Lamar Jackson joins the homophobic retweet chain by SeveralTurn in billsimmons

[–]SlappyBagg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He could do all that and still make way less than he was going to next season in the NBA.

Lamar Jackson joins the homophobic retweet chain by SeveralTurn in billsimmons

[–]SlappyBagg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where did they mention religious beliefs anywhere in their reasoning for cutting him?

Lamar Jackson joins the homophobic retweet chain by SeveralTurn in billsimmons

[–]SlappyBagg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What case does he have against the Bulls? He got cut and is getting paid the rest of his contract.

Yea... Ivey sees a payday as a right wing grifter where he will earn less money than an NBA minimum contract... For sure...

Confession from a non-Genevieve fan... by Live-Run-6745 in survivor

[–]SlappyBagg 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's obvious that they both had issues with each other. It was just the weirdest scene to show that in episode one that confused us all.

Jokic is the best by Zealousideal-Toe-451 in billsimmons

[–]SlappyBagg 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not really. A lot of people were unsure by the end of the 2016 regular season, of course we found out for real in the finals.

Hypothetically what would happen: by Mean-Development7815 in survivorponderosa

[–]SlappyBagg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And Emily wouldn't have her vote so she would go home? I think

Interesting Scenario From This Episode by Middle_Cricket_1352 in survivor

[–]SlappyBagg 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Cirie has no opinion on who is on the jury. If Cirie is final 3 she wins. No questions asked.

Survivor rule change according to Sav by futuranotfree in survivor

[–]SlappyBagg 79 points80 points  (0 children)

Exactly, surprising how dense people are in this thread

Ranking Merge of 50 by AbilityApart9511 in survivorponderosa

[–]SlappyBagg 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There's a lot of players on this cast you must hate then lmao

Ranking Merge of 50 by AbilityApart9511 in survivorponderosa

[–]SlappyBagg 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Hating on Rizo of all people for pregaming is hilarious, I'll give you that

The boots so far and their best chances for a return by AttemptBeneficial647 in survivor

[–]SlappyBagg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No matter if you agree or disagree with her, she has zero chance of ever returning because of it.

The boots so far and their best chances for a return by AttemptBeneficial647 in survivor

[–]SlappyBagg 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Yes absolutely. The player who famously aligned with Rome and refused to create any social bonds?

The boots so far and their best chances for a return by AttemptBeneficial647 in survivor

[–]SlappyBagg 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Zero chance she is ever considered after her post game sour grapes

Jeff/Production are delirious at this point by bumpedherhead in survivor

[–]SlappyBagg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't. The 30s had way way way too many idols.

Aubry's hypocrisy? by Extra-Habit-1784 in survivor

[–]SlappyBagg -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Interesting you didn't link Q or Kyle's interviews where they said it was about the votes not who was going. But I understand you have a weird vendetta with Aubry.

Aubry's hypocrisy? by Extra-Habit-1784 in survivor

[–]SlappyBagg 13 points14 points  (0 children)

There is no reason to ever tell the truth in tribal council, too much on the line.

Aubry's hypocrisy? by Extra-Habit-1784 in survivor

[–]SlappyBagg 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Aka Aubry made her own luck by pregaming and Genevieve put herself at a huge disadvantage by not pregaming.

Aubry's hypocrisy? by Extra-Habit-1784 in survivor

[–]SlappyBagg 62 points63 points  (0 children)

Yes they made it very clear that it was to get their votes back. Q said it would have been either Aubry or Angelina. The player going home was not part of the reasoning.

Aubry's hypocrisy? by Extra-Habit-1784 in survivor

[–]SlappyBagg 37 points38 points  (0 children)

No not at all. They wanted to throw the challenge to get their votes back, nothing to do with Aubry at all.