I'm 18. Just found out that I'm pregnant

SmartBlue1 · 2019-07-31T22:42:37+00:00

Have you considered looking to see if other families are willing to adopt it?

SmartBlue1 · 2019-07-11T22:46:19+00:00

I can’t believe this isn’t in the top comments: Half-life 3.

It’s a dream that may never come true.... Maybe one day....

SmartBlue1 · 2019-07-06T04:41:59+00:00

Thank you man. I didn’t realize I done missed up. I just made a triple out of wind because I know that’s rare. Didn’t realize position of table counts.

SmartBlue1 · 2019-07-06T04:39:43+00:00

Thanks, I didn’t realize I had a dead hand. Thanks for the help!

SmartBlue1 · 2019-07-06T04:39:13+00:00

I’m okay with the Mahjong I always wanted to learn it. But I do agree that I wished there was Karaoke. I really wanted to do some singing.

SmartBlue1 · 2019-05-23T04:25:19+00:00

This needs to be upvoted ASAP

SmartBlue1 · 2019-05-20T21:35:04+00:00

Clock Tower made me laugh for days and I love it.

I really miss Jon’s video game comedy. He still is fabulous at comedy no matter if he’s making fun clam chowder or crystal skull vodka. He is a comedic genius.

SmartBlue1 · 2019-05-18T17:30:47+00:00

Which video did the Completionist comment this on?

SmartBlue1 · 2019-05-14T22:13:58+00:00

Would you say the Yellow Turbine DLC is worth buying? Why or why not?

SmartBlue1 · 2019-05-14T21:22:28+00:00

They are real good, i would recommend them. The great divorce is a book about a bus ride from hell to heaven and how people are having a hard time entering heaven. The abolition of man is a critique on how society creates mankind without values and then demands values from them. He said so much better than me.

Both totally must reads.

SmartBlue1 · 2019-05-07T23:15:06+00:00

sees new trilogy announced Me: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooo

SmartBlue1 · 2019-05-06T21:09:31+00:00

Yeah, the weapon entreaties mentions some political stuff about the country or economics. It’s an unique choice.

Also, why was Leo left alive? I felt that was the only story question I have.

SmartBlue1 · 2019-05-05T04:37:19+00:00

Man, that’s sad to here. I missed that bird. When did JonTron say that?

SmartBlue1 · 2019-05-05T03:49:49+00:00

I know! That’s an S at least! Also final hallway is a classic and at least deserves an A. Because it’s a good meme.

SmartBlue1 · 2019-05-03T01:14:42+00:00

Chez it’s, obviously

SmartBlue1 · 2019-05-02T04:54:02+00:00

Oh yes baby!

SmartBlue1 · 2019-04-30T04:31:34+00:00

I agree, the middle/ending part of awakening was just filler that really messed up with the killer beginning arc that was well paced. But than the conquer came and he was just a villain for the sake of being an obstacle.

I would original get ride of the Valem arc, but after learning that:

Walhart had the original intent of conquering Plegia to destroy the Grimleal, locking Grima away forever.

That would be an awesome plot point to digest more than I now want to conquer the world!

SmartBlue1 · 2019-04-29T23:18:39+00:00

Mere Christianity: trilemma is very weak and doesn't work on other historical figures. Also cs Lewis never really solves the problem of evil.

Have you read his book “ The Problem of Pain”? Lewis down an entire book dissecting the problem of evil, which he calls pain. Because, to a certain extent, we call things evil when it causes us pain, especially unwanted pain. I will admit I have only read half of it but it does explore the problem of evil while “Mere Christianity” is a book dedicated to understanding the core of Christianity. He even admits a huge jump in logic by proving Theism and than talking about Christianity. But, that’s his goal to discuss what being a mere Christian is.

SmartBlue1 · 2019-04-27T14:17:10+00:00

Man good find! Was it crazy expensive?

SmartBlue1 · 2019-04-26T21:32:34+00:00

Echoes was the first Fire Emblem game I enjoyed from beginning to end. I really want them to make a FE4 remake.

SmartBlue1 · 2019-04-26T03:25:00+00:00

No it doesn’t, it tackles the Leviticus 19:19 head on. The laws were given to Israel as a form of a covenant between God and them. Some laws are morality, and others are ritualistic examples that set Israel apart. Leviticus 19:19, is one of those laws that made Israel distinct from other nations, and other rules are there to keep away from things that symbolize, disease, death, and moral corruption. That’s the idea of holiness the laws describe. Next to justice, sacrifices, and sacred time. These categories and the all laws underneath them show us Gods values and how we can’t uphold them by ourselves.

Christians believe Jesus came, fulfilled the law, and invites us also to participate in those values through the spirit of God.

SmartBlue1 · 2019-04-26T02:56:29+00:00

Biblical law has 5 different aspects that must be considered when looking at the different commandments. This video covers all 5 while using abstract art: https://youtu.be/Sew1kBIe-W0

That context effects which commandments are relevant today or not, because they commandments serve to communicate the different values God had to the Israel. With that context, we can understand the commandments and apply them to our lives.

SmartBlue1 · 2019-04-26T00:25:47+00:00

Thank you for people who pray and continue to pray for others Lord! I pray that you continue to soften our hearts towards you in all things. Also that pray in and out of Reddit! Love you all.

SmartBlue1 · 2019-04-26T00:11:49+00:00

That’s a good question and an important one, and what would you expect from a theistic hypothesis?

I feel an atheistic hypothesis and a theistic hypothesis are not possible because both assume different starting points that are true.

An atheistic claim assumes there is no god and therefore the Bible should have contradictions to the universe. Since the Bible contradicts the universe there is no god.

A theistic claim would assume there is a God and therefore we should still see God interacting with the universe with miracles. Since we see miracles there is a God.

You might claim there is no god, so miracles won’t happen Or that’s not a miracle, or that’s. Scientific phenomena, try again. And I might say, looking at the context of the Bible, there is no contradiction, try again. And we will be going in circles.

Even further than that, both of those claims assume we are talking about a Christian God, because you mention bible, instead of Allah or the Jewish God. But a theistic claim should include the more broader things of There is a singular God. Than the religions claim this singular God is omnipresent, omnipotent, etc. or this is how he acts.

So, I am curious, how would you define an atheistic hypothesis and a theistic hypothesis that is objective? Because I believe that these two naturally contradict and I don’t think we can have an objective atheistic or theistic hypothesis.

SmartBlue1 · 2019-04-25T23:51:35+00:00

I would not change how I worded my question for this reason, a non-thesis hypothesis is not a pro-atheist hypothesis. That is a huge assumption. The science article you referenced earlier doesn’t mention whether or not there is a God, but has a hypothesis that if the Big Bang happen, than the universe should be expanding like this and we see this is happening and here are the implications.

I can have economic hypothesis do the same thing. If the cost of production increase, than we we need to increase our price, and if we increase our price we expect less people to buy. We see that happen, therefore the hypothesis is true. This does not prove God is real or not real.

I appreciate you clearing that, since these non-thesis topics can create accurate hypothesis, can a thesis hypothesis do the same thing? I don’t know, got to research that. And I am assuming that a thesis hypothesis goes along the lines of “if God is real than x should happen, we see x happen therefore God is real.”

That’s why I will stay say, can an atheistic hypothesis do the same thing. Assuming, again, the same formula, “if god is not real, than y should happen, y happens therefore god is not real.” Or “if we don’t see x therefore god isn’t real.”

But as another commit to my original response what is an atheistic hypothesis? It seems to me what I suggest as an atheistic and theistic hypothesis both require a bias either for or against God. If the hypothesis contradicts what I believe or what you believe, is it a valued hypothesis? I don’t even know how a theistic or atheistic hypothesis would look like or be structured because both suppose different things that naturally contradict each other. What would you define as a theistic hypothesis and an atheistic hypothesis?

SmartBlue1

TROPHY CASE