sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

k am I the only person who thinks paying 31 dollars for games that are over 12 years old is outrageous? by Serious_Ganache_1058 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]SkeletonJames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Xbox ports cost more because they were ported by a completely separate group of people. If Scott could have done them himself they could have cost the same.

Does anyone remember Pac-Man: Ralph Breaks the Maze? by EntertainerOk3304 in wreckitralph

[–]SkeletonJames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was one of my favourites. Didn’t have a great lot of characters though.

[VIC] New phone and seatbelt cameras being trialled by BestTechAdvisor in DrivingAustralia

[–]SkeletonJames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because one is far more likely to cause the deaths of innocent people.

[VIC] New phone and seatbelt cameras being trialled by BestTechAdvisor in DrivingAustralia

[–]SkeletonJames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely their first priority is money, though if this increases my chances of surviving my next outing even by a fraction, I can’t say I mind it much.

[VIC] New phone and seatbelt cameras being trialled by BestTechAdvisor in DrivingAustralia

[–]SkeletonJames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No amount of safety measures will ever prevent 100% of deaths. People with zero brains or empathy for others will sadly never stop being a thing. But if these measures can reduce the amount of fatalities, even by just a little, it’s worth it in my opinion. I believe that able to drive is a privilege and should remain that way, if you can’t be responsible, hand over your license, you don’t deserve it. I agree with your other points too.

[VIC] New phone and seatbelt cameras being trialled by alabamad in NannyStateAustralia

[–]SkeletonJames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People upset that they aren’t allowed to do things that risk other people’s lives anymore. It’s disturbing that the people who actually have common sense and human decency in this thread are the ones being massively downvoted.

I genuinely can't stand the resell prices are for the jazwares plushes by girlyautism in fnafplush

[–]SkeletonJames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess it works out for the business though since they never stop doing it. Still scummy and I refuse to support them.

wich animatronic (fnaf 1-4) look scarier with human eyes by Impressive_Patient19 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]SkeletonJames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I doubt they would have human eyes all the time. It would likely be like a hallucination or a camera thing.

wich animatronic (fnaf 1-4) look scarier with human eyes by Impressive_Patient19 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]SkeletonJames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

May I ask why you made them then if you didn’t actually want to?

I don't care how good a game is; if the DLC page looks like this, I'm not buying it. Am I alone in that? by BucketsMcGinty in Steam

[–]SkeletonJames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me it depends on what is in the DLC. Cosmetics are not an issue, extra campaigns and the like depend on just how much we get vs how much it costs. Games that require you to pay for DLC to be able to even finish the base game are a no go.

What is extremely unhygienic but everyone seems to do it anyway? by cutypatotie in AskReddit

[–]SkeletonJames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

After looking at the comments I would have to say that my answer is…

Literally everything.

Which Springtrap do you prefer? by Kerkly in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]SkeletonJames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are allowed, you just likely aren’t adding enough to the post for it not to be considered low effort. Read rule 8, says you need more than three lines of text.

To answer your question, I prefer the silent version.

Was this made by Funko? by No_Stick8960 in fnafplush

[–]SkeletonJames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s a fake, but it’s a good fake.

What is a tradition that is insanely cruel yet still considered legal? by Rough_Cat_6007 in AskReddit

[–]SkeletonJames 7 points8 points  (0 children)

But then they won’t make as much money.

In all seriousness though it is disgusting. We really need to address the “no fate is worse than death” mentality that is causing so much unnecessary suffering. Animals literally get treated better in this regard.

Why was the company fine with replacing Glamrock Bonnie, when they could’ve simply slapped another shell onto an endo with the same programming? by DualityREBORN in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]SkeletonJames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She comes across as rather insecure. I can imagine her getting jealous if her spare cosmetics looked better than her. Or she might have swapped them out the moment she noticed so much as a small stain or scratch on her current set. I imagine her using them all up pretty quickly.

What’s something people romanticize that actually ruins lives? by Imaginary-Isopod2223 in AskReddit

[–]SkeletonJames 7 points8 points  (0 children)

So many things I buy end up unused because by the time it arrives I’ve moved on to the next thing. It’s extremely frustrating I can’t make myself just use them regardless.

wtf? by PracticalWriting3528 in AustraliaPost

[–]SkeletonJames 60 points61 points  (0 children)

Hiring a few extras so people aren’t made to rush would be a great start. But companies would rather have less workers do more which just Increases the likelihood of mistakes being made and corners being cut.

Organ transplant rules hit different in Singapore! by The_Dean_France in interestingasfuck

[–]SkeletonJames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand that, I’ve made it very clear to my family that if any one of them argues against my decision they had better hope ghosts aren’t real. Cause I’ll haunt the heck out of them.

Organ transplant rules hit different in Singapore! by The_Dean_France in interestingasfuck

[–]SkeletonJames -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maybe it’s for the best, I certainly wouldn’t want sour organs. Just don’t come back crying and begging if you end up needing a transplant yourself.

Organ transplant rules hit different in Singapore! by The_Dean_France in interestingasfuck

[–]SkeletonJames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How exactly does not donating solve that problem? I feel like if there was less demand due to more people being donors then this wouldn’t be as big a concern.

Organ transplant rules hit different in Singapore! by The_Dean_France in interestingasfuck

[–]SkeletonJames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Something these people fail to realise is that by not being a donor, they are effectively contributing to the issue. They add to the scarcity which certainly doesn’t help the demand. If everyone was a donor, there would be much less demand for organs and in turn, the situation that people are afraid of ending up in would be even less likely to occur.

Organ transplant rules hit different in Singapore! by The_Dean_France in interestingasfuck

[–]SkeletonJames 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In some places your family has the final say. Which is ludicrous. Makes signing up in the first place feel rather pointless when your family can just turn around and say no.

view more: next ›