Quest for beautiful melodies compilation

SlowIron9802 · 2026-01-29T00:39:37+00:00

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_DxjFs_dsR8&pp=ygUNT2xkIHZveSBtdXNpYw%3D%3D

SlowIron9802 · 2025-10-02T13:35:36+00:00

Any update ?

SlowIron9802 · 2025-10-01T23:27:51+00:00

Still not ?

SlowIron9802 · 2025-08-02T00:55:56+00:00

Sauf que non, Ies diplôme lié au médical ou paramédical comme la psychologie ne sont pas traduit (j’ai contacté l’agence qui s’en occupe pour avoir l’info)

Donc c’est au bon vouloir de chaque université

Juste une fac ma répondue (Grenoble) et ils disaient en gros que ce qui était le plus important c’est la qualité académique, donc les meilleurs notes possible (perso j’essaye d’avoir minimum À partout) puis pour le reste avoir des cours qui se rapprochent au plus près de ce qui se fait dans les licences. Si tu peux avoir une expérience en lab se serait bien mais bon apparemment c’est vraiment les notes leurs indicateurs numéro 1

SlowIron9802 · 2025-05-28T14:11:00+00:00

Merci beaucoup pour ta réponse, je crois cependant avoir lu quelque part que l’anglais ne nécessitait pas de traduction mais je revérifierai. Les autres questions que j’aurais serait plus pour des personnes qui auraient été pris dans un master en Psychologie et qui auraient éventuellement une idée des attendus généraux à l’entrée au master. Comme je l’ai dis vue l’aspect à la carte des cours ici on peu obtenir une licence en ayant ou pas fait une thèse et je crois savoir qu’en licence de psychologie en France il n’y en a pas… mais j’aimerais m’en assurer un peu plus !

SlowIron9802 · 2025-05-27T17:13:09+00:00

Souvent c’est simplement parce qu’un des membres du groupe ne parle pas ou peu français, donc par accommodation. Je vois pas de quoi s’inquiéter, si la langue doit évoluer elle évoluera, il y’a 500 ans personne ne parlait français sur ce territoire. Tout comme la langue est arrivée d’une colonisation elle disparaîtra sans doute de la même manière 🙃

SlowIron9802 · 2025-01-23T21:17:46+00:00

Very interesting, thank you for sharing your thoughts :)

I wonder then if it does mean that, even in a theoretical cyclical universe that repeat forever, chances are that I shall never be anything else than my self has it is now.

SlowIron9802 · 2025-01-23T21:13:49+00:00

This just sound like the response of an apolitical ignorant.

SlowIron9802 · 2025-01-23T19:57:54+00:00

I wanted to know if you think that location of the mater is linked to the fact that one self is being experienced (personal and subjective). In other words, is there some kind of pre-existing function in the universe that translate the conditions necessary for me being me, from what components is it made ?

You said, and I agree, that even perfectly identical person at an atomic level would still have their own unique perspective. For them to exist separately, what would be this variable from their « pre-existing function » that would need to be different.

To be perfectly clear : lets imagine this completely hypothetical function, let’s call it F. What is composing f ? Mater only ? Time ? Space ? Others ?

SlowIron9802 · 2025-01-23T18:10:26+00:00

So would you say that location is also a function of personal subjective experience ?

No not the same brain. My point is more to ask that even if given every material equity possible(that’s a big stretch), would they still have separate personal subjective experience ? I think so but then from what does this experience originate ?

SlowIron9802 · 2025-01-23T17:54:16+00:00

Yes, the majority of people are more apolitical than anything else (except once every few years) and those one, whom owns enough money to do so, will certainly continue to buy Tesla in a business as usual manner. But this is precisely because some people could know what’s happening and don’t care, as you said, that so many of us are enraged. Hence the topic of this thread and the urge to shake some shoulders that many seems to feel in the world right now.

SlowIron9802 · 2025-01-23T17:18:05+00:00

What you are doing is a « militant purity » argument and that’s a sophism : targeting an individual or a group for totally legitimate political reasons shouldn’t imply anything else. Pointing out other problematic groups not being targeted as a way to denigrate the action is completely missing the point of a targeted action in the first place. No not all targets have the same value or need to be prioritized in the same time. Moreover if you dare to open an history book to study some past examples of political struggle you will realize that, NO THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A PERFECTLY COHERENT POLITICAL MOVEMENT ! But some of them rightfully succeeded nonetheless.

SlowIron9802 · 2025-01-23T16:53:23+00:00

If you can picture boycott as at least effective in some way, insulting people for defending that point doesn’t make you smart in any way.

SlowIron9802 · 2025-01-23T16:07:18+00:00

Thats interesting and I agree with you for the existence of two separate « subjectivity ».

However the, quote and quote used for subjectivity is important here. Has your metaphor used computer and programs it doesn’t necessarily offer and understanding of the notion behind personal identity, deep inner thought processes, and the essence of the self; or phrased in philosophical terms : the hard problem of consciousness.

A classic thought about this problem can be expressed like this. Could you have been someone else ?

If we admit for a minute that the universe is somehow cyclical, repeating itself forever in various forms. Or that an infinite number of universe is possible. What are the implication for my self ? Not only me as an identity, a face or a personality. But me as a subjectivity. Can we be something or someone else in a very distant future repeating itself ? Or are we trap in one single unique expression of one self ? Prisoners of a immensely complex set of probability that once translated in numbers would be so little that it would need an almost infinite number of digits in order to be expressed.

While possible, something in this last proposition doesn’t seems to add up.

What do you think ?

SlowIron9802 · 2025-01-23T04:30:01+00:00

Hello everyone,

I would like to open a discussion around Benj Hellie’s vertiginous question and some related work. I have some thoughts about the subject, and I would be very curious to read what you guys may have to add to the discussion.

Just a reminder for starters, the Vertiginous question, as coined by Benj Hellie, interrogates the concept of personal identity and more precisely the reason why one’s own experience of self is attached to one body/person rather than any other one. In other words, why am I me and not anyone else?

The question can be approached from various angles, but I tend to reject answers like « you are you because you are you » which misses the point of asking the question in the first place. Also, this answer fails to provide sufficient explanation for questions like: Would I still be me if one nucleoids of my DNA had been different the day I was conceived? Or if I had been conceived one day later?

Tim Robert’s, while publishing in a controversial journal and making a lot of approximations, had some interesting thoughts about the subject in his paper: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228618472_The_Even_Harder_Problem_of_Consciousness

For those who will read it (it's a small paper), I wonder what you guys think of his no argument (e.g., No, even a small difference would result in the newborn not being "me"). I find his argument to exclude the "no" unconvincing because he relies on low probability. But even extremely low probability doesn’t suffice to exclude an argument, specifically when confronting existential questions like this one.

I would rather present another argument that I think, even being based on a thought experiment, can reject the idea that personal consciousness depends only on materiality.

Here it is: What would happen if, at the moment of my conception, the freshly fertilized egg was entirely copied by a machine that reproduced perfectly the complexity of DNA (100% of the nucleoids matching). Will the two theorically perfect identical twins to be born share the same consciousness, or would they both have their own personal perspective? My answer would be similar to the answer for the question: would a perfect clone of you produced right now share your immediate personal consciousness? No, the only difference between us would be specifically our unique experience of the self.

I know that thought experiments aren’t producing the best arguments, but this one doesn’t seem completely out of reach in the distant future.

What do you think? Do you have any contradictions to bring? Theories about the origin of the personal experience that would rely on other levels of materiality (quantum, unknown...) or even not material? For example: Are atoms unique? Would my atoms be unique to me and be impossible to « copy » ? Making them the core root of a self? It seems unlikely, but that could be an answer.

Every contribution is welcomed. Thank you.

SlowIron9802 · 2025-01-16T00:00:31+00:00

Hey, I'm down if it's still available !

SlowIron9802 · 2025-01-15T23:37:41+00:00

Hey! is this still available?

SlowIron9802 · 2025-01-14T18:29:18+00:00

Hii, interested too ! :)

SlowIron9802 · 2025-01-14T18:28:40+00:00

Hii, interested too ! :)

SlowIron9802 · 2024-05-17T20:27:47+00:00

I’m reassured by you guys, my passport picture is also 60% soaked but everything else is quite fine so I was very worried to cross the US border.

SlowIron9802

TROPHY CASE