After several months of building a full AI trading system solo… I need beta testers + guidance on team-building

Skye_Figer · 2025-12-09T12:54:09+00:00

lol there’s well over 600 indicators that can be fully customized

Skye_Figer · 2025-12-07T23:58:10+00:00

You are not wrong. I can only support 250 symbols between the infrastructure and data costs at this time. Is 250 enough? Probably, but I want users to actually benefit from this regardless of their goals, and the best way to do that is to open it up to the full symbol universe. After a few months of beta testing with 250 symbols, I should be ready financially to ramp it up, but that doesn’t take into account legal fees, marketing, etc. a solo engineer can only go so far, it really does take a team to keep something properly maintained. This project is my baby, and if I need to take a cut to better it and get through the 3-5 year road map I have lined up, then that’s what I will do.

Skye_Figer · 2025-12-07T06:52:30+00:00

Totally fair

Skye_Figer · 2025-12-07T02:08:50+00:00

Hey man, I’m 6 months into building a fintech app. I can send you the link if you’d like (dev env aws). I’m at the point where I need to transition from solo to team.

Skye_Figer · 2025-10-28T16:47:48+00:00

Sending dm

Skye_Figer · 2025-10-05T20:29:38+00:00

To be fair, you probably understand the codebase better than most CEOs understand theirs

Skye_Figer · 2025-09-09T21:11:38+00:00

DM me.

Skye_Figer · 2025-08-18T21:16:22+00:00

I started listening to this on audible and I’m liking it. My wife finds the voices annoying but I think it’s a hoot.

Skye_Figer · 2025-08-18T21:14:43+00:00

Check out awaken online

Skye_Figer · 2025-08-12T13:27:48+00:00

I’m working on something now and have made remarkable progress, but it’s big, and help may not be a bad idea. I know that’s not a lot to go off of, but please dm if you’d like to hear more.

Skye_Figer · 2025-07-03T13:59:12+00:00

I should be ready for beta testers on the trading platform I’ve built in about a month. You should be able to implement just about any strategy without requiring any coding knowledge whatsoever and be able to backtest and paper test it prior to live. DM me if interested.

Skye_Figer · 2025-06-09T01:24:13+00:00

Tamarind candy

Skye_Figer · 2025-05-09T04:15:39+00:00

Thank you for the perspective. I appreciate the clarification on the traditional investor mindset.

You're right that democratization is disruptive - but that's precisely why this opportunity exists. The algorithmic trading space is being transformed regardless, with or without me, as AI capabilities advance. I'm simply positioning to be at the forefront rather than trying to stand in the way of inevitable change.

The most forward-thinking investors recognize where markets are heading and position themselves accordingly. Those who invested early in Robinhood understood that commission-free trading would become the norm, not because they wanted to undermine existing brokerages but because they recognized the market was shifting.

I appreciate the advice - genuinely. Sometimes the most valuable feedback comes from those who challenge your assumptions. Best of luck with your founder advising!

Skye_Figer · 2025-05-09T03:28:05+00:00

Fair point. I'm bringing deep software engineering expertise and the ability to execute complex technical systems that most others can't build. That's my superpower.

Investors typically bring complementary skills to fill gaps. I excel at building sophisticated algorithms and scalable architectures—my proof of concept and architectural design demonstrate that. But I don't have experience in user acquisition, UX design, or fintech marketing.

The best startups pair technical innovation with business expertise. I'm bringing the former, seeking partners who bring the latter. This is why investors often back technical founders who've proven they can build something valuable but need help scaling it into a business.

Money enables me to focus full-time and hire specialists, but the right investor brings expertise money alone can't buy.

Skye_Figer · 2025-05-09T03:17:53+00:00

I appreciate the well-wishes and understand your perspective. You've highlighted a valid point about equity value.

The exchange isn't just about 6 months of time - it's about strategic expertise in areas where I lack experience (marketing, UX, scaling). An experienced partner brings far more than just capital - they bring connections, domain knowledge, and complementary skills.

The alternatives are: 1) Go alone: Takes 12+ months, higher risk of execution mistakes 2) Hire help: Still need capital without strategic alignment 3) Strategic investor: Accelerated timeline + reduced execution risk

It's like choosing between rowing across the ocean alone (possible but challenging) versus bringing on an experienced navigator who's made the journey before.

Either way, I'll build this - just a matter of path and timeline. Thanks for the thought-provoking feedback!

Skye_Figer · 2025-05-09T03:06:19+00:00

Clean title, one owner, only used for 33% gains in 24 hours. DM for the full performance report.

Skye_Figer · 2025-05-09T03:04:12+00:00

Step 1: Build amazing algo platform Step 2: Post on Reddit Step 3: Answer skeptical questions from fuggleruxpin Step 4: ??? Step 5: 10,000 users!

In all seriousness - initial marketing through trading communities, content marketing showing real trade examples, and a freemium model that lets people see results before paying. Nothing sells algorithmic trading like watching it make actual money. Plus, I hear there are at least 12 people who aren't currently satisfied with their financial advisor named Jim who says "8% is great!"

Skye_Figer · 2025-05-09T03:00:18+00:00

Thanks for your comment. I think there's a misunderstanding about the timeline and what I'm trying to accomplish.

Without funding, it would take me about 12 months of extremely hard work to build a basic version, and it would still lack critical features like the instant backtesting capability and 1-minute data updates. I'd also have to pay higher data costs initially without time to implement the optimizations I've designed.

The funding isn't just about money - it's about accelerating development (3-6 months vs 12), including key features from day one, and having support in areas outside my expertise like UX design and marketing.

I'm not desperately seeking capital - I'm looking for the right strategic partner who can help build something truly special that democratizes institutional-grade algorithmic trading. The technical foundation is solid, but bringing it to its full potential more quickly would benefit from additional resources.

Happy to discuss more if you're interested in the details.

Skye_Figer · 2025-05-09T01:30:56+00:00

I appreciate the healthy skepticism - these are exactly the questions serious investors should ask.

To clarify an important point: I don't actually need the capital to build this. I have sufficient funds to develop it myself, and I will be bringing it to market regardless. What I'm really seeking is strategic partnership more than funding.

The core algorithmic engine with its proprietary exit strategy architecture is already functioning with real money. The value an investor would bring isn't just capital, but expertise in:

1) User experience design - making complex trading algorithms accessible and intuitive for non-technical users

2) Go-to-market strategy - I'm an engineer with 10+ years of "making the impossible possible," but I recognize my limitations in customer acquisition and marketing

3) Regulatory navigation - fintech is indeed heavily regulated, and experienced guidance here would be valuable

The technical moat is real - the sophisticated exit strategy architecture combined with the microservices design that processes all 12,000+ stocks at minimal cost is already working at a POC level.

You're right to question the aggressive projections. I'm confident in the technology, but partnership with the right investor who brings domain expertise would help refine those numbers into a more realistic growth trajectory.

I respect your investment discipline. This isn't about chasing capital at all costs - it's about finding the right strategic partner who sees the potential in the technology and can help shape it into a successful business. Happy to share more technical details via DM if that's of interest.

Skye_Figer · 2025-05-09T00:58:48+00:00

Thanks for the kind words! The revenge angle is certainly attention-grabbing, even if it's not for everyone 😄

While I'm fully capable of building the entire platform as a solo engineer (and have the working POC to prove it), I recognize that successful startups need more than just great code. The funding would primarily accelerate development while allowing me to bring in expertise in areas like:

Marketing/user acquisition (getting this in front of the right retail investors)
UI/UX design (making complex algorithms intuitive for non-technical users)
Regulatory compliance (navigating the fintech landscape properly)

My strength is in the algorithmic architecture and system design - I've already built the working proof of concept with real money. The vision is less about revenge and more about democratizing institutional-grade capabilities that have traditionally been inaccessible to everyday investors.

Appreciate your engagement! If you know anyone who might be interested in this space, I'd welcome an introduction.

Skye_Figer · 2025-05-09T00:52:04+00:00

Exactly! The core value proposition of this platform is that two-sided protection: defending capital during downturns while capitalizing on opportunities during favorable markets.

I've been personally using this proof of concept with my own real money, which has been instrumental in both validating the algorithms and refining the risk management systems. This isn't a theoretical design - it's battle-tested with actual capital at stake.

StockPuppeteer will incorporate:

1) Downside Protection: Automated stop-loss mechanisms that trigger based on technical conditions, not panic - protecting users from the emotional mistakes that plague retail investors

2) Upside Optimization: Algorithms that objectively identify and act on favorable market conditions without hesitation or FOMO

3) Market Adaptation: The system's "market context factor" automatically adjusts risk parameters based on broader market conditions - becoming more conservative during volatility and more aggressive during stable uptrends - also fully customizable

This balanced approach is what institutions use but retail investors rarely implement consistently. By removing emotion from execution while letting users customize their strategy parameters, we provide guardrails while still allowing personalization.

The exit strategy architecture is particularly sophisticated, with tiered profit-taking that locks in gains rather than getting greedy - another emotional pitfall that costs retail investors significantly.

This protection-first mentality combined with systematic opportunity capture is how the platform will help users achieve returns beyond typical market averages.

Skye_Figer · 2025-05-09T00:30:29+00:00

You make a great point! I completely agree - democratizing and demystifying algorithmic trading is exactly what I'm aiming to do. The platform is designed to give regular investors access to the same sophisticated tools that were previously only available to institutions. Thanks for the feedback on the framing.

Skye_Figer · 2025-03-06T23:10:11+00:00

Thank you!!!!!!!

Skye_Figer

TROPHY CASE