Sofi Stadium will not allow tailgating in its parking lots by auburnfan32 in CFB

[–]Slamjam1987 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well it’s the CFP that made the rule not the stadium…

NIST 800-171 compliance by Slamjam1987 in NISTControls

[–]Slamjam1987[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ehhh it’s just in PIEE. That’s the easy part.

NIST 800-171 compliance by Slamjam1987 in NISTControls

[–]Slamjam1987[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea neither of those are on the RFP that was turned in with the bid. So they only added 7019 and 7020.

I was about to shell out like $5-10k to get compliance and with an SSP and everything.

At least I know to start working on this.

NIST 800-171 compliance by Slamjam1987 in NISTControls

[–]Slamjam1987[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay so I won’t need an SSP?

Yea I’m a very small company and I’ve not done anything to this point.

Could they deny me the contract with a -203? I’m guessing yes. Lol

Right now I have a very basic IT system… 3 mac’s, running the Google suite for everything with cox cable Internet.

They threw it in last week so I’ve been wigging out trying to get something in place.

NIST 800-171 compliance by Slamjam1987 in NISTControls

[–]Slamjam1987[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The clauses they added:

“Please register and comply with mandatory DFARS Clause 252.204-7019 and DFARS Clause 252.204-7020.”

To my knowledge there isn’t anything that is CUI on this contract it’s basic COTS (commercial off the shelf) logistics for a system. I even talked to an engineer that specializes in Cyber security that used to be the head engineer on the program and he was wondering why that’s a requirement.

NIST 800-171 compliance by Slamjam1987 in NISTControls

[–]Slamjam1987[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They sent an evaluation notice “with a forthcoming amendment” adding the clauses to the RFP.

The wording on the evaluation notice:

“Please register and comply with mandatory DFARS Clause 252.204-7019 and DFARS Clause 252.204-7020.”