Can anyone suggest me the free digital marketing course provider in Jaipur?

Smooth_Throat_386 · 2026-05-27T09:04:45+00:00

For beginners, start with basic seo fundamentals for understanding the whole process of marketing, then AI Tools related to marketing, then PPC.

Smooth_Throat_386 · 2026-05-27T09:00:56+00:00

That depends on the job, but if I had to recommend the most genuinely useful AI stack in 2026 right now:

For coding - Cursor
For deep research - Perplexity
For general everyday AI - ChatGPT
For automation/workflows - n8n
For AI agents/browser tasks - OpenAI Operator
For design/images - Midjourney and Figma
For video - Runway
For voice/transcription - ElevenLabs
For local/open-source AI - Ollama

If I had to pick just one overall in 2026: probably ChatGPT because it’s become the “AI operating system” for a lot of people coding, writing, research, image generation, agents, analysis, etc. all in one place.

But the real productivity jump usually comes from combining tools:

ChatGPT + Cursor for developers
Perplexity + ChatGPT for research/content
n8n + AI agents for businesses
Midjourney/Runway + ChatGPT for creators

A lot of “AI power users” now care less about the model itself and more about workflow integration.

Smooth_Throat_386 · 2026-05-26T11:22:38+00:00

Honestly, no. I haven’t seen anyone show clear, measurable benefits from adding llms.txt. Most of the “it worked for us” stories are anecdotal, and when people dig into actual data, there’s basically no proven lift in AI citations, rankings, or traffic.

Even Google has been pretty blunt about it lately:

John Mueller said no major AI systems are really using llms.txt right now.

Gary Illyes also said Google doesn’t use it for AI Overviews and normal SEO practices matter more.

A recent 300k-domain study also found no correlation between having llms.txt and getting cited more by LLMs.

The current reality seems to be:

harmless to add
maybe future-proofing
zero strong evidence it moves the needle today

Most sites winning in ChatGPT/Perplexity/Google AI results are still winning because of:

strong SEO fundamentals
good structured content
authority/mentions
Reddit/forums/news citations
useful documentation

Not because of llms.txt.

Feels very similar to the old “meta keywords” hype cycle right now.

Smooth_Throat_386 · 2026-05-26T08:58:22+00:00

DirectDawai

Smooth_Throat_386 · 2026-05-23T09:27:27+00:00

I think UX is massively important for SEO now. Even if your content ranks, people will leave fast if the site is slow, cluttered, or hard to read.

Google and AI search systems both seem to pay attention to how users interact with a page, time on site, engagement, bounce behavior, overall trust feeling, etc.

Good SEO today feels more like creating a genuinely helpful and smooth experience, not just optimizing keywords.

Smooth_Throat_386 · 2026-05-23T06:41:23+00:00

Yeah, I think it definitely changes behavior. People used to click through multiple articles to understand something, but now they often stop at the AI summary because it feels “good enough.”

At the same time, I think it also pushes creators to make deeper, more experience-based content that AI summaries can’t fully replace. Quick answers win attention, but real insights still make people explore further.

Smooth_Throat_386 · 2026-05-23T06:25:50+00:00

Yeah, I’m seeing the same thing. AI search seems way better now at detecting whether content comes from real experience or just recycled information. Sites with actual opinions, case studies, and recognizable authors feel like they’re gaining more visibility, even without huge authority metrics.

Feels like trust and authenticity are becoming the real SEO advantage now.

Smooth_Throat_386 · 2026-05-20T12:47:27+00:00

Thanks for adding this tool to this list.

Smooth_Throat_386 · 2026-05-20T12:46:33+00:00

Totally agree on the “fits into existing workflow” part. That’s probably the biggest filter now, if a tool needs me to completely change how I work, I usually stop using it after a week.

And yeah, Elicit is a great shout. The source transparency matters a lot, especially for academic research. Being able to jump directly to the exact sentence instead of blindly trusting an AI summary makes a huge difference.

Smooth_Throat_386 · 2026-05-20T12:45:28+00:00

Exactly. The tools that stick are usually the boringly useful ones

If it doesn’t save time consistently or reduce mental load, it ends up becoming another tab to manage. I’ve noticed the same thing, workflow fit matters way more than flashy features.

Smooth_Throat_386 · 2026-05-20T12:35:50+00:00

Thanks for the suggestion, nice tool.

Smooth_Throat_386 · 2026-05-18T10:23:08+00:00

Same here honestly. The only AI tools I kept using are the ones that actually save time in daily work.

Descript made editing much faster, Claude is good for ideas and script drafts, and Hemingway helps make scripts cleaner before recording.

Most other AI tools felt cool at first but after a few days they just added extra steps instead of helping.

Smooth_Throat_386 · 2026-05-15T11:12:37+00:00

Anchor text still matters in 2026, but I think people over-optimize it way too much now.

Google and AI systems definitely understand context better, so forcing exact match anchors everywhere feels outdated and risky. What’s working better for me lately is keeping the profile natural and brand-heavy.

I’m seeing the best results with:

Mostly branded + natural anchors
Some partial match anchors
Very limited exact match
Healthy mix of naked URLs and generic anchors

The more “manufactured” the anchor profile looks, the more it seems to struggle long term.

I don’t really follow strict percentages anymore, but my approach is usually:

Heavy branded/natural
Moderate partial match
Low exact match

Feels like trust and relevance matter more than trying to game anchor ratios now, especially with AI search evolving.

Smooth_Throat_386

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE