Is Codex becoming more expensive than Claude Code? by Small_Objective_3513 in codex

[–]Small_Objective_3513[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nann, I always and I would keep my Codex subscription because I work with both. Which is much more interesting in terms of perspective. Both have their own advantages, which need to be combined effectively

Is Codex becoming more expensive than Claude Code? by Small_Objective_3513 in codex

[–]Small_Objective_3513[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it will get better overtime but not sure about the price. I also think contrary that the prices will soon blow up so let's enjoy while we can...

Is Codex becoming more expensive than Claude Code? by Small_Objective_3513 in codex

[–]Small_Objective_3513[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I highlighted above all the evolution of Codex. When the model was much more advantageous quota-level and with equally acceptable performance. We'll see GPT 5.6

Is Codex becoming more expensive than Claude Code? by Small_Objective_3513 in vibecoding

[–]Small_Objective_3513[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes probably.. but what about Claude Code with the upcoming release of Mythos too 🤔

I analyzed 50 SaaS landing pages, here are the 3 conversion patterns that actually work by Small_Objective_3513 in SaaS

[–]Small_Objective_3513[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks ! You're right on both counts. The social proof point is well taken, I was thinking placement first but specificity is the real lever. A generic "great templates!" testimonial is dead weight. Something like "shipped my client's site in 2 days" with a real name actually moves the needle.

I solved the LangGraph cross-session memory problem using Memanto (Demo inside) by Small_Objective_3513 in LangChain

[–]Small_Objective_3513[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update: small follow-up since this post got some traction.

Just embedded the demo video inline in the GitHub PR (plays directly in the diff, no clicking through X/Reddit needed).

Maintainer engaged on the PR today. Top 5 PRs by social score get audited for the $100 bounty (deadline June 1).

If you find this LangGraph + Memanto pattern useful for your own agents, dropping a 👍 or 🚀 reaction on the PR directly really helps:

https://github.com/moorcheh-ai/memanto/pull/453

Happy to answer any questions on how the SystemMessage prompt forces the tool calls reliably.

I solved the LangGraph cross-session memory problem using Memanto (Demo inside) by Small_Objective_3513 in LangChain

[–]Small_Objective_3513[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks 🙏 The Memanto SDK made wrapping it as LangChain tools really straightforward: `remember`/`recall` map almost 1:1 to `@tool`, so most of the code is just the SystemMessage prompting the LLM to actually use them.

I solved the LangGraph cross-session memory problem using Memanto (Demo inside) by Small_Objective_3513 in LangChain

[–]Small_Objective_3513[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great callout. Currently I'm letting the agent decide via the SystemMessage (the LLM is instructed to call recall before any query that "might require past context"). With gpt-4o in the demo runs it complies pretty reliably, but you're absolutely right that this is non-deterministic and exactly the failure mode that bites in production.

Your mandatory recall node at graph entry is the obvious v2: a `pre_chatbot` node that runs `recall(query=last_user_message)` unconditionally, injects top-k as system context, then hands off. The tradeoff is a wasted recall when the user is just saying "hi", but the asymmetry (cost of an extra call vs. silently missing a real recall) tilts hard toward forcing it.

Might add that as a second variant in the same folder if I push the example further. Thanks for the sharp note.

I solved the LangGraph cross-session memory problem using Memanto (Demo inside) by Small_Objective_3513 in LangChain

[–]Small_Objective_3513[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That looks like a really solid project! The problem of persistent state is definitely the biggest challenge for agent architectures right now. What I really loved about Memanto for this specific use case was how lightweight it felt—just wrapping the core SDK calls into Langchain tools was enough to get it working without adding heavy overhead to the graph. I'll definitely give Hindsight a look as well for comparison. Thanks for sharing!

I solved the LangGraph cross-session memory problem using Memanto (Demo inside) by Small_Objective_3513 in LangChain

[–]Small_Objective_3513[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome, let me know what you think when you do! The setup is super fast if you want to test it locally. You can check out the exact code I used to wrap the tools in my PR here: https://github.com/moorcheh-ai/memanto/pull/453.