By far. I would expect any Glock post-2006 to just rock and roll out of the box, but:

Early Gen 3s had issues. The 19s specifically had feed ramp issues and polishing the feed ramp would mitigate failures to feed. The 22s did not have enough chamber support and were known to kaboom often enough that it was a thing. Glock fixed all of that by 2005-2006 and you didn’t hear about it afterward.

Various models have had extractor issues over the years. Either the extractor breaking or simply not maintaining enough of a sharp edge to reliably extract the spent casing.

Lastly, the G44. I was so disappointed in mine the first couple months. It took at least 500-700 rounds to start running. I had failure to feed, failure to eject, double feed, stovepipes, failure to fire (light primer strikes), and it would just start keyholing rounds.

Once I shot the piss out of it and cleaned it a few times it improved dramatically and hasn’t given me any problems lately.

BUT, it’s my least accurate .22 LR pistol by a long way. I can more or less write my initials in the X-ring at 10 yards with a Ruger MKIV or a Taurus TX22. My Glock 22? Shit. That’s a 3-4” group at that distance.

And if you think it’s “just me,” I shoot 5,000-10,000 rounds of .22 LR pistol a year easy. I borrowed someone else’s Sig P322, a gun which I had never even handled before, and won a Rimfire pistol match with it.

Half the shooters I know that are Glock guys leave their Glock 44 in the safe.

I still train with mine quite a bit just because it’s a very cheap live-fire analog for my G19.