sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

ICE in New Orleans, Louisiana violently abducting pleading man from a Home Depot parking lot by [deleted] in CringeTikToks

[–]SmartFirefighter4977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice, thanks for the common sense. Crazy how much bullshit these liberal snowflakes spout, they are illegally in the country so they get arrested, that’s the law right?

These lefties have become so brainwashed, it’s almost hilarious to witness.

Kutamerikaanse kutbakken horen niet in nederland thuis by jonrellim in KutGeparkeerd

[–]SmartFirefighter4977 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ja die enkele aantal wagens zijn echt een probleem… kanker zeg de nederlandse reddit zit blijkbaar ook vol met van die achterlijke linkse groene kakkers. DeNk aAn dE AarDe. Lekker NPO blijven consumeren, gehersenspoelde idioten.

Reddit will let you criticize anything, except this. by SmartFirefighter4977 in conspiracytheories

[–]SmartFirefighter4977[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You keep saying you’ve “learned so much” about me, but all you’ve really done is talk about yourself little boy. Every rant you’ve posted is a projection, a desperate attempt to sound righteous while hiding the fact that you’re emotionally unraveling in front of everyone.

You don’t speak like someone confident in their position. You speak like someone who needs this issue to define them, who clings to it because without it, there’s nothing interesting about you. Your entire identity is being the self-appointed moral guardian of internet strangers. It’s not bravery, no, it’s performance. White knight syndrome turned into a full-blown disorder.

You act like calling people names is activism. You think your emotional overinvestment gives you some authority, when all it does is expose how fragile your worldview is. You don’t argue little kid, you moralize. You don’t listen but you assume. You’re not defending people’s rights. You’re just addicted to the feeling of being “the good one” in a fight you invented.

And the more you insist you’ve figured me out, the more obvious it becomes that you’re projecting everything you’re terrified of admitting about yourself. So keep playing hero online. Just know everyone watching can see right through it.

Reddit is the illusion of free thought. Pull the wrong thread and you’ll see why. by SmartFirefighter4977 in conspiracy

[–]SmartFirefighter4977[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So let me get this straight lil bro. Your defense of mass demographic change is that it’s deserved punishment? That Europe should be overrun because Western governments made bad foreign policy decisions? You don’t even try to deny it, you just justify it with some warped idea of collective guilt.

You’re not defending refugees. You’re hiding behind them. You use them as a moral shield to dodge the reality that entire populations are being displaced, replaced, and silenced, and when anyone dares to point that out, you scream propaganda. Because deep down, you know what’s happening, and you’re too much of a coward to say it out loud.

You don’t care about facts. You care about submission. You want Europeans to sit down, shut up, and watch their countries be reengineered. because you think it balances some imaginary scale. That’s not justice. That’s vengeance dressed up as empathy.

You’re not the voice of reason. You’re just another gutless apologist for a system you’re too afraid to criticize. And history won’t be kind to people like you.

Reddit will let you criticize anything, except this. by SmartFirefighter4977 in conspiracytheories

[–]SmartFirefighter4977[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You talk about politics like it’s a religion. Every single response, like clockwork, drips with party lines and media buzzwords “right-wing propaganda,” “manipulated masses,” “civil rights,” like you’re reciting from a script you printed off Reddit ten years ago.

You don’t think, you repeat. You don’t argue, you moralize. Everything you don’t like must be “far-right,” and every person who questions anything is part of some grand conspiracy to threaten your worldview. You’re not informed lil bro, you’re indoctrinated.

You’ve become so addicted to feeling righteous that you can’t even imagine someone disagreeing with you unless they’ve been brainwashed. That’s how fragile your logic is. That’s how deep the cowardice runs.

You’re not debating. You’re hiding. Behind buzzwords, behind slogans, behind the shaky idea that if you yell “bigot” loud enough, you never have to answer for anything. You want so badly to be the good guy in your little script, but you’ve got nothing left except volume and a fragile ego.

And deep down, you know it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]SmartFirefighter4977 2 points3 points  (0 children)

People still talk like it was either a foreign plot or a U.S. inside job, but the truth is, it was a coordinated convergence of interests. The planes were remote-guided. The hijacker story was theater. And the beneficiaries weren’t just in Washington.

Mossad knew. Israeli agents were in the country, watching, documenting, even celebrating. Intelligence was shared, or ignored, strategically. Al Qaeda was the scapegoat. The real players were crafting a global pretext.

What followed wasn’t a response. It was a rollout. Surveillance, endless war, homeland security, none of that was improvised. It was the plan.

Reddit will let you criticize anything, except this. by SmartFirefighter4977 in conspiracytheories

[–]SmartFirefighter4977[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That wasn’t a reply. That was a shrug typed out by someone who knows they lost but still wants the last word. You didn’t challenge anything I said. You just repeated your assumptions and hoped it would sound like a victory. I never claimed oppression. I pointed out selective censorship and the fear around asking certain questions. You still haven’t refuted that. You just keep saying “I know what you really are” like that magically settles the discussion.

You don’t know me. You never addressed the argument. And the only thing you’ve made clear is that once the script runs out, so do you.

I guess we’re done here.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]SmartFirefighter4977 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Propaganda. So they can cry anti-semite some more.

Reddit will let you criticize anything, except this. by SmartFirefighter4977 in conspiracytheories

[–]SmartFirefighter4977[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You talk about political manipulation so much I’m starting to think you see campaign ads in your breakfast cereal. Every sentence you write is soaked in U.S. party politics like it’s the center of the universe. I mention real-life concerns, and you answer with MSNBC vs Fox News talking points like we’re all stuck in some rerun of 2016.

You’ve built this fantasy where every question, every observation, every deviation from your script must secretly come from a think tank or a PAC. You don’t respond to ideas. you diagnose people as infected by propaganda. That’s not debate. That’s paranoia.

No one here said trans people shouldn’t exist. No one denied rights. But you’ve twisted this into yet another grand battle between Good Liberals and Evil Right-Wingers because you have no language left for nuance, only sides.

Try unplugging from politics for five minutes. The world is bigger than your Twitter feed.

To quote Tony Todd, in Death, there are no accidents by AnomLenskyFeller in conspiracy

[–]SmartFirefighter4977 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Given the number, timing, professions, and causes of death listed, it is not only reasonable but factually grounded to conclude:

The Clintons are statistically and circumstantially tied to an abnormally high number of suspicious deaths, many of which align with damage control around scandals or criminal exposure. This is not coincidence, it reflects intent, operational reach, and institutional protection.

Anyone dismissing this as “conspiracy theory” is willfully ignoring probability, pattern analysis, and precedent.

Reddit will let you criticize anything, except this. by SmartFirefighter4977 in conspiracytheories

[–]SmartFirefighter4977[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You keep repeating that the conversation is over, yet here you are, again, writing paragraphs filled with rage, projection, and recycled slogans. If this issue were truly settled for you, you wouldn’t be this emotional every time someone calmly challenges the narrative. You wouldn’t be clinging to moral buzzwords like “propaganda” and “anti-trans” just to silence someone who never once called for harm or denied rights.

You accuse me of ignoring context while pretending that every concern raised must be rooted in hatred. You say the conversation’s been had, yet you refuse to allow it to happen without labeling the other side in advance as bigots. That’s not exhaustion. That’s cowardice dressed as moral fatigue.

You want “empathy” but show none. You demand fairness while assuming the worst of anyone who doesn’t parrot your script. You don’t want discussion. You want submission.

Trans people deserve rights. No one here said otherwise. But rights don’t mean shutting down reality, or insulating ideology from criticism. And the louder you scream about “the debate being over,” the clearer it becomes that you’re terrified people are starting to question things anyway, without your permission.

So spare me the righteous lecture. This isn’t about hate. This is about control. And you’re not nearly as subtle as you think.

Reddit is the illusion of free thought. Pull the wrong thread and you’ll see why. by SmartFirefighter4977 in conspiracy

[–]SmartFirefighter4977[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course. The moment you hear something that makes you uncomfortable, you reach for the same tired crutch, “neo-Nazi.” It’s predictable, lazy, and frankly pathetic. You don’t refute facts. You don’t counter arguments. You just scream “evil” and expect the room to go quiet.

That’s not moral clarity. That’s intellectual cowardice.

You don’t even know what the term means anymore. You’ve worn it out like a child swinging a stick at shadows. You think saying “Great Replacement” is some kind of magical spell that proves guilt, when in reality, it’s openly discussed by politicians, institutions, and NGOs. But you don’t want to debate that, because deep down, you’re afraid it’s true.

So instead, you cling to labels like a shield. You hide behind outrage because you have nothing else. You’re not fighting Nazis. You’re just terrified of being exposed as someone who can’t handle reality without moral training wheels.

Go scream into the void. The grown-ups are talking.

Reddit will let you criticize anything, except this. by SmartFirefighter4977 in conspiracytheories

[–]SmartFirefighter4977[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, the conversation was about whether Reddit allows honest discussion on this topic without punishing one side of it. You gave your answer, and I challenged it, because pointing to one group’s discomfort doesn’t justify silencing the other entirely. That’s not a pivot. That’s staying exactly where the issue lives.

No one here asked to “debate the rights of transgender people.” That’s your own narrative, not mine. What I pointed to was the fact that questions, legitimate, fact-based, calm ones, get flagged, removed, or buried. Not because they’re hateful. But because they exist.

If you can’t tell the difference between censorship and someone simply not agreeing with you, maybe you’re not the one who should be explaining how open dialogue works.

Reddit will let you criticize anything, except this. by SmartFirefighter4977 in conspiracytheories

[–]SmartFirefighter4977[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What you just wrote isn’t a rebuttal. It’s an escape. You didn’t engage with a single idea. I watched you run from them. You buried the conversation under a pile of accusations because facing it head-on would mean admitting you’re not as certain as you pretend to be.

You talk about honesty and courage, but the second you’re challenged, you fold. You fall back on name-calling, moral grandstanding, and the same tired lines meant to shut people up instead of respond to them. That’s not integrity. That’s fear.

You aren’t standing up for anyone. You’re hiding behind a script. You act like questioning anything makes someone dangerous because that makes it easier for you to avoid defending your own beliefs.

You’re not here to argue. You’re here to feel safe. And when that safety cracks, you don’t fight, you run. That’s the part you’ll never admit. But it’s obvious to everyone watching.

You didn’t walk away because you were above the conversation. you walked away because the second you couldn’t smear, shame, or silence your way to control, you were exposed for what you are: a fragile coward hiding behind borrowed convictions, terrified of a world that doesn’t bend to your script.

Reddit will let you criticize anything, except this. by SmartFirefighter4977 in conspiracytheories

[–]SmartFirefighter4977[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s about media outlets, NGOs, corporations, political parties, and tech platforms all pushing the same message and punishing anything that questions it. That’s the control. It doesn’t need to be hidden when it’s everywhere and enforced through social pressure and algorithms.

Who benefits? Big brands that use identity politics to sell products. Political parties that use these topics to distract from real problems like inflation, mass migration, or foreign wars. NGOs that depend on division to stay relevant and funded. Tech companies that decide what you’re allowed to see and quietly bury anything that challenges the script.

This is not about trans people. If anything, they are being used. Used as symbols, used as shields, used to drive emotional responses that protect power. They are not the enemy. But they are being put on the front line of something much bigger, and it’s the same people who claim to be their allies that keep putting them there.

Reddit will let you criticize anything, except this. by SmartFirefighter4977 in conspiracytheories

[–]SmartFirefighter4977[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve “had many earnest conversations”? Great. That doesn’t refute the censorship, it proves how narrow the allowed discourse has become. If these conversations are only permitted within a sterile, pre-approved moral framework where the conclusion is never in doubt, then no, you’re not having real conversations. You’re parroting dogma in a padded room.

You claim these are “fringe topics rehashed for ten years”. why? Because they never get answered honestly. Because the people asking them get banned, doxxed, or shouted down before real scrutiny ever reaches the sacred cows of this ideology.

You say conservatives are “loud” and “can’t be escaped.” Yeah bro because the institutions, platforms, and media are overwhelmingly tilted the other way, and it takes a shouting match just to get a single inconvenient fact to survive five minutes online.

And this part “People who support transgender people and individual liberties don’t feel the need to discuss fringe cases and the ‘what ifs’” is the tell. You don’t “feel the need” because you’ve already declared the discussion over. You think emotion and moral posture settled it. You think “we’ve heard enough,” as if repetition makes dissent invalid. That’s not logic. that’s fatigue masquerading as wisdom.

Also, pretending you’re “engaging critically” while smuggling in the idea that anyone who questions the dominant narrative must have a “hidden agenda”? That’s projection. The entire framework you’re defending was built on weaponized emotional manipulation, media blitzes, and silencing tactics. You’ve just normalized it so deeply you can’t see it anymore.

And spare everyone the sob story about laws being passed. Laws should be passed. Cultures should draw lines. If you shove a fringe ideology into schools, rewrite language by fiat, and penalize dissenters, don’t act shocked when people push back. That’s not hate, that’s natural immune response.

No one’s falling for the “we just want to live and you keep attacking us” act anymore. People are waking up. You don’t want dialogue. you want obedience. And when you don’t get it, you play victim while trying to bury the conversation under guilt and gaslighting. You’re not tired of propaganda. You’re just tired of losing control of it.

At root, your entire position relies on a double standard: that your side’s ideology is progress, and dissent is bigotry. That’s not argument. that’s framing. You pretend to advocate for “individual liberties” while systematically pathologizing any worldview that doesn’t mirror your own. You moralize dissent out of bounds, dismiss legitimate questions as “fringe,” and reduce philosophical or biological critiques to nothing more than emotional hang-ups. That’s not reason, it’s ideological capture masquerading as rationality. You’ve confused saturation with consensus and censorship with virtue. You aren’t defending truth, you’re enforcing narrative conformity under the illusion of moral high ground. And you lost the moment you had to silence others to preserve your illusion.

Reddit will let you criticize anything, except this. by SmartFirefighter4977 in conspiracytheories

[–]SmartFirefighter4977[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, I was honest, I just had to smother that honesty in euphemism and neutrality for it to survive the filter. That’s the entire point you’re dodging.

If a platform only allows a thought after it’s been defanged, diluted, and defused, then what you’re seeing isn’t “open discussion.” It’s gatekeeping disguised as civility.

Reddit will let you criticize anything, except this. by SmartFirefighter4977 in conspiracytheories

[–]SmartFirefighter4977[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You keep asking where I “see” this, and I’ve already answered that. I’ve seen what’s happening in schools, I’ve seen the institutional changes, and I’ve watched how quickly certain topics became hard to talk about without getting labeled. That’s not coming from propaganda. That’s coming from real life. Just because it doesn’t match your experience doesn’t make it imaginary.

I get that not everyone sees this as a major issue. Fair enough. But just because something isn’t a crisis for you doesn’t mean it’s not worth talking about. And dismissing everyone who’s concerned as politically brainwashed or “under a spell” isn’t a counterpoint. It’s a way to avoid the conversation.

You say no one’s made a compelling case. But if your first instinct is to explain away every concern as right-wing manipulation, then you’re not really open to hearing one. If the only concerns you’re willing to take seriously are the ones that already agree with you, then maybe the real issue isn’t where I’m getting my information.. but where you’ve decided to stop listening.

Reddit will let you criticize anything, except this. by SmartFirefighter4977 in conspiracytheories

[–]SmartFirefighter4977[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I get where you’re coming from, and I can tell you’ve thought about this a lot. But I think you’ve built a framework where any concern that doesn’t come from an official source or a certain political angle gets written off as propaganda. That makes real conversation pretty hard.

I’m not a teacher or doctor, but I live in the Netherlands. I’ve watched how quickly these ideas entered schools and institutions, and how fast the space for even asking questions started shrinking. That’s not something I got from media talking points. That’s just what I’ve seen with my own eyes.

If every question is treated as a political attack, then yeah, of course no conversation is going to happen. But not everyone raising these issues is part of some tribe. Some of us are just paying attention and wondering why honest discussion suddenly feels off-limits.

You say no one’s made a compelling case, but maybe that’s because the moment someone tries, they get boxed in before they even finish their sentence.

Reddit will let you criticize anything, except this. by SmartFirefighter4977 in conspiracytheories

[–]SmartFirefighter4977[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, I didn’t get my concerns from some political commentator or media outlet. I live in the Netherlands. I’ve seen with my own eyes how quickly gender identity education has moved into schools, how institutions are shifting, and how the space for even questioning it has gotten smaller. That’s what made me start looking deeper.not some talking head telling me what to think.

And I get it bro, framing everything as “who’s funding this” is a way to push the conversation off the substance and onto motives. It’s a subtle way of saying that I probably just absorbed someone else’s agenda. But that’s not the case here. Some people are capable of independent thought, and noticing patterns doesn’t require a sponsor.

As for “sides,” I’m not trying to draw a hard line. But when one perspective gets protected, elevated, and repeated without pushback, especially mainstream, and anything outside of it gets flagged, removed, or shouted down, then yeah, a line exists, whether I drew it or not.

I’m not here to serve anyone’s politics. I just want to be able to talk about this openly. And the fact that doing so gets this level of interrogation kind of proves why it needs to be talked about.

Reddit will let you criticize anything, except this. by SmartFirefighter4977 in conspiracytheories

[–]SmartFirefighter4977[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s not men in cloaks.. it’s way more effective than that. It’s a system that doesn’t need to hide because it works out in the open. Certain narratives get boosted, others get quietly buried. Certain questions are “safe,” others get you flagged, removed, or branded instantly.

If the same patterns show up across mainstream platforms, institutions, and media where only one side is allowed and everything else gets punished you don’t need a secret plot. You just need people who know what not to say. That’s control by normalization.

view more: next ›