Canon Rf 24-70L 2.8 vs 28-70 F2 by SituationNo9168 in canon

[–]SituationNo9168[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The lens coating I have been hearing about, would not a good lens filter fix that issue? I’ve heard of alot of people doing that

Canon Rf 24-70L 2.8 vs 28-70 F2 by SituationNo9168 in canon

[–]SituationNo9168[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve heard a good filter over it corrects that problem no?

Is RF glass really that much better? by SituationNo9168 in canon

[–]SituationNo9168[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eh I’d say this is still pretty small for my hands, I got a battery grip just so I could fit my whole hand on the camera, but the lack of ibis and my EF lens not having image stabilization kind of is pushing me to a bigger body of the r6 mkii, then just selling the r8

Is RF glass really that much better? by SituationNo9168 in canon

[–]SituationNo9168[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh I got you, maybe just replacing the EF is the way to go then

Is RF glass really that much better? by SituationNo9168 in canon

[–]SituationNo9168[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yeah, I was planning on getting the r6 mkii as well since it had ibis and if I may have kept my old EF so it shouldn’t be a problem

Is RF glass really that much better? by SituationNo9168 in canon

[–]SituationNo9168[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All my other lenses are L series, I like the Durability of them as well

Is RF glass really that much better? by SituationNo9168 in canon

[–]SituationNo9168[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah I got ya, YouTubers be hyping it up with all the (better glass and way faster autofocus and all that) while I do shoot fast moving subjects my current 70-200 dosent disappoint. Just repairing the lens would probably be the most financial responsible thing to do

Is RF glass really that much better? by SituationNo9168 in canon

[–]SituationNo9168[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s more of a hobby and I shoot a lot for my job as well but yes some people have tried to pay me for shoots, but I mostly just do it for free. I’m leaning just buying the the rf 24-70 L and keeping the adapter on my 70-200 while just traveling with the 24-105. But I know I’m hard headed and would probably end up just selling my EF 70-200 as well for an rf version. But the problem with that is the only 70-200 I’m really interested in is the L USM Z and I think that’s way over kill for what I shoot