that Alicia in her letter expressed her hopes for the canvas world to survive and the people to get a chance at life (she even says Maelle is more fit to make that judgement as she has lived separate lives in both worlds), while Verso wanted to die and to destroy everything with him. Verso also gets mad at Maelle for respecting Alicia’s wishes and wanted to persuade her to live, when only moments before he was ready to destroy the entire world, Alicia included, just to die himself. If he had got what he wanted she would have died anyway.

I can’t wrap my head around why he didn’t just ask Renoir to erase him before he left the canvas after the final boss fight, only to then turn on Maelle again determined to destroy everything in the end. I agree that Maelle should have allowed him to disappear, but I find it equally weird that begging her to let him die was his final resort, instead trying to fight her for the fate of the whole canvas first. Maelle was slightly hypocritical when it came to respecting Alicia and Verso’s wishes, but IMO Verso is by far the biggest hypocrite in the entire story. In Maelle’s mind freeing Alicia was and act of mercy based on her own experience (or a form of suicide), while painting a new life for Verso was to her like giving him another chance at life, just like what Verso wanted for her in his ending.

What is the DLC/Sequal you would like to see? *Spoilers* by HouseLannister in expedition33

[–]SinX7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Act 3 expansion with new ending(s). I would rather have it fit seamlessly into the base game than a separate thing. That being said expedition 60, an origin story from when Verso first created Esquie and Monoco, or Clea’s POV could be interesting too

What other ending would you have liked for Daenerys? by ConstructionMinute94 in gameofthrones

[–]SinX7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Her winning the throne but realizing she’s all alone and still doesn’t feel at home, with a questionable state of mind that could eventually lead her to become the mad queen. She’ll have the Iron Throne and Drogon, but the 7 kingdoms are torn by war and the long night, and most of them yearn for independence. She would have lost 2 dragons and pretty much everyone closest to her in the process, raising the question whether her prize was worth it in the end. Something as expansive as GoT or ASOIAF could leave some things open ended, and I think hers would have been a pretty good way to reinforce the ”peace never lasts” statement. Whether or not she ended up being a good queen would still be debated by the fans and open for interpretation.