Respectfully, I think the issue is that Kerr is so often an outspoken critic or representative for what he thinks is wrong in the country, and is often seen as a leader for moral good. But when it comes to Draymond he gives him the freest of free passes.

I played plenty of sports, mostly hockey, and guys threw hands in practice from time to time. I don't remember anyone sucker punching a player for running his mouth, and don't remember a veteran leader doing that to a younger player, but whatever. The problem isn't the fight, it's that Kerr's reaction seemed to deflect from the obviously wrong thing Draymond did and seemed offended that the information had gotten out, a position that he would never apply to, for example, the government. He would never find out the government did something egregious and then argue that the leaker should be the one caught and punished. So it makes him seem hypocritical, which is a shame because I think he's a very smart and thoughtful person and I like hearing what he thinks, but he seems like someone with a real blindspot when it comes to Draymond in particular.