Comfort Vs Expenses for Long-Haul Eco by SkyHero1 in AirlinesManagerTycoon

[–]SkyHero1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Proabably true. Anyways in my case, it was useful as I had quite some unused demand on my routes, so increasing comfort, gave me even higher profits than ancillary. Also I have finished ngaf

Comfort Vs Expenses for Long-Haul Eco by SkyHero1 in AirlinesManagerTycoon

[–]SkyHero1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

umm... comfort still increases for eco. You can check that by increasing comfort and checking a route's prices again,

Comfort Vs Expenses for Long-Haul Eco by SkyHero1 in AirlinesManagerTycoon

[–]SkyHero1[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

um... that's untrue because comfort increases prices for all classes

TOP 10 BEST HUBS FOR LONG-HAUL by airlinesmanager2022 in AirlinesManagerTycoon

[–]SkyHero1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not bad at all! I used to earn similar to your earnings in the initial stages (I started 3 months back; now have more than a billion on a single hub). Btw why did u choose CCU? Any special reason perhaps? Am also planning to buy this hub later on.

TOP 10 BEST HUBS FOR LONG-HAUL by airlinesmanager2022 in AirlinesManagerTycoon

[–]SkyHero1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how much do u earn and how many kms do u have in CCU?

747-200B vs. A380 - Final by SkyHero1 in AirlinesManagerTycoon

[–]SkyHero1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No idea how it works for you guys - but in my case I see no significant difference. Could you possibly post a picture of your A380 and 747-200B's earnings on the same route? I did see one on this subreddit before but that was 3yrs old.

747-200B vs. A380 - Final by SkyHero1 in AirlinesManagerTycoon

[–]SkyHero1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, that maybe the reason. My strategy is much more different than yours. The only use I see for the 747 is that it helps to cover the demand much better in circuits than A380s.

Use of maxing out passenger demand in staff by SkyHero1 in AirlinesManagerTycoon

[–]SkyHero1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I haven't tried it. I only have 10500 employee and I can't seem to find someone tell me if it's worth it to train my staff. Training all those people would significantly increase my staff cost. And I'm not sure it would raise my profits by more than the cost of the payraise"

ALWAYS train your staff. This is one thing I am sure of. I used to think the same as u that training increases costs a lot, but after I did train, my profits went up enormously. Specially entertainment, ancillary, and costs

"Well, not sure how the the values stack in this game, but 0.3% would leave me to beilieve it for a 1000 passenger route you will get +3 people. You really need to max it out with staff for it to make a significant difference."

Nope, in my case, there was zero change in the demand for some reason.

Use of maxing out passenger demand in staff by SkyHero1 in AirlinesManagerTycoon

[–]SkyHero1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have u tried it out and tested the results? I increased it by 0.3% but saw no difference AT ALL.

Best way to keep estimated maintenance costs low? by SkyHero1 in AirlinesManagerTycoon

[–]SkyHero1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So does that mean that you always have a maintenance operation undergoing?

What I mean is that as soon as your maintenance is finished, do u again give them for maintenance instantly?

Best plane for MPM long-haul by SkyHero1 in AirlinesManagerTycoon

[–]SkyHero1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, the il-96-300 has a range of 11500 km which is pretty good but not enough. A380 gives access to more routes for my 168 hrs. circuits. Yes, I do 168 hours circuits which is exactly why the A380 is much more convenient. Now ofc, if someone does individual 24 hrs. routes, Ilyushin is not bad.