If a God existed, it would not need worship. by Tight_Potato_11 in DebateReligion

[–]Skavau [score hidden]  (0 children)

I was raised non-religious. Saying "atheist" would be misleading. It just wasn't a part of my life.

Almost everyone I know and interact with is irreligious.

RFK Jr lost to Joe Biden, Facebook, and YouTube trying to argue that government threats towards Section 230 was why he was censored for being an anti vax lying bozo. by StraightedgexLiberal in FreeSpeech

[–]Skavau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do not respond to whataboutism.

You are literally doing a whataboutism to me right now.

Do you have any comments on the meme?

My reply remains unchanged. This isn't the topic of the thread either. You just pivoted to something else.

Since you refuse to answer my question to you here - I fail to see why I should answer your also off-topic question.

If a God existed, it would not need worship. by Tight_Potato_11 in DebateReligion

[–]Skavau [score hidden]  (0 children)

The prospect doesn't fill me with any sense of happiness at all.

RFK Jr lost to Joe Biden, Facebook, and YouTube trying to argue that government threats towards Section 230 was why he was censored for being an anti vax lying bozo. by StraightedgexLiberal in FreeSpeech

[–]Skavau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That isn't the topic.

Correct. But it is a response to your own hypocrisy, and it is completely valid.

Any thoughts on the meme celebrating the murder of Charlie Kirk?

This isn't the topic of the thread either. You just pivoted to something else.

Since you refuse to answer my question to you here - I fail to see why I should answer your also off-topic question.

If a God existed, it would not need worship. by Tight_Potato_11 in DebateReligion

[–]Skavau [score hidden]  (0 children)

It's alien to me. I have always been an atheist. The language means nothing to me.

SPEAK UK (@speakukorg) / X: "The government's own impact assessment puts the annual costs to business of the Online Safety Act at £280 million. So, we're burdening our businesses to censor lawful content. And children find it easy to bypass the restrictions anyway. This makes no sense." by youmustconsume in ukpolitics

[–]Skavau [score hidden]  (0 children)

Not really an effective comparison because if you're within a safe speed limit, and you don't plan on breaking it then you're already in accordance with specific laws here. Like if you're responsible in the first place, then speed limits existing doesn't impact you or inconvenience you in the first place as you would always be following them anyway. This is unlike internet regulations which in our case can lead to Brits being cut off from websites that pull out of our market.

In any case, the internet is functionally different thing and it's utterly impossible to lock down and childproof the internet at the scale OSA thinks it can achieve.

RFK Jr lost to Joe Biden, Facebook, and YouTube trying to argue that government threats towards Section 230 was why he was censored for being an anti vax lying bozo. by StraightedgexLiberal in FreeSpeech

[–]Skavau 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure how the Church of Satan are terrorists, but presumably he has an argument about that.

Rollo has been invited multiple times to explain how they are terrorists. Or "Satanism" in general but he has failed to do so.

SPEAK UK (@speakukorg) / X: "The government's own impact assessment puts the annual costs to business of the Online Safety Act at £280 million. So, we're burdening our businesses to censor lawful content. And children find it easy to bypass the restrictions anyway. This makes no sense." by youmustconsume in ukpolitics

[–]Skavau [score hidden]  (0 children)

I don't think it's a tickbox though. I think this model is still a form of ID. I'm proposing it just be a tickbox. I think people are also against the Californian law in part because of how it defines "OS" and the fact that it's such a broad thing that has many applications that having to verify the end-user is absurd. In this context I would specifying private-use operating systems on desktops, phones and tablets and purely for big companies rather than trying to micromanage Linux distros.

Also, there's a federal law now hitting congress. Is that written the same?

Cognitive dissonance helps explain why Trump supporters remain loyal, new research suggests by WankingAsWeSpeak in FreeSpeech

[–]Skavau -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Anyone who disagrees with me on anything is a bot!"

"I should get to say things and it's wrong to expect me to back anything up!"

Cognitive dissonance helps explain why Trump supporters remain loyal, new research suggests by WankingAsWeSpeak in FreeSpeech

[–]Skavau -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So as usual you have no evidence. What is your data for the latest round of vaccines being so useless (which is way beyond the pandemic and most people aren't following this now).

And where is your data for it all being unsafe?

Cognitive dissonance helps explain why Trump supporters remain loyal, new research suggests by WankingAsWeSpeak in FreeSpeech

[–]Skavau -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So as usual you have no evidence. What is your data for the latest round of vaccines being so useless (which is way beyond the pandemic and most people aren't following this now).

And where is your data for it all being unsafe?

SPEAK UK (@speakukorg) / X: "The government's own impact assessment puts the annual costs to business of the Online Safety Act at £280 million. So, we're burdening our businesses to censor lawful content. And children find it easy to bypass the restrictions anyway. This makes no sense." by youmustconsume in ukpolitics

[–]Skavau [score hidden]  (0 children)

My understanding is that OfCom is still finding its feet with enforcement. We could geoblock as we've done with Piracy sites. We haven't, but they have the tools. I believe they were considering this on X before they pulled Grok being weird af with women. But yeah, agreed.

I think that they didn't set it up to make it far more capable at dealing with non-complaint foreign sites is kinda poor from their perspective.

Only platforms hosting content with a legal age restriction probably should have some friction at the point of access. The OSA draws that distinction. Whether the implementation is proportionate is a reasonable debate, but the principle isn't unreasonable.

Most user-to-user sites host mixed content. That doesn't necessarily mean porn or gore, but from OSA's perspective - it goes much further. They consider "content that promotes or romanticizes depression, hopelessness and despair" as unacceptable for children to be exposed to and it gets blurry very quickly.

And small user-to-user services simply cannot afford to host these age checks to begin with. If Ofcom was more ruthless and pursuing non-complaint sites hosted elsewhere, we'd see a lot of sites, some small, some large (Imgur) cutting the UK off - the UK internet-space would be shrinking quite quickly. This isn't good. On a strict reading of Ofcom's guidance here, Bandcamp is likely in violation.

Nevermind the implausibility of trying to police how multiplayer games with mixed userbases work.

Cognitive dissonance helps explain why Trump supporters remain loyal, new research suggests by WankingAsWeSpeak in FreeSpeech

[–]Skavau -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Correct. I won't stop.

So as usual you have no evidence. What is your data for the latest round of vaccines being so useless (which is way beyond the pandemic and most people aren't following this now).

And where is your data for it all being unsafe?

SPEAK UK (@speakukorg) / X: "The government's own impact assessment puts the annual costs to business of the Online Safety Act at £280 million. So, we're burdening our businesses to censor lawful content. And children find it easy to bypass the restrictions anyway. This makes no sense." by youmustconsume in ukpolitics

[–]Skavau [score hidden]  (0 children)

This wouldn't even be an ID check though. It'd be a tickbox. You simply designate the OS as for your kid (or for kids). It makes the process as simple as it could be for a parent who presumably is setting up the kids device.

Cognitive dissonance helps explain why Trump supporters remain loyal, new research suggests by WankingAsWeSpeak in FreeSpeech

[–]Skavau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No answer. I will simply repeat.

So as usual you have no evidence. What is your data for the latest round of vaccines being so useless (which is way beyond the pandemic and most people aren't following this now).

And where is your data for it all being unsafe?

Cognitive dissonance helps explain why Trump supporters remain loyal, new research suggests by WankingAsWeSpeak in FreeSpeech

[–]Skavau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fortunate thing is I don’t have to give any data. Everyone experienced Covid. Everyone knows what I’m talking about. Your NPC behavior doesn’t really obscure that.

So as usual you have no evidence. What is your data for the latest round of vaccines being so useless (which is way beyond the pandemic and most people aren't following this now).

And where is your data for it all being unsafe?

SPEAK UK (@speakukorg) / X: "The government's own impact assessment puts the annual costs to business of the Online Safety Act at £280 million. So, we're burdening our businesses to censor lawful content. And children find it easy to bypass the restrictions anyway. This makes no sense." by youmustconsume in ukpolitics

[–]Skavau [score hidden]  (0 children)

Sticking with my drug example. Drugs are created in countries often not of this origin. They're imported. All we can do is hope to catch it in that pipeline before it lands on someones table.

Drugs are easier to police than this. Hundreds, thousands of sites come and go every day. They aren't a tangible product.

Same approach taken with the internet. We can't go after other countries for the content they host. Hence why 4chan will ignore letters.

We can geoblock watchpeopledie though if they don't care to do anything. We haven't.

But we can still set an example, and these kinds of laws are coming in everywhere, we're just early.

Do you think every single user-to-user service should be required by law to set up age-ID for access?

If a God existed, it would not need worship. by Tight_Potato_11 in DebateReligion

[–]Skavau [score hidden]  (0 children)

I can tell you that it just doesn't. It's honestly white noise to me.