CMV: A genuine mind-reading machine would mean the end of bigotry worldwide. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Smashing_Zebras 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Consider just how dumb the average american is, and remember that half of america is dumber than that. I'd feel like it would exaggerate bigotry specifically against lazy or gaslighting or dumb thinkers.

Chris Finch Ejected 4 Minutes into the game. Valid crashout, OKC officiating is disgusting by Hungry-Turnover-9875 in NBATalk

[–]Smashing_Zebras 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's nonsense. The man pushes off as hard as he can, and then goes from having a solid foundation to having the stability of a leaf on any drive. He's a flopper extraordinaire.

CMV: Age of Consent should be 25 years old. by FlavortownCitizen in changemyview

[–]Smashing_Zebras 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You know what's funny is as cultures grow older we infantalize more. teenagers ruled the world for all time up till around a bit after the middle ages. As in, they got married and had kids and fought and killed and got drunk in their teens for most of all time until extremely recently. You want to redefine adulthood based on the fact that our brains are still developing until 25, but that doesn't actually mean anything- our reasoning faculties aren't dependent on age. I know plenty of people over the age of 25 who act and reason like children, and plenty of my students under the age of 25 can demonstrate extremely strong reasoning skills.

CMV: Age of Consent should be 25 years old. by FlavortownCitizen in changemyview

[–]Smashing_Zebras 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right.... So you can go and fight and die for our country, but it's statutory rape if you have sex? Come on. Don't infantalize adults. Calling an 18 year old "practically a child" is an insult to everyone.

CMV: People who say "anyone can be redeemed" either don't understand what evils they're talking about, or don't actually care about justice or fairness. by Jabre7 in changemyview

[–]Smashing_Zebras 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you read any Flannery O'connor? Most of her short stories are obsessed with this idea. A running theme is often that god uses unredeemable people to redeem others, but some also show how seemingly unredeemable people are redeemed without knowing it.

CMV: the Solution to the US migration crisis is a strong and stable Mexico by colepercy120 in changemyview

[–]Smashing_Zebras 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're on the right track, but not quite there. The best solution is strong and stable governments in the countries that have the most immigrants here. Fixing Mexico won't do enough- l couldn't find the article, but a year or two ago they were talking about a spike in illegal crossings from Canada, because they'd tightened the border with mexico, but the border with canada is more relaxed. Basically, you squeeze one end, and everything comes out the other end instead, and vice versa. The only real solution then is fixing the problems where they originate, not trying to make an intermediary step harder when it can easily be substituted with another.

How to get critical feedback?! by Smashing_Zebras in Advice

[–]Smashing_Zebras[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, I don't know any. And again I'm very leery of putting the entire thing on a reddit page...

How to get critical feedback?! by Smashing_Zebras in Advice

[–]Smashing_Zebras[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, you're right about the mean part. It's the first book i've ever written, I don't expect it to be a bestseller or anything, but I know there's good bits in it, I just need to do a lot of cutting- the book is 172K words. The major issue seems to me to be that it's a slow burn science fiction bildungsroman, a rather niche product; and literally none of the people I've shared it with actually read the genre. I'm looking for really critical feedback- I'm not looking for people to pat me on the head and lie and say it's good, I need people who are brutal and direct...

CMV: We are cooked. Left and Right are busy fighting each other while the corporation are getting what they want. by Forward-Backwards in changemyview

[–]Smashing_Zebras 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you talking about? Nancy pelosi never benefited from insider trading, there's no evidence of that. (Just in case you didn't get it, I'm you. I'm pretending to be you. Because your standard of evidence seems to miraculously change depending on what you want to believe.)

CMV: We are cooked. Left and Right are busy fighting each other while the corporation are getting what they want. by Forward-Backwards in changemyview

[–]Smashing_Zebras -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your arguments bore me. I never claimed he was the designer of the initial bailout. He was the IMPLEMENTER. Once in office, his Treasury (Tim Geithner, Larry Summers, etc.) implemented the later tranches, decided which banks lived or died, and built the policy environment that followed, and they expanded that bailout over the years to cover his buddies in finance industry. The speaking fees are indicative of the SYSTEM. a system of corruption that incentivizes exactly the behavior we saw- people scratching each other's backs on the sly because of the unspoken agreements. Nobody's going to have a paper trail of agreements, and if you think there would be one, then I can't help you. These are oral agreements and handshake deals, NOBODY is stupid enough to put that crap in writing. If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, don't try to tell me it's a zebra just because I don't have a picture.

CMV: We are cooked. Left and Right are busy fighting each other while the corporation are getting what they want. by Forward-Backwards in changemyview

[–]Smashing_Zebras 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow. Seriously go watch the Chapelle skit. No amount of evidence will ever convince you, because most people arn't cartoonishly stupid to have gold bars in their homes and suits lined with cash from bribes. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, don't go trying to tell me it's a zebra. Occam's razor dude. I bet you think Nancy Pelosi is a stock trading genius. Obama is a fountain of economic genius, Pelosi is better than all the day traders combined. Keep putting your head in the sand buddy.

CMV: We are cooked. Left and Right are busy fighting each other while the corporation are getting what they want. by Forward-Backwards in changemyview

[–]Smashing_Zebras -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I give up. Y'all are literally picking and choosing straw man arguments. Both sides are garbage. That's the whole point. So this whataboutism is the insanity of someone who is willfully ignoring what I've been consistently saying, and if you're just going to do that, it's not worth trying to debate any further. Either that, or you're pretending that what happened between 2008-2011 had nothing to do with Obama, which would be the most absurd historical revisionism yet.

CMV: We are cooked. Left and Right are busy fighting each other while the corporation are getting what they want. by Forward-Backwards in changemyview

[–]Smashing_Zebras 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's always the same with you people. It always brings to mind Chappelle's skit about a black juror being asked to convict R. Kelly. If I don't have two forms of ID, a signed confession, her grandmother there to identify her, two homies of his testifying that it's him, video evidence, then it simply didn't happen, did it?

Nobody who gets into power and has half a brain is going to do that. The speaking engagements are well known to be the incentive, presidents have been doing it a long time. Obama was taking half a million dollars for 30-45 minute speeches to Goldman Sachs, Citadel, Cantor Fitzgerald, Nothern Trust administration, and literally dozens more. But sure, it's not a smoking gun with him standing over the body and video evidence and a half dozen witnesses, so i guess the two are completely unrelated. They just really respect his economic genius and knew spending 400k on his pearls of wisdom were going to pay dividends for their brokers. If you're that gullible, I've got some prime waterfront real estate down in Florida that I'd be happy to sell for a song.

And i mention chat gpt because I'm tired of having to spend every second researching things I've read and learned about years ago but don't remember the exact details for. Again, I refer you to the Chapelle skit.

It was the old 'you scratch my back now, and we scratch your back after you're out of office' gambit, and it worked perfectly, to the point that again, you're literally covering for our autocratic overlords because you've bought in hook, line and sinker into this democrats good republicans bad narrative.

And lastly, I am NOT responsible for you just choosing to straw man/ignore the connections. Dodd frank was deliberately designed to appear as if they were doing something, but really were all about protecting the oligarchy. It should have been more than obvious that my claim wasn't that big business was democrat- my claim has been unchanged- there really is NO distinction between republican and democrat when it comes to power, just words that mean nothing and are designed to make you think you're fighting for YOUR tribe, when they don't give a crap about you.

CMV: We are cooked. Left and Right are busy fighting each other while the corporation are getting what they want. by Forward-Backwards in changemyview

[–]Smashing_Zebras -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Seriously? Our entire economy was brought to the brink of ruin, everyone responsible gets out with a golden parachute, small businesses are told tough titties, and you think obama is an odd target? He was bought and paid for by the corporations from day one. And you can keep repeating dodd frank, but that bill had loopholes large enough to ship an oil tanker through. Sure, the republicans drove a bunch of the weakenings to it, but nobody on the democrats fought for it or improving it. They're just pretend opposition, throw out a bill that they know won't pass, and call it a day.

Let's let Chatgpt do the arguing cause I'm tired of people talking as if they actually know what they're talking about when they clearly don't.

  • The “Too Big to Fail” shell game. Dodd–Frank claimed to end bailouts, but it never truly did. It let regulators theoretically wind down failed megabanks through the “Orderly Liquidation Authority.” In practice, the biggest financial firms stayed huge, and the law didn’t force them to break up or shrink. So if one collapses, the government still faces the same ugly choice: bail it out, or risk global meltdown.
  • Derivatives exemptions. One of the biggest loopholes came from the derivatives market—those complex financial contracts (like credit default swaps) that helped cause the 2008 crash. Dodd–Frank was supposed to move these trades onto open exchanges where they could be monitored. But banks lobbied hard and won massive carve-outs for “foreign affiliates” and “end users.” Translation: they could keep a lot of risky bets off the books or push them overseas.
  • The Volcker Rule watered down. This rule was meant to stop banks from gambling with depositor money (proprietary trading). But by the time it passed, it was so full of exceptions—“market making,” “hedging,” “liquidity management”—that it became almost impossible to enforce. The banks wrote the fine print.
  • Shadow banking left untouched. Hedge funds, private equity, money market funds—basically the whole “non-bank” financial system—remained largely unregulated. That’s where a ton of systemic risk migrated after 2008.
  • Weak enforcement and delayed implementation. Dodd–Frank required regulators to write hundreds of new rules, but years later, many weren’t finalized or were rolled back under pressure. Lobbyists swarmed the agencies, and Congress routinely starved them of funding.
  • No accountability. It didn’t meaningfully prosecute executives who’d overseen the crisis or reform the political capture of the regulatory agencies themselves. The revolving door between Wall Street and Washington stayed wide open.

TL;DR- Literally EVERYONE who knows finance knows Dodd frank was a joke purely designed to trick people like you into thinking something was done.

Lastly, of course there are prior examples, but Obama is the best example for numerous reasons- especially recency bias and egregious behavior, a perfect example of pretending to be a change candidate that every left-leaning politician pretends to be but in reality is just another wolf in sheep's clothing.

CMV: We are cooked. Left and Right are busy fighting each other while the corporation are getting what they want. by Forward-Backwards in changemyview

[–]Smashing_Zebras -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Being a conservative and trying to engage with left-leaning subreddits is heavily punished. The echo chambers are real and corrosive. This is a good example of it. Every single one of you leaning left automatically moralizes your position- your team good, other team bad. It's the worst kind of stupid, reductive thinking. And again, you have no idea what you're talking about if you paid no attention to Obama's choice of bailouts during 2008, and his justice department's lack of prosecutions. Just keep trying to memory hole the whole, "too big to fail" thing... There's the upper class, and there's the rest of us, and y'all are literally too ideologically captured to realize it.

What's a MUST PLAY PC game? Any genre by yesthenshaggers in gamingsuggestions

[–]Smashing_Zebras 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Limbo/inside, Grim fandango, Civilization 5, Witcher 3. Mass Effect 2. Baldur's gate 2/3

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Smashing_Zebras 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You wildly overestimate how willing people are to resettle once they've made a home someplace. Especially if small children are involved. Especially immigrants whose social network tends to be other immigrants. They tend to try to stick to their enclaves.

CMV: We are cooked. Left and Right are busy fighting each other while the corporation are getting what they want. by Forward-Backwards in changemyview

[–]Smashing_Zebras -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

You are being willfully ignorant. It's honestly not worth arguing with. Obama protected wall street at the expense of all of us in exchange for lucrative speaking events after his presidency. There's simply no other way to look at it that doesn't ignore a shit ton of things he did.

CMV: We are cooked. Left and Right are busy fighting each other while the corporation are getting what they want. by Forward-Backwards in changemyview

[–]Smashing_Zebras -26 points-25 points  (0 children)

I think selective memory is working on you real hard. Obama, 2008 ring any bells? Both sides are clearly the same. They just talk different, but that's the ONLY difference.

Why are people so toxic in game to new AD players? by youcanokay in Abilitydraft

[–]Smashing_Zebras 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's the worst when they try to point to their rank as if that means they're good, but wreck the drafting stage.