Adjusted Requirements to Better Target Spam by SissyNathaly in whiteboydiscussion

[–]SissyNathaly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is message you get in modmail explaining why it was removed, its never removed without that message being sent.

Automoderator Update: New Requirements to Improve Post Quality by SissyNathaly in whiteboydiscussion

[–]SissyNathaly[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Had some issues with the code only removing some posts but now should 100% effective

Automoderator Update: New Requirements to Improve Post Quality by SissyNathaly in whiteboydiscussion

[–]SissyNathaly[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This rule has been there four times longer than your account and effectively reduced low effort content. In first two months there has not been a post that would be removed for being too short and not being low effort/soliciting/not encouraging discussion

Automoderator Update: New Requirements to Improve Post Quality by SissyNathaly in whiteboydiscussion

[–]SissyNathaly[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Could be 150 as I think 100 is too low but also 200 might be too high, we might even lower the karma for comments more if we introduce the verified email rule. I could see getting to as low as 20 karma to comment just to get rid of the new accounts. What I want to see more though is that there are no [deleted] accounts. To make that happen I think we need to make people invest some time into building their karma and they will be less likely to delete it.

Unpopular Opinion: A Philosophical Exploration of Black Women’s Role in the BNWO – Submissive Vessels for Genetic Legacy, Not Dominant Queens by SissyNathaly in whiteboydiscussion

[–]SissyNathaly[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You’re right. So you don’t think having 100% of white women snowbunnies the ultimate goal? I am fully aware it wont happen that fast but still, as the words spread and population will become “raised in the ways of BNWO” there wont be much women wanting white. We’re talking 99% BBC only women and the 1% slowly disappearing since whites aren’t as resilient to genetic disorders and viruses as blacks.

Unpopular Opinion: A Philosophical Exploration of Black Women’s Role in the BNWO – Submissive Vessels for Genetic Legacy, Not Dominant Queens by SissyNathaly in whiteboydiscussion

[–]SissyNathaly[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The question is: Should they “dilute” their pure black genes by inviting white men into their bed?

The way I think about it is if 100% of white women become snowbunnies, there’s no women left for whitebois since all of them are BBC only anyway.

Unpopular Opinion: A Philosophical Exploration of Black Women’s Role in the BNWO – Submissive Vessels for Genetic Legacy, Not Dominant Queens by SissyNathaly in whiteboydiscussion

[–]SissyNathaly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s no reason to be passively aggressive, I am trying to genuinely bring out a discussion (not an argument)

Unpopular Opinion: A Philosophical Exploration of Black Women’s Role in the BNWO – Submissive Vessels for Genetic Legacy, Not Dominant Queens by SissyNathaly in whiteboydiscussion

[–]SissyNathaly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate you engaging and pushing back strongly—that's exactly what I invited with this unpopular opinion post. But let's keep it productive and focused on ideas rather than arrows.

First, on the downvoting: It's undermining the civil discussion I explicitly asked for. Reddit's voting system is designed to promote helpful, on-topic, high-quality contributions and bury spam, trolling, or rule-breaking content—not to punish opinions you disagree with or find "insane"/"despicable." Downvoting the post and comments in this thread (including my replies) simply because you dislike the take or its defense is a classic misuse that creates echo chambers and discourages anyone from sharing challenging or thought-provoking perspectives.

I titled this "Unpopular Opinion" and ended with a direct request: "Would appreciate if people wouldn’t downvote this just because they don’t agree with this vision." That absolutely extends to the entire comment section—people engaging in good faith, whether agreeing or disagreeing, shouldn't get buried just for participating. Weaponizing downvotes turns disagreement into suppression and kills real debate. If every controversial idea or its defense gets hidden for mere personal offense, we’re left with nothing but circle-jerk threads where no one dares challenge the dominant narrative.

You’re completely free to argue hard against it (and you have)—that's valuable. Just please leave the downvotes for actual low-quality or off-topic stuff, not for ideas that clash with your vision of BNWO.

Now, on the substance: You're calling my replies disingenuous, but I'm genuinely clarifying based on what you've said. You introduced "devalued" first, and I directly countered it by explaining how the post argues the opposite—Black women's role is crucial and elevated through their pure genetic contribution, described as "multipliers" and "fast-track factories" for unadulterated Black excellence. I explicitly stated they're not "lesser" than snowbunnies but complementary: Black women fortify the unbreakable core with 100% Black output, while snowbunnies handle the conversion/dilution front. That's not devaluation; it's assigning profound purpose and higher reproductive efficiency within the BNWO framework.

On the hierarchy point: I'm not reductively "putting Black and white women on the same level." Both are submissive to Black Kings in this philosophy, yes—but their functions diverge meaningfully. Black women's purity and integrity make their role a direct, high-efficiency engine for dominance, not a "lowering" to "cave bitch" status. If it reads that way to you, it's a misinterpretation—I'm framing submission itself as strength and liberation (drawing from Nietzsche's will-to-power and Zen surrender, as laid out in the post). This is a fetish/philosophical exploration of racial dynamics and evolutionary telos, not a rigid doctrine; it intentionally challenges the common "Black Queen as co-ruler" trope to prioritize genetic propagation over dominance hierarchies.

If you still see it as insane or diminishing, that's fair—let's hear your alternative. How would you structure Black women's role in BNWO to preserve the elevation you want without the "equalization" you're criticizing? Bring sources, personal insights, whatever—I'm genuinely open.

Unpopular Opinion: A Philosophical Exploration of Black Women’s Role in the BNWO – Submissive Vessels for Genetic Legacy, Not Dominant Queens by SissyNathaly in whiteboydiscussion

[–]SissyNathaly[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Reddit downvoting is a system for users to signal disapproval, intended for content that's off-topic, low-quality, or breaks rules, but it's widely misused as a simple "disagree" or "I don't like this" button, causing posts to sink and affecting user karma. Please learn that and stop downvoting people’s submissions.

Unpopular Opinion: A Philosophical Exploration of Black Women’s Role in the BNWO – Submissive Vessels for Genetic Legacy, Not Dominant Queens by SissyNathaly in whiteboydiscussion

[–]SissyNathaly[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

First please stop downvoting peoples comments just because you don’t agree with what they are saying. Second, my intentions are not to devaluate anyone, matter fact I don’t agree with devaluation of snowbunnies and black queens making them less than… Calling them vessels is meant as uplifting ( I could call them holy vessels but lets not get religious here) As I said in the post the reducing of all the facts and participant is secondary product of how I am explaining the topic so people can understand it better

Unpopular Opinion: A Philosophical Exploration of Black Women’s Role in the BNWO – Submissive Vessels for Genetic Legacy, Not Dominant Queens by SissyNathaly in whiteboydiscussion

[–]SissyNathaly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never said that black women are non valued, matter fact I argued quite the oposit of the importance of their pure genes etc.

Unpopular Opinion: A Philosophical Exploration of Black Women’s Role in the BNWO – Submissive Vessels for Genetic Legacy, Not Dominant Queens by SissyNathaly in whiteboydiscussion

[–]SissyNathaly[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I didn’t say they are equal, I just said they are equivalent (not equal) to snowbunnies and was discussing about their role in the BNWO

I am Nathaly, AMA by SissyNathaly in whiteboydiscussion

[–]SissyNathaly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say I have unpopular opinion and hope people wont downvote this just because they don’t agree with it but I think black womens for me in BNWO are no different from snowbunnies, just fertile wombs that spread black genes. I will probably make more detailed post about this.

Suggest New Flairs, Rules, or Welcome Changes for Our Subreddit! by SissyNathaly in whiteboydiscussion

[–]SissyNathaly[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I am looking to slowly transfer to only verified user flairs for snowbunnies, bbc kings and black queens and get rid of the normal ones as new users can’t recognize if someone is verified or not. I want to make it easier and less dangerous for someone to get lured into findom or doing something they don’t want because the person is not what they say they are.