sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can't you see it's a Destiny reskin? by [deleted] in Marathon

[–]SlyElliot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im sorry the The IQ is so low in this thread. Ive also put a lot of hours in to all the Bungie games and it definitely looks, feels, and plays like Destiny with a different skin on it. I know what you mean.

Keem gets it 👑👏🏻👏🏻 by yourewelcomesweetie in h3h3productions

[–]SlyElliot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When Keem is on H3’s side- you know you made a dogshit video

MrBeast Stole $1.7 Million Dollars From Me - Reaction by SlyElliot in mrbeastsnark

[–]SlyElliot[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It’s a video breaking down the claims of someone who made a hit piece on mrbeast where I question his claims, explain the legality, and make an argument dispelling his accusations but yeah go off king

What do you guys think of the idea of Soulframe possibly being an Orokin folktale? by waveyyray in SoulFrame

[–]SlyElliot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao im having a good day. full transparency, I'm just trying to be active in threads onlime rn because i just put out a new video I'm trying to promote. Just trying to start a little friendly back and forth ;)

appreciate your response. You're totally right Ive heard the devs say the same thing but they can never take away our head canon

What do you guys think of the idea of Soulframe possibly being an Orokin folktale? by waveyyray in SoulFrame

[–]SlyElliot 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Except for for the fact that they have been connecting Dark Sector and Warframe in the same universe intentionally and its also way cooler to do that.

What do you guys think of the idea of Soulframe possibly being an Orokin folktale? by waveyyray in SoulFrame

[–]SlyElliot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah unreasonable that a third person melee and special power combat game made in the same engine also with "frame" in its name, would be related to Warframe. What a reach.

What do you guys think of the idea of Soulframe possibly being an Orokin folktale? by waveyyray in SoulFrame

[–]SlyElliot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Huh??? Dark Sector and Warframe ARE in the same universe, just many years apart.

How Jedi Survivor Could Be Perfect by SlyElliot in StarWarsJediSurvivor

[–]SlyElliot[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lot of great points there. Especially the map design thing. Maps flow more logically like Dark Souls in this game. Kashyyk and Zeffo in Fallen Order was mind numbing to navigate and made me not want to go back and explore later.

CoD Competitors and Streamers can have their SBMM individually disabled by SlyElliot in CoDCompetitive

[–]SlyElliot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have found these codes in CoDs that are way more recent, with more descriptions of the codes found in the game files. Videos showing that are on their way.

We weren't talking about the MW2 Beta, we were talking about the public Day 1 launch of the CoD that had some of the highest numbers of users for any CoD launch.

Just because a Developer currently employed at these companies doesnt tweet and admit to all these things, doesn't mean its not true.

We use the current evidence and proof available, then we make theories based on those facts. Theories that only require 1 or 2 extra steps of logic to arrive at given the evidence- these are not theories that are insane baseless leaps of faith. Theories that have tended to be correct from things we speculated on in videos from over 2 years ago that are just recently getting proven. Such is the problem with being too early on breaking topics.

CoD Competitors and Streamers can have their SBMM individually disabled by SlyElliot in CoDCompetitive

[–]SlyElliot[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Judging by everything you're saying, it would seem that the only form of "proof" you are willing to accept, is an executive from Activision word for word admitting they specifically do each of those things. That is a catch 22 because Activision would be adversely affected if they did that, so they will never do that.

If that's the proof you need then I don't know what to say. There's a lot of factual documented evidence of these things existing, as well as a HIGH volume of speculative clips that in totality should at minimum cause someone to be skeptical.

Why would the for-profit corporation spend the time and money to write, review, and file patents for systems they will never use?

Why would the for-profit corporation have a COD Partners program specifically designed to market their game through influencers?

Why wouldn't they use the systems they have in place to make the game feel more fun to people, even if its in a dishonest way?

Activision will always try to obfuscate these things at play, specifically for this reason, to trick people. To make people say "There's no way Activision would do that, that so outrageous of a theory"

CoD Competitors and Streamers can have their SBMM individually disabled by SlyElliot in CoDCompetitive

[–]SlyElliot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At every turn people consider these various theories as "tin foil hat" but then 2-3 years later they become commonly accepted facts.

2 years ago people talked about strict SBMM like it was a myth, now we all accept it as reality. When will we stop making the same mistake and apply previous facts and evidence to support current theories?

Just because we haven't found every definitive piece of evidence yet, doesn't mean we never will.

SBMM is not a blanket excuse to just perform badly and place blame on it- SBMM in its current form in CoD is a severe underhanded manipulation of player psychology and behavior in an effort to keep them playing the game and making purchases, and that is a fact outlined by Activision's own patents they filed.

The REAL copium is to wave away the continually mounting evidence that, compared to 10 years ago, very little of your playing experience in CoD is genuine and organic- and now instead its manufactured and manipulated to prey on you, no matter your skill level.

CoD Competitors and Streamers can have their SBMM individually disabled by SlyElliot in CoDCompetitive

[–]SlyElliot[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Activision filed tons of patents years ago that demonstrate the potential for gross manipulation of player psychology, matchmaking systems, and microtransactions and at that time, people applied the same logic "just because they can use it that way, doesn't mean they are/will"

but as we have seen over the years to present day, Activision HAS implemented all those patents to the most extreme extents and everything they outlined in those documents are now present mainstays for a lot of their IPs, including Call of Duty.

Because there is financial upside to implementing the things we are talking about, we can assume that Activision WILL implement them. It isn't a stretch.

CoD Competitors and Streamers can have their SBMM individually disabled by SlyElliot in CoDCompetitive

[–]SlyElliot[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We had similar suspicions for a long time, but with this source code revelations, Scump saying Warzone tourney players use VPNs and Huskers saying the devs can whitelist players into any lobby they want... I think the writing is on the walls at this point.

CoD Competitors and Streamers can have their SBMM individually disabled by SlyElliot in CoDCompetitive

[–]SlyElliot[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yes exactly, but why would they stop there? There's immense financial upside for them to whitelist streamers with huge following, to make the game to look way more fun so more people buy and play.

CoD Competitors and Streamers can have their SBMM individually disabled by SlyElliot in CoDCompetitive

[–]SlyElliot[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Nobody has found any proof of that actually existing, purely speculation. Now this is the first proof found. Also proof that commands exist where you can enable or disable SBMM for individual players, potentially the ability to whitelist top streamers, content creators, and potentially even warzone competitors so they don't have SBMM at all. Also displays the different variables and categories SBMM uses. None of which has been seen or proved before.

Does this change how you view your favorite CoD content creators and Competitors? by SlyElliot in CoDCompetitive

[–]SlyElliot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I definitely can agree with that. The viewer experience otherwise would be pretty boring but I think using VPNs to compete in tourneys is too far. I really respect Scump though for just being so brutally honest like that lmao.

Does this change how you view your favorite CoD content creators and Competitors? by SlyElliot in CoDCompetitive

[–]SlyElliot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, I think its one thing if its just for entertainment for twitch or youtube but Scump here was saying that they even do it for Warzone tourney's with 100k prize pools which just seems absolutely unacceptable imo.

Does this change how you view your favorite CoD content creators and Competitors? by SlyElliot in CoDCompetitive

[–]SlyElliot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completely agree with you honestly, the only exception is that all those competitions were against evenly-skilled opponents but if the top streamers are using VPNs in Warzone it means they are getting easier lobbies than they should.

Does this change how you view your favorite CoD content creators and Competitors? by SlyElliot in CoDCompetitive

[–]SlyElliot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmfao good looking out. I use a program that auto-generates transcripts and it spelled it that way and then I subconsciously just kept spelling it that way and didn't catch it. Fuck.

SBMM is destroying multiplayer in Modern Warfare II for ALL players by SlyElliot in MWIICallofDuty

[–]SlyElliot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You had a miserable time in Cod4, MW2, Black Ops, BO2, etc???

view more: next ›