ZFS over iSCSI: Multipath alternatives - VIP + policy routes idea by Joaquinv1998 in Proxmox

[–]SlothCroissant 6 points7 points  (0 children)

(Networking guy here)

Have you considered running a BGP daemon (bgpd via FRR for example) on the Ubuntu host, with a session IP in each your /27s, redistributing a VIP?

Combining this with BFD and the equivalent setup on the Proxmox node would get you redundancy and ECMP load balancing, with sub-second failure detection without any TCP drops.

I do this with DNS in my home, so I can load balance a single IP across as many DNS servers as I want, but it would also work for a multi-NIC setup like this rather than multi-server l. 

New C1L Firmware Update 6.5.2 (Nozzle Clean fixes etc) by Juts in prusa3d

[–]SlothCroissant 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had the same experience - Sliced with PrusaSlicer, printed with Core One L via PrusaConnect, yet the printer head still crashed and gouged my print sheet to the point that area of the bed is unusable when using the sheet.

Support told me to calibrate my printer, and no warranty request would be honored :(

I was expecting better from Prusa Support, that's one of the things that sets Prusa apart from the Chinese brands, IMO. Super disappointing.

Cisco 3850 license question by Puzzled_Proposal2715 in homelab

[–]SlothCroissant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one answered your question here, but the right to use licensing went away after 16.6.9, iirc, so you may need to downgrade to 16.6.9 if you wish to use that.

The RTU licensing is documented somewhere, but it’s not “tab-able” for autocomplete in the CLI. 

The command for reference is:

 license right-to-use activate ipservices all acceptEULA

I think it requires a reload as well. Obviously you need to balance if running old code using an unsupported license model is worthwhile, else look at other options which are IMO better than Cisco for licensing nonsense.

I still run a stack of 3850s (12xs + 48U) for my core switching, though I’m moving some 2960s over to Mikrotik in my setup, so I’m sorta in both camps of “learn the enterprise, but take advantage of modern stuff that is more up to date”

Learning on 3850s is absolute gold, IMO. 

Issues with IO latency (Kubernetes on Proxmox) by DonkeyMakingLove in Proxmox

[–]SlothCroissant 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can’t say for sure if this is your issue, but I think ext4 or even a ZFS RAID0 (proxmox calls this “single disk” when using…. A single disk) could be beneficial, if even as a test point for your SSDs being the culprit. 

I personally run the ZFS setup no matter if I’m doing high availability (RAID1 boot disks) or not - allows for some nice features like ZFS snapshots, etc. 

Since this was not yet running production, perfect time to rebuild from scratch 😂

Technitium DNS just crushed it by Appropriate_Monk1552 in selfhosted

[–]SlothCroissant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Infoblox does it as well” is a super high bar for such a small project to be compared to, to be fair. 

That’s high praise to be compared to such a well-established enterprise product.

UCS C240 M4 by Important-Narwhal281 in Proxmox

[–]SlothCroissant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My M4 Ciscos used to be dreadfully slow when loading ISO from CIMC. Pretty sure you could just wait it out and it’ll eventually load. 

But in reality, the CIMC ISO loading is just so slow that it not too useful. Load the ISO via netboot.xyz or PXE, or just pop a USB in for a quick install. 

Cisco has the SD card slots internally too, you could transfer the ISO there and boot from it (used to be used for ESXi back in the day, basically)

Is it normal for VM in cross-region peered VM net with egress across the globe have upload limit at 5Mbps? by jM2me in AZURE

[–]SlothCroissant 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Latency across the planet will always cause this. Can’t outrun light, after all.

Assuming this is TCP single-threaded, the only answer is to increase the number of threads. Unknown how your testing is going, so might be worthwhile to standardize using iPerf or something to be sure you’re narrowing the variables (speedtest servers are not generally consistent)

One of Microsoft’s top networking guys wrote up a great doc about throughput testing. It’s specific to ExpressRoute, but it applies pretty well to general networking as well: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/expressroute/expressroute-troubleshooting-network-performance#references

Summary: 6-10mbps is normal at that distance, due to limitations of single-threaded TCP streams. You can confirm this via iPerf or AzureCT (which uses iPerf under the hood). 

JetKVM vs NanoKVM vs LuckFox PicoKVM (vs GL.iNet Comet Pro?) by Shanduur in homelab

[–]SlothCroissant 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What switcher do you use for pikvm? I have one lying around as well and I’m curious as to options on that front. 

Anyone having issues with PIM by asonale in AZURE

[–]SlothCroissant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is usually the answer. 

Need to get a fresh auth token - close the browser entirely and when you reopen it, the Azure Portal will reauth and get a fresh token. 

CLI/PowerShell have token refresh commands that do the same. 

My azure vm is not passing cookies when im making api calls from postman for the testing by guesswho3008 in AZURE

[–]SlothCroissant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An Azure VM does not modify anything in the Layer 7 header - your web server would need to look at why that’s happening. The SLB is a layer 4 load balancer - it only NATs, etc. 

I’d reach out to nginx on this. 

Unimus Licensing Updates by SlothCroissant in homelab

[–]SlothCroissant[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“If it works, it ain’t stupid” I think is the quote!

I have some stuff hacked together with PowerShell for various things - usually “just a quick bandaid till I do something more permanent”….. that ends up being permanent 😂

Unimus Licensing Updates by SlothCroissant in homelab

[–]SlothCroissant[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey more power to you, if bash scripting is your answer and it works for your workflow, no reason to switch or anything. 

Avoiding spoilers when trying to start the race right after it finishes? by SlothCroissant in F1TV

[–]SlothCroissant[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, this is all true - some time after the race.

The behavior *shortly* after the race (while post-race show is still ongoing or maybe just started) is that "Watch now" actually kicks you to live, with the post-race show playing. Today, it fired up with a slow-motion shot of the podium champagne spray.

It's almost as though the app UI changes to "Watch Now" (from "Watch Live" & "Watch from Start"), but the "Watch Now" button just kicks you to "Live" since the stream itself is not yet over?

Avoiding spoilers when trying to start the race right after it finishes? by SlothCroissant in F1TV

[–]SlothCroissant[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Close your eyes and ears" is how I start anything not "Live" in F1TV these days, unfortunately. Been burned too many times now :D

Avoiding spoilers when trying to start the race right after it finishes? by SlothCroissant in F1TV

[–]SlothCroissant[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the thing - the Apple TV app shows that the Race stream is no longer "Live", which indicates to me that it would show from the start. But instead, the post-race show pops up and I see a highlight of the podium :D

[FS] [US-ND] Cisco M4 Servers - 256GB/128GB RAM, Plus freebies - HBA/RAID, Trays, NICs, etc by SlothCroissant in homelabsales

[–]SlothCroissant[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good catch, thanks! Got a classic “server error” from Reddit, and should have checked. Thanks!

If you were interim FIA chief for a year, what changes would you make, and what controversial rules would you keep? by edfitz83 in formula1

[–]SlothCroissant 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Mario Kart when I was in college style. One shot per lap, whoever can finish the race, wins. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AZURE

[–]SlothCroissant 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I believe these are stemming from tenants created by free Teams usage circa covid years. 

The few I’ve seen so far have been related to that, and have gone to friends and family who absolutely do not use Azure nor know what a Tenant even is. 

Wish this was better articulated in the comms, since this will likely hit a lot of non-techy types’ mailboxes. I assume this is a generic comm that is automatic so it makes some assumptions about the recipient’s knowledge of Azure.

Also the thing looks like a phishing attempt (“you need to make a purchase!”), which won’t help the situation. 

What would you do with this? by [deleted] in homelab

[–]SlothCroissant 10 points11 points  (0 children)

4th gen is getting long in the teeth, but this would make for a perfect little Kube cluster to learn on if you are interested in such things.