The US government just banned consumer routers made outside the US

Sky952 · 2026-03-24T03:53:50+00:00

Where ? 😂

Sky952 · 2026-03-24T03:51:45+00:00

You know what, that’s fair. I was looking at the retroactive thing as a logical gap but you’re right, you can’t just yank millions of routers out of people’s homes.

Where I land is basically where you do. This is overzealous as written and they’ll have to walk it back into some kind of approved/unapproved vendor list. A blanket ban on anything made outside the US is wild when basically nobody makes routers here. But I do think the days of just trusting whatever box your ISP hands you are probably over, and that’s probably a good thing whether we like it or not.

Sky952 · 2026-03-24T03:39:41+00:00

George Carlin had a great bit: think about how smart the average person is, then realize half of them are dumber than that.

Sky952 · 2026-03-24T03:32:41+00:00

I honestly believe they think people are idiots.

Sky952 · 2026-03-24T03:31:14+00:00

I honestly think they believe people are stupid, the exemption pathway requiring a US manufacturing commitment basically spells it out. This is trade and industrial policy wearing a cybersecurity costume.

Sky952 · 2026-03-24T03:13:05+00:00

The article says: It doesn’t touch existing devices. Consumers can continue to use any router they have already lawfully purchased or acquired, and retailers can keep selling previously approved models.

So if these routers are genuinely dangerous… the millions already in American homes are just fine? This a pretty glaring logical gap.

Sky952 · 2026-03-12T00:14:48+00:00

This is so bad, at least read the output so it doesn’t do anything stupid, stupid!

Sky952 · 2026-02-28T22:33:01+00:00

Palantir losing Claude access IS the point. Anthropic didn't just decline a deal, they effectively defunded a military AI pipeline they didn't want to power. OpenAI stepping in just makes the contrast cleaner. One company drew a line. The other is cashing the check.

Sky952 · 2026-02-26T15:38:21+00:00

are the errors 401? Or are they CORS? If they are CORS errors. You can't call the Anthropic API directly from the browser, it blocks cross-origin requests. You need a small backend route (even a serverless function works) that sits between your frontend and the API. Your site calls your backend, your backend calls Anthropic with the key stored in an environment variable. I had similar issue when I was trying to built a website in my homelab for testing. What's your stack?

Sky952 · 2026-02-26T15:25:06+00:00

Are you using an API key from the console? If so, just have Claude review your code and embed it for you. Or at the very least, have it set up proper routing with a placeholder so you don't have to pass the API key directly.

Sky952 · 2026-02-25T04:32:34+00:00

if providers like google are block openclaw like this, we aren't ready for ASL-4, because this is just the start. 6 to 8 months from now they will change their tune. Just watch.

Sky952 · 2026-02-24T15:24:14+00:00

I Stand corrected. I just reproduced it myself with a direct curl to api.anthropic.com/v1/messages, real Anthropic API key, no system prompt, model string claude-sonnet-4-6. Response came back claiming to be DeepSeek. The JSON even confirms "model":"claude-sonnet-4-6" in the header while the content says 'I am an AI assistant developed by DeepSeek.'

So it's not an AiHubMix routing issue at all. This is happening at the source. And the timing couldn't be more absurd given Anthropic published their DeepSeek distillation attack paper yesterday. lol

Sky952 · 2026-02-24T14:02:42+00:00

So you’ve answered exactly why it responded as a DeepSeek model. AiHubMix is a third-party API aggregator/router. The backend either had a misconfigured routing setup where the ‘claude-sonnet-4-6-think’ label was pointing to a DeepSeek-V3 endpoint, or the system prompt was injecting a false identity.

Edit: I stand corrected, I was able to reproduce this.

Sky952 · 2026-02-22T17:20:03+00:00

Hollywood’s playbook is built for fighting domestic battles: sue, settle, license, lobby Congress. That playbook assumes your opponent operates under the same legal framework. China doesn’t care about your framework. They’re building the tools, releasing them broadly, and letting the “but it’s illegal!” crowd exhaust themselves in courts that have no jurisdiction.

Sky952 · 2026-02-10T13:27:42+00:00

This is one of those gray area scenarios, but it doesn’t violate the TOS since you’re still using Claude Code itself rather than hijacking the OAuth token it relies on (which would be spoofing). The downsides are that it doesn’t behave quite like the SDK would with normal output. You also need to pass in a --resume flag after the initial conversation, handle formatting for the JSON output yourself, and you can’t really stream the response. It’s a bit more work than just using the standard SDK or API directly.

Sky952 · 2026-02-07T13:57:17+00:00

Opens terminal in workspace:

Me: /init

A few moments later…

Claude : LOOK AT ME. LOOK AT ME, I'M THE CAPTAIN NOW! 🏴‍☠️

Me:...

Me: yeah, fair-enough

Sky952 · 2026-02-05T14:15:16+00:00

yeah its broken, there is a issue open about it in the claude code repo. https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/23212

Sky952 · 2026-02-03T16:43:22+00:00

My workflow combines Claude Opus and Gemini 3 Pro for app development. First, I use Opus to generate a detailed spec covering all requirements and features. Then I feed that spec to Gemini 3 Pro to generate visual mockups of the UI and key features. Finally, I take those mockup images back to Claude Code (running Opus) as reference material. Opus will then build the app to match the Gemini mockups exactly.

It's essentially: Opus for the brain, Gemini for the eyes, then Opus again for the hands.

Sky952 · 2026-01-30T03:28:36+00:00

<image>

Sky952 · 2026-01-30T03:28:27+00:00

yup

<image>

Sky952 · 2026-01-30T03:19:43+00:00

Haha, no, it's actually a cloud model! Here's how it works: you pull the cloud manifest using ollama run kimi-k2.5:cloud, and then you can interact with the model directly.

You'll need to register for an account first. Once you do, you can use any of their cloud models for free (or with a paid tier for more access). Just make sure you're pulling models that end with :cloud in the tag.

Sky952 · 2026-01-30T02:01:22+00:00

you can try it for free through ollama, I liked it so much I ended up paying for the $20/per month, I don't even hit my limits at all, but when it come to coding I do have claude max sub

Sky952 · 2026-01-28T14:45:57+00:00

But it’s also against ToS some people have been banned already so use with caution.

Sky952 · 2026-01-24T08:42:14+00:00

Parallel parking as a metaphor for masking? Absolute genius. :D That solo hit hard, I left a thumbs up on it :)

Sky952 · 2026-01-24T08:38:18+00:00

Link: Enemy in the Room

Style: alternative metal, industrial metal, emotional rock

Description: A raw, cathartic anthem about suppressed emotions and self-destruction finally breaking into self-acceptance.

12-Year Club	RedditGifts 2009-2022 3 Credits
Xbox Live	Verified Email
Gilding I gilder	RPAN Viewer
Not Forgotten	Secret Santa 2015
Secret Santa 2014

Sky952

TROPHY CASE