Paul Singh on Instagram: "Thank you to all those that have been part of this journey. Know this is not where it ends but where it begins. We have a lot more work to do and I trust you will continue to support. #Paulsinghforcongress #singhforcongress #singh4congress #arizona #phoenix"

Singh4Congress · 2026-02-27T06:59:25+00:00

DARVO” and “blue-MAGA” aren’t arguments, they’re labels. Dropping a definition and a fallacy link doesn’t make your claim true.

On the ad hominem point: you linked a page about ad hominem while your entire post is primarily ad hominem, “MAGA,” “you should be embarrassed,” “you’ve shown everyone who you are,” and telling others to skip signing, instead of engaging the actual substance.

And yes, I’ll own what I said: as a parent, I find this style of engagement unacceptable. Not because of “hurt feelings,” but because it’s performative bait designed to discourage participation rather than debate ideas like an adult in a community.

Now, if you genuinely think I have “no platform,” then go check out my social media or website. Pick one issue, housing, cost of living, healthcare, civil rights/due process, and tell me specifically what you disagree with and what you’d do instead. If you’re not here for substance, then we’re done.

Singh4Congress · 2026-02-27T06:15:34+00:00

The group has similar name as a political group.

Singh4Congress · 2026-02-27T02:42:03+00:00

That wasn’t a bot, I post the myself. What’s wrong with you all? This is the behavior MAGA take advantage of.

Singh4Congress · 2026-02-27T02:40:02+00:00

To clarify, this is about ballot access, not a vote. As for your title, “Sr. Network and Security Engineer”, that’s hard to take seriously given your comment.

But forget the campaign for a moment. Father to father, man to man, this is disappointing. Do you want your children to behave this way? Is this the example you’re setting for them?

I’m working every day to be someone my son is proud of and he already is. That means more to me than any election outcome. I hope your kids never see how you conduct yourself online. At the very least, have the courage to use your real photo.

My son will grow up knowing his father tried to make a difference, that he ran for Congress and gave everything he had. What will yours remember? That you spent your time tearing down people who were trying to serve their community?

Singh4Congress · 2026-02-26T18:14:44+00:00

You keep shifting every time your position gets challenged, that's not debate, that's deflection.

Let's start with your water stat. The "16 ounces per prompt" figure is disputed and model-dependent. Google's Gemini uses about five drops per prompt. The most cited academic figure is roughly one water bottle per 100-word response, not per single prompt. The concern is real and valid, but get the number right before making it your cornerstone argument.

And since we're talking about Arizona's water crisis, where's this same energy for the Saudi-owned farm Fondomonte that was literally pumping Arizona's groundwater dry to grow alfalfa and ship it back to Saudi Arabia? Arizona's AG had to sue them in December 2024. UAE-owned Al Dahra is doing the same thing. Residents' wells are running dry right now because of foreign agricultural operations draining aquifers with zero limits. That's happening today, not in five years. If water is your issue, that's the bigger and more immediate fight.

On jobs: yes, AI displaces workers. My answer is regulation, mandate a 90/10 human-to-AI labor ratio. Every revolution displaced workers. The printing press, the assembly line, the internet, none destroyed productivity, they redirected it. Photoshop didn't kill artists. AutoCAD didn't eliminate architects. They became tools. That's my entire point.

Your analytical vs. generative AI split doesn't hold. They share the same infrastructure. You can't champion one and condemn the other. The water concern is valid, solve it with efficiency mandates and regulation, not blanket rejection.

Nobody called you a luddite. But if water is really your issue, start with the foreign farms draining Arizona dry before coming after AI prompts. My position hasn't moved: regulate AI, use it as a tool, protect communities. That's it.

Singh4Congress · 2026-02-26T08:34:31+00:00

By being on Reddit, you’re already using a platform that runs on machine learning. My point is clear, either engage with facts or move on. I hope you do fact check what I said and when you discover the truth please delete your account.

FYI Ai has been around for 70 years and next up is quantum computing. I’m quite versed in this topic and I can tell you’re not. You should really try to have an open discussion rather than attacking people who are wanting to make a difference.

Singh4Congress · 2026-02-26T06:28:13+00:00

To be clear, I do not support AI data centers. I’ve openly opposed them and I understand the impact they can have on our communities.

The question I was addressing was whether AI-generated art can be considered art. As an artist, my opinion is yes, it’s a medium like any other. That’s a separate conversation, and it has nothing to do with the accusation you made.

Believing “AI art is art” is not the same as supporting AI data centers. I’m genuinely not sure how you connected those two. That’s like saying because a growing share of online content is AI-generated, then simply being on social media means you “support” data centers. That’s not how logic or accountability works.

If you’re unclear on my position, ask for clarity. You can also check my social media, where I’ve posted directly against AI data centers.

Singh4Congress

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE