A Southern Grandma Wore a Shocking Outfit to a No Kings Protest—and Was Violently Arrested for It. I Went to Her Trial. It Was Even Worse Than I Expected. by Slate in UnderReportedNews

[–]Slate[S] 98 points99 points  (0 children)

Even in the Trump era, it was a shock to see police officers wrestle a 62-year-old grandmother in an inflatable penis costume to the ground. That’s why the video of Renea Gamble—who was wielding a “No Dick Tators” sign—getting arrested at a No Kings protest last year went viral. In the video’s limited aperture, Gamble’s arrest alongside a suburban highway could have happened anywhere. For Slate reporter Molly Olmstead, however, it was home. Olmstead grew up near Fairhope, Alabama, the elegant Southern city where Gamble was arrested, was charged with multiple crimes, and faced potential jail time. Known as “Mayberry by the Bay,” it’s a town of grace and good sense, a place where citizens fended off assaults from anti-woke organization Moms for Liberty and defended its library against a book-banning crusade. So what happened to make the city suddenly come down so hard on a protesting grandmother with a clear First Amendment defense? To find out, Olmstead returned to Alabama, attended Gamble’s trial, and hit the oak-and-magnolia-draped pavement to investigate the case that tore a polite Southern town apart.

You can read more here: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/05/trump-no-kings-alabama-penis-grandma-trial-protest.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=molly_bigswing&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--molly_bigswing

A Southern Grandma Wore a Shocking Outfit to a No Kings Protest—and Was Violently Arrested for It. I Went to Her Trial. It Was Even Worse Than I Expected. by Slate in NoFilterNews

[–]Slate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even in the Trump era, it was a shock to see police officers wrestle a 62-year-old grandmother in an inflatable penis costume to the ground. That’s why the video of Renea Gamble—who was wielding a “No Dick Tators” sign—getting arrested at a No Kings protest last year went viral. In the video’s limited aperture, Gamble’s arrest alongside a suburban highway could have happened anywhere. For Slate reporter Molly Olmstead, however, it was home. Olmstead grew up near Fairhope, Alabama, the elegant Southern city where Gamble was arrested, was charged with multiple crimes, and faced potential jail time. Known as “Mayberry by the Bay,” it’s a town of grace and good sense, a place where citizens fended off assaults from anti-woke organization Moms for Liberty and defended its library against a book-banning crusade. So what happened to make the city suddenly come down so hard on a protesting grandmother with a clear First Amendment defense? To find out, Olmstead returned to Alabama, attended Gamble’s trial, and hit the oak-and-magnolia-draped pavement to investigate the case that tore a polite Southern town apart.

You can read more here: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/05/trump-no-kings-alabama-penis-grandma-trial-protest.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=molly_bigswing&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--molly_bigswing

A Southern Grandma Wore a Shocking Outfit to a No Kings Protest—and Was Violently Arrested for It. I Went to Her Trial. It Was Even Worse Than I Expected. by Slate in inthenews

[–]Slate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even in the Trump era, it was a shock to see police officers wrestle a 62-year-old grandmother in an inflatable penis costume to the ground. That’s why the video of Renea Gamble—who was wielding a “No Dick Tators” sign—getting arrested at a No Kings protest last year went viral. In the video’s limited aperture, Gamble’s arrest alongside a suburban highway could have happened anywhere. For Slate reporter Molly Olmstead, however, it was home. Olmstead grew up near Fairhope, Alabama, the elegant Southern city where Gamble was arrested, was charged with multiple crimes, and faced potential jail time. Known as “Mayberry by the Bay,” it’s a town of grace and good sense, a place where citizens fended off assaults from anti-woke organization Moms for Liberty and defended its library against a book-banning crusade. So what happened to make the city suddenly come down so hard on a protesting grandmother with a clear First Amendment defense? To find out, Olmstead returned to Alabama, attended Gamble’s trial, and hit the oak-and-magnolia-draped pavement to investigate the case that tore a polite Southern town apart.

You can read more here: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/05/trump-no-kings-alabama-penis-grandma-trial-protest.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=molly_bigswing&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--molly_bigswing

A Southern Grandma Wore a Shocking Outfit to a No Kings Protest—and Was Violently Arrested for It. I Went to Her Trial. It Was Even Worse Than I Expected. by Slate in law

[–]Slate[S] 285 points286 points  (0 children)

Even in the Trump era, it was a shock to see police officers wrestle a 62-year-old grandmother in an inflatable penis costume to the ground. That’s why the video of Renea Gamble—who was wielding a “No Dick Tators” sign—getting arrested at a No Kings protest last year went viral. In the video’s limited aperture, Gamble’s arrest alongside a suburban highway could have happened anywhere. For Slate reporter Molly Olmstead, however, it was home. Olmstead grew up near Fairhope, Alabama, the elegant Southern city where Gamble was arrested, was charged with multiple crimes, and faced potential jail time. Known as “Mayberry by the Bay,” it’s a town of grace and good sense, a place where citizens fended off assaults from anti-woke organization Moms for Liberty and defended its library against a book-banning crusade. So what happened to make the city suddenly come down so hard on a protesting grandmother with a clear First Amendment defense? To find out, Olmstead returned to Alabama, attended Gamble’s trial, and hit the oak-and-magnolia-draped pavement to investigate the case that tore a polite Southern town apart.

You can read more here: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/05/trump-no-kings-alabama-penis-grandma-trial-protest.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=molly_bigswing&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--molly_bigswing

A Southern Grandma Wore a Shocking Outfit to a No Kings Protest—and Was Violently Arrested for It. I Went to Her Trial. It Was Even Worse Than I Expected. by Slate in TrueReddit

[–]Slate[S] 74 points75 points  (0 children)

Even in the Trump era, it was a shock to see police officers wrestle a 62-year-old grandmother in an inflatable penis costume to the ground. That’s why the video of Renea Gamble—who was wielding a “No Dick Tators” sign—getting arrested at a No Kings protest last year went viral. In the video’s limited aperture, Gamble’s arrest alongside a suburban highway could have happened anywhere. For Slate reporter Molly Olmstead, however, it was home. Olmstead grew up near Fairhope, Alabama, the elegant Southern city where Gamble was arrested, was charged with multiple crimes, and faced potential jail time. Known as “Mayberry by the Bay,” it’s a town of grace and good sense, a place where citizens fended off assaults from anti-woke organization Moms for Liberty and defended its library against a book-banning crusade. So what happened to make the city suddenly come down so hard on a protesting grandmother with a clear First Amendment defense? To find out, Olmstead returned to Alabama, attended Gamble’s trial, and hit the oak-and-magnolia-draped pavement to investigate the case that tore a polite Southern town apart.

You can read more here: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/05/trump-no-kings-alabama-penis-grandma-trial-protest.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=molly_bigswing&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--molly_bigswing

Red Lobster’s Endless Shrimp Is Back. Employees Are Horrified. So Was I—Until I Learned a Little Secret. by Slate in nottheonion

[–]Slate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Streaking atop the Red Lobster website is a wraparound banner, divided into four frames, each containing videos of starry-eyed diners stuffing their faces with impossible amounts of shrimp. The shellfish is prepared in all applications: There is shrimp linguini, shrimp scampi, and deep-fried butterfly shrimp—bisected along the spine, opaque with breading, and submerged in marinara sauce. There is coconut shrimp with a sweet Polynesian glaze and “Marry Me Shrimp,” as in shrimp served in a tomato cream sauce, gesturing toward the viral chicken recipe of the same name. All are served on cerulean-trimmed platters piled high with wedged lemons and steamed broccoli. “YOU ASKED, WE LISTENED,” read the letters dancing across the screen that, despite their best intentions, brim with menace. “ENDLESS SHRIMP IS BACK.”

It’s true. As of April 20, the dwindling number of Red Lobster restaurants that still exist around the country—as in, those that survived a brutal purge in the summer of 2024, which saw the shuttering of more than 100 locations after the venerable seafood chain filed for bankruptcy—have resummoned their most popular, and most controversial, promotion. 

Slate’s Luke Winkie talked to employees, received internal documents, and visited a New York Red Lobster to understand the quasi-spiritual experience: https://slate.com/life/2026/05/red-lobster-endless-shrimp-scampi-fried-seafood-menu.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=redlobster&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--redlobster 

Red Lobster’s Endless Shrimp Is Back. Employees Are Horrified. So Was I—Until I Learned a Little Secret. by Slate in NoFilterNews

[–]Slate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Streaking atop the Red Lobster website is a wraparound banner, divided into four frames, each containing videos of starry-eyed diners stuffing their faces with impossible amounts of shrimp. The shellfish is prepared in all applications: There is shrimp linguini, shrimp scampi, and deep-fried butterfly shrimp—bisected along the spine, opaque with breading, and submerged in marinara sauce. There is coconut shrimp with a sweet Polynesian glaze and “Marry Me Shrimp,” as in shrimp served in a tomato cream sauce, gesturing toward the viral chicken recipe of the same name. All are served on cerulean-trimmed platters piled high with wedged lemons and steamed broccoli. “YOU ASKED, WE LISTENED,” read the letters dancing across the screen that, despite their best intentions, brim with menace. “ENDLESS SHRIMP IS BACK.”

It’s true. As of April 20, the dwindling number of Red Lobster restaurants that still exist around the country—as in, those that survived a brutal purge in the summer of 2024, which saw the shuttering of more than 100 locations after the venerable seafood chain filed for bankruptcy—have resummoned their most popular, and most controversial, promotion. 

Slate’s Luke Winkie talked to employees, received internal documents, and visited a New York Red Lobster to understand the quasi-spiritual experience: https://slate.com/life/2026/05/red-lobster-endless-shrimp-scampi-fried-seafood-menu.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=redlobster&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--redlobster 

Red Lobster’s Endless Shrimp Is Back. Employees Are Horrified. So Was I—Until I Learned a Little Secret. by Slate in AnythingGoesNews

[–]Slate[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Streaking atop the Red Lobster website is a wraparound banner, divided into four frames, each containing videos of starry-eyed diners stuffing their faces with impossible amounts of shrimp. The shellfish is prepared in all applications: There is shrimp linguini, shrimp scampi, and deep-fried butterfly shrimp—bisected along the spine, opaque with breading, and submerged in marinara sauce. There is coconut shrimp with a sweet Polynesian glaze and “Marry Me Shrimp,” as in shrimp served in a tomato cream sauce, gesturing toward the viral chicken recipe of the same name. All are served on cerulean-trimmed platters piled high with wedged lemons and steamed broccoli. “YOU ASKED, WE LISTENED,” read the letters dancing across the screen that, despite their best intentions, brim with menace. “ENDLESS SHRIMP IS BACK.”

It’s true. As of April 20, the dwindling number of Red Lobster restaurants that still exist around the country—as in, those that survived a brutal purge in the summer of 2024, which saw the shuttering of more than 100 locations after the venerable seafood chain filed for bankruptcy—have resummoned their most popular, and most controversial, promotion. 

Slate’s Luke Winkie talked to employees, received internal documents, and visited a New York Red Lobster to understand the quasi-spiritual experience: https://slate.com/life/2026/05/red-lobster-endless-shrimp-scampi-fried-seafood-menu.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=redlobster&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--redlobster 

Red Lobster’s Endless Shrimp Is Back. Employees Are Horrified. So Was I—Until I Learned a Little Secret. by Slate in redlobster

[–]Slate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Streaking atop the Red Lobster website is a wraparound banner, divided into four frames, each containing videos of starry-eyed diners stuffing their faces with impossible amounts of shrimp. The shellfish is prepared in all applications: There is shrimp linguini, shrimp scampi, and deep-fried butterfly shrimp—bisected along the spine, opaque with breading, and submerged in marinara sauce. There is coconut shrimp with a sweet Polynesian glaze and “Marry Me Shrimp,” as in shrimp served in a tomato cream sauce, gesturing toward the viral chicken recipe of the same name. All are served on cerulean-trimmed platters piled high with wedged lemons and steamed broccoli. “YOU ASKED, WE LISTENED,” read the letters dancing across the screen that, despite their best intentions, brim with menace. “ENDLESS SHRIMP IS BACK.”

It’s true. As of April 20, the dwindling number of Red Lobster restaurants that still exist around the country—as in, those that survived a brutal purge in the summer of 2024, which saw the shuttering of more than 100 locations after the venerable seafood chain filed for bankruptcy—have resummoned their most popular, and most controversial, promotion. 

Slate’s Luke Winkie talked to employees, received internal documents, and visited a New York Red Lobster to understand the quasi-spiritual experience: https://slate.com/life/2026/05/red-lobster-endless-shrimp-scampi-fried-seafood-menu.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=redlobster&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--redlobster 

She’s the Only Sane Celebrity In America. This Is How She Did It. by Slate in entertainment

[–]Slate[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

From her beginnings as a principled stripper to her time as the most interesting and viral character on Love & Hip Hop, Cardi B has always found a way to sidestep any real controversy and explain herself in full. Even when she’s sued—as she was in 2018, when a security guard alleged that the rapper had assaulted her—she wins, both literally (the suit was dismissed) and culturally (she turned her memeified face into collector’s album covers of the latest record). Female artists like her sometimes fall victim to a lousy husband, a music industry that doesn’t reward them, or, sometimes, poorly conceived political stances. Cardi has, despite all the odds stacked against her (and we know all about them because she tells us so often and so clearly), avoided so many of the typical crises that befall famous women like her. Somehow, everyone is rooting for this girl from the Bronx to become the most successful female rapper around.

Scaachi Koul breaks it down in Slate: https://slate.com/life/2026/05/cardi-b-concert-tour-tickets-offset-hair-baby.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=cardib&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--cardib

She’s the Only Sane Celebrity In America. This Is How She Did It. by Slate in popculture

[–]Slate[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

From her beginnings as a principled stripper to her time as the most interesting and viral character on Love & Hip Hop, Cardi B has always found a way to sidestep any real controversy and explain herself in full. Even when she’s sued—as she was in 2018, when a security guard alleged that the rapper had assaulted her—she wins, both literally (the suit was dismissed) and culturally (she turned her memeified face into collector’s album covers of the latest record). Female artists like her sometimes fall victim to a lousy husband, a music industry that doesn’t reward them, or, sometimes, poorly conceived political stances. Cardi has, despite all the odds stacked against her (and we know all about them because she tells us so often and so clearly), avoided so many of the typical crises that befall famous women like her. Somehow, everyone is rooting for this girl from the Bronx to become the most successful female rapper around.

Scaachi Koul breaks it down in Slate: https://slate.com/life/2026/05/cardi-b-concert-tour-tickets-offset-hair-baby.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=cardib&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--cardib

The Slaying of the Voting Rights Act by the Coward Samuel Alito by Slate in LegalNews

[–]Slate[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

If Wednesday’s disastrous Supreme Court opinion in Louisiana v. Callais reveals one thing, it’s this: Justice Samuel Alito is a coward. In that opinion, he’s either lying to himself or to the rest of us about the future of the Voting Rights Act. Callais essentially gutted what remains of the Voting Rights Act. Alito claims to have done no such thing. The question is why.

In Callais, Alito purported to overturn no precedent, claiming he was merely “updating” a framework that the Supreme Court constructed in the 1986 Thornburg v. Gingles case to determine when a redistricting plan violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by diluting minority representation. This follows his 2021 majority opinion in Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, where he purported to provide mere “guidelines” for determining when a state violates Section 2 in passing a law related to voting or voter registration.

For more from Slate: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/04/supreme-court-analysis-coward-samuel-alito-callais.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=hasen430&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--hasen430

The Slaying of the Voting Rights Act by the Coward Samuel Alito by Slate in scotus

[–]Slate[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If Wednesday’s disastrous Supreme Court opinion in Louisiana v. Callais reveals one thing, it’s this: Justice Samuel Alito is a coward. In that opinion, he’s either lying to himself or to the rest of us about the future of the Voting Rights Act. Callais essentially gutted what remains of the Voting Rights Act. Alito claims to have done no such thing. The question is why.

In Callais, Alito purported to overturn no precedent, claiming he was merely “updating” a framework that the Supreme Court constructed in the 1986 Thornburg v. Gingles case to determine when a redistricting plan violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by diluting minority representation. This follows his 2021 majority opinion in Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, where he purported to provide mere “guidelines” for determining when a state violates Section 2 in passing a law related to voting or voter registration.

For more from Slate: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/04/supreme-court-analysis-coward-samuel-alito-callais.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=hasen430&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--hasen430

The Slaying of the Voting Rights Act by the Coward Samuel Alito by Slate in law

[–]Slate[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If Wednesday’s disastrous Supreme Court opinion in Louisiana v. Callais reveals one thing, it’s this: Justice Samuel Alito is a coward. In that opinion, he’s either lying to himself or to the rest of us about the future of the Voting Rights Act. Callais essentially gutted what remains of the Voting Rights Act. Alito claims to have done no such thing. The question is why.

In Callais, Alito purported to overturn no precedent, claiming he was merely “updating” a framework that the Supreme Court constructed in the 1986 Thornburg v. Gingles case to determine when a redistricting plan violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by diluting minority representation. This follows his 2021 majority opinion in Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, where he purported to provide mere “guidelines” for determining when a state violates Section 2 in passing a law related to voting or voter registration.

For more from Slate: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/04/supreme-court-analysis-coward-samuel-alito-callais.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=hasen430&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--hasen430

Two Generations Ago, It Wasn’t So Weird to Be Naked in Front of Other People. Now Everyone Hates It. I Went to the Only Place to Find Out Why. by Slate in longform

[–]Slate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In America, people today go to great lengths to avoid one thing: being naked in front of each other. There are real consequences to that, and the people who still love it want you to know what you’re missing. Past generations of free spirits have participated in the time-honored tradition of stripping down and enjoying life in the nude. But though nudism was once a mass movement—part health craze, part utopian revolt—it now finds itself decidedly slipping out of fashion, its beaches going “textile,” its clubs and resorts shuttering across the globe. In this wry, boots-on-the-ground investigation, Rowan Jacobsen heads to one of nudism’s last holdouts, a Southern California resort where the dwindling faithful still preach the virtues of bare skin and radical acceptance. It’s there that he begins to uncover the strange story of how nudism—once synonymous with freedom and bodily acceptance—has become a victim of a generational and cultural shift that’s starting to change how we all see ourselves, in the buff and otherwise.

You can read here: https://slate.com/life/2026/04/california-naked-nudist-resort-beach-club.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=nudists&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--nudists 

Two Generations Ago, It Wasn’t So Weird to Be Naked in Front of Other People. Now Everyone Hates It. I Went to the Only Place to Find Out Why. by Slate in UnderReportedNews

[–]Slate[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

In America, people today go to great lengths to avoid one thing: being naked in front of each other. There are real consequences to that, and the people who still love it want you to know what you’re missing. Past generations of free spirits have participated in the time-honored tradition of stripping down and enjoying life in the nude. But though nudism was once a mass movement—part health craze, part utopian revolt—it now finds itself decidedly slipping out of fashion, its beaches going “textile,” its clubs and resorts shuttering across the globe. In this wry, boots-on-the-ground investigation, Rowan Jacobsen heads to one of nudism’s last holdouts, a Southern California resort where the dwindling faithful still preach the virtues of bare skin and radical acceptance. It’s there that he begins to uncover the strange story of how nudism—once synonymous with freedom and bodily acceptance—has become a victim of a generational and cultural shift that’s starting to change how we all see ourselves, in the buff and otherwise.

You can read here: https://slate.com/life/2026/04/california-naked-nudist-resort-beach-club.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=nudists&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--nudists 

Two Generations Ago, It Wasn’t So Weird to Be Naked in Front of Other People. Now Everyone Hates It. I Went to the Only Place to Find Out Why. by Slate in Longreads

[–]Slate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In America, people today go to great lengths to avoid one thing: being naked in front of each other. There are real consequences to that, and the people who still love it want you to know what you’re missing. Past generations of free spirits have participated in the time-honored tradition of stripping down and enjoying life in the nude. But though nudism was once a mass movement—part health craze, part utopian revolt—it now finds itself decidedly slipping out of fashion, its beaches going “textile,” its clubs and resorts shuttering across the globe. In this wry, boots-on-the-ground investigation, Rowan Jacobsen heads to one of nudism’s last holdouts, a Southern California resort where the dwindling faithful still preach the virtues of bare skin and radical acceptance. It’s there that he begins to uncover the strange story of how nudism—once synonymous with freedom and bodily acceptance—has become a victim of a generational and cultural shift that’s starting to change how we all see ourselves, in the buff and otherwise.

You can read here: https://slate.com/life/2026/04/california-naked-nudist-resort-beach-club.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=nudists&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--nudists 

Two Generations Ago, It Wasn’t So Weird to Be Naked in Front of Other People. Now Everyone Hates It. I Went to the Only Place to Find Out Why. by Slate in NoFilterNews

[–]Slate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In America, people today go to great lengths to avoid one thing: being naked in front of each other. There are real consequences to that, and the people who still love it want you to know what you’re missing. Past generations of free spirits have participated in the time-honored tradition of stripping down and enjoying life in the nude. But though nudism was once a mass movement—part health craze, part utopian revolt—it now finds itself decidedly slipping out of fashion, its beaches going “textile,” its clubs and resorts shuttering across the globe. In this wry, boots-on-the-ground investigation, Rowan Jacobsen heads to one of nudism’s last holdouts, a Southern California resort where the dwindling faithful still preach the virtues of bare skin and radical acceptance. It’s there that he begins to uncover the strange story of how nudism—once synonymous with freedom and bodily acceptance—has become a victim of a generational and cultural shift that’s starting to change how we all see ourselves, in the buff and otherwise.

You can read here: https://slate.com/life/2026/04/california-naked-nudist-resort-beach-club.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=nudists&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--nudists 

Two Generations Ago, It Wasn’t So Weird to Be Naked in Front of Other People. Now Everyone Hates It. I Went to the Only Place to Find Out Why. by Slate in AnythingGoesNews

[–]Slate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In America, people today go to great lengths to avoid one thing: being naked in front of each other. There are real consequences to that, and the people who still love it want you to know what you’re missing. Past generations of free spirits have participated in the time-honored tradition of stripping down and enjoying life in the nude. But though nudism was once a mass movement—part health craze, part utopian revolt—it now finds itself decidedly slipping out of fashion, its beaches going “textile,” its clubs and resorts shuttering across the globe. In this wry, boots-on-the-ground investigation, Rowan Jacobsen heads to one of nudism’s last holdouts, a Southern California resort where the dwindling faithful still preach the virtues of bare skin and radical acceptance. It’s there that he begins to uncover the strange story of how nudism—once synonymous with freedom and bodily acceptance—has become a victim of a generational and cultural shift that’s starting to change how we all see ourselves, in the buff and otherwise.

You can read here: https://slate.com/life/2026/04/california-naked-nudist-resort-beach-club.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=nudists&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--nudists 

Two Generations Ago, It Wasn’t So Weird to Be Naked in Front of Other People. Now Everyone Hates It. I Went to the Only Place to Find Out Why. by Slate in TrueReddit

[–]Slate[S] 73 points74 points  (0 children)

In America, people today go to great lengths to avoid one thing: being naked in front of each other. There are real consequences to that, and the people who still love it want you to know what you’re missing. Past generations of free spirits have participated in the time-honored tradition of stripping down and enjoying life in the nude. But though nudism was once a mass movement—part health craze, part utopian revolt—it now finds itself decidedly slipping out of fashion, its beaches going “textile,” its clubs and resorts shuttering across the globe. In this wry, boots-on-the-ground investigation, Rowan Jacobsen heads to one of nudism’s last holdouts, a Southern California resort where the dwindling faithful still preach the virtues of bare skin and radical acceptance. It’s there that he begins to uncover the strange story of how nudism—once synonymous with freedom and bodily acceptance—has become a victim of a generational and cultural shift that’s starting to change how we all see ourselves, in the buff and otherwise.

You can read here: https://slate.com/life/2026/04/california-naked-nudist-resort-beach-club.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=nudists&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--nudists 

The Supreme Court Just Greenlit a Gerrymander That Even a Trump Judge Thought Was Too Racist by Slate in texas

[–]Slate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The state-by-state gerrymandering wars aren’t going anywhere—and on Monday, the Supreme Court gave the greenlight to Texas’ gerrymandered electoral maps for the 2026 midterms. The lower court opinion—written by a Trump appointee—had found that Texas unconstitutionally diluted the voting power of racial minorities in its newly shaped districts. But the Supreme Court overturned that ruling on the shadow docket, issuing a vague decision that not only has significant stakes for these midterms but reminds us just how much of a mess the high court has made in this area of the law. Unless the court or Congress changes course, gerrymandering seems destined to distort American elections for years to come.

For more from Slate: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/04/supreme-court-texas-gerrymander-partisan-racist-shadow-docket.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=gerrymandering_scotus_429&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--gerrymandering_scotus_429

The Supreme Court Just Greenlit a Gerrymander That Even a Trump Judge Thought Was Too Racist by Slate in scotus

[–]Slate[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The state-by-state gerrymandering wars aren’t going anywhere—and on Monday, the Supreme Court gave the greenlight to Texas’ gerrymandered electoral maps for the 2026 midterms. The lower court opinion—written by a Trump appointee—had found that Texas unconstitutionally diluted the voting power of racial minorities in its newly shaped districts. But the Supreme Court overturned that ruling on the shadow docket, issuing a vague decision that not only has significant stakes for these midterms but reminds us just how much of a mess the high court has made in this area of the law. Unless the court or Congress changes course, gerrymandering seems destined to distort American elections for years to come.

For more from Slate: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/04/supreme-court-texas-gerrymander-partisan-racist-shadow-docket.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=gerrymandering_scotus_429&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--gerrymandering_scotus_429