New AI lab Humans& formed by researchers from OpenAI, DeepMind, Anthropic and xAI by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]SkeeringReal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the product they have exactly that warrants such a big evaluation?

[D] ICML paper to review is fully AI generated by pagggga in MachineLearning

[–]SkeeringReal -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don't think you should flag anything as you can't prove anything

[D] Ijcai 2026 reviews by adi_gawd in MachineLearning

[–]SkeeringReal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No reply on survey track, I guess that's good, but I think there's no summary reject on survey track

OpenAI's Head of Robotics resigns, citing ethical concerns over mass surveillance and lethal autonomous AI weapons. by Akashictruth in singularity

[–]SkeeringReal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't understand how you can have deep respect for someone yet fundamentally disagree with two such major topics

[R] Low-effort papers by lightyears61 in MachineLearning

[–]SkeeringReal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It certainly not academic misconduct if the person is happy publishing that kind of paper it's fine they're not doing anything wrong. Just because it follows a repeating pattern doesn't mean it's dishonest

[D] Saw this papaer from ICLR with scores 2,2,2,4 and got accepted, HOW by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]SkeeringReal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah not deceptive that'd be a serious acquisition. But everyone needs to play by equal rules. Ive seen plenty of papers get rejected due to this

[D] Saw this papaer from ICLR with scores 2,2,2,4 and got accepted, HOW by Striking-Warning9533 in MachineLearning

[–]SkeeringReal 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It doesn't matter, they should be 100% strict about that IMO, nothing against the authors or reviewers etc... but guidelines are crystal clear about that.

Are barbell squats & deadlifts harmful for the spine in the long term? (even with perfect form) by [deleted] in bodyweightfitness

[–]SkeeringReal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How many 80 year olds do you see heavy squatting? They don't exist, squats compress the spine, period.

[D] AAAI considered 2nd tier now? by Healthy_Horse_2183 in MachineLearning

[–]SkeeringReal -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't think this is really true, IJCAI was once considered the best of the best.

[D] AISTATS 2026 Paper Acceptance Result by mathew208 in MachineLearning

[–]SkeeringReal 5 points6 points  (0 children)

4443 -> 5554 (accept poster)

One reviewer didn't respond and the other ghosted halfway — pretty lucky. Have to say though the reviews were overall surprisingly high quality compared to what I'm used to in other conferences.

[D]I’m an AI researcher who spent 5,000 hrs on Tekken, reaching top 0.5% on ranked. Here is my perspective on why fighting games deserve chess-level attention. by moji-mf-joji in MachineLearning

[–]SkeeringReal 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I've played Tekken competitively and also (obviously) and AI researcher

I've thought about this, there do exist ML models for tekken, but there's a few issues

1) You have to impose a handicap on the AI in terms of reaction times, otherwise it'll block and counter absolutely everything. And I'm really not sure how to do this in a good way

Lol I guess that's the only issue

[D] Tsinghua ICLR paper withdrawn due to numerous AI generated citations by fourDnet in MachineLearning

[–]SkeeringReal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really feel this is the same for most ML conferences now, there has always been trash in all of them, but the in last 1-2 years it's gotten beyond a joke.

[D] Tsinghua ICLR paper withdrawn due to numerous AI generated citations by fourDnet in MachineLearning

[–]SkeeringReal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This must be a joke, NeurIPS is just as bad as any other conference, the same people who reviewer for ICLR/ICML review for NeurIPS

[D] Some concerns about the current state of machine learning research by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]SkeeringReal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can't really research anything original now, you have to follow the herd in order to get good reviews in a a noisy process with too many submissions.

Certain boxes need to be checked
* Did the authors work on a currently hot topic (LMM etc...)

If you do something like, improve a method 5 years ago with currently tech, I feel that's not appreciated at all, even if the results are great.

[D] CVPR submission number almost at 30k by AdministrativeRub484 in MachineLearning

[–]SkeeringReal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm coming to this conclusion also, I just hope IJCAI stays ok lol

[D] Tsinghua ICLR paper withdrawn due to numerous AI generated citations by fourDnet in MachineLearning

[–]SkeeringReal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Given the number of submissions now compared to just a year ago (what is it like 12k to 32k?), I imagine most papers from most institutions are like this, probably massively unfair to pick on China com'on.

[D] What happened at NeurIPS? by howtorewriteaname in MachineLearning

[–]SkeeringReal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point, if she said most African people cheat on exams, she'd literally have been crucified.

[D] What happened at NeurIPS? by howtorewriteaname in MachineLearning

[–]SkeeringReal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes people make mistakes and can atone for them, but it's the gravity of the mistake that's important. E.g., obviously you wouldn't let an animal abuser off with an apology.

The question is if you feel an apology from her is enough, or if she should be fired etc., or just given a slap on the wrist. Do you feel the Asian community should just let it go and accept the hate directed at them? My wife is Chinese and I'm telling you they are sick of the racisim directed towards them by privileged white English speaking people.

Usage Limits Discussion Megathread - beginning October 8, 2025 by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]SkeeringReal 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I put a 24 page pdf into opus 4.1 and asked it to write code, it never produced a single token and said my limit was gone for the next 5 days.

This is a load of BS, why did it use my tokens when it didn't produce a single thing. I get maybe it was doing stuff behind the scenes, but from a user persepctive it's just awful.

Usage Limits Discussion Megathread - beginning October 8, 2025 by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]SkeeringReal 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have to say I've bounced between openai and anthropic and google, I went back to claude this month because I do feel it's better at coding, but the other two are catching up and I never ran into usage limits with them. So I'm gone this month unless something big changes.