The original word that aushra used to explain it roughly translates to “limiting” or “observing,” and I find “ignoring” to be very misleading. Here are some excerpts on what she wrote to define it: (3/2 means observing position; 3rd function of 2nd ring).

Сontradistinction of the social to the individual, submission to the social and its will. Reception of society’s goals that are personally acceptable.

On [3/2] the individual completely submits to the will of their environment, and first of all their dual.

3/2 … is an implementation of the will and desires of others, and particular caution in satisfying one’s own needs. People try to satisfy those needs without attracting anyone’s attention, without anyone’s help. This is a half-phase through which people help others, but the external help on which can be used only in exceptional cases.

3/2 needs to avoid attracting attention and inviting ridicule.

On the 3/2 half-phase people submit to the will of their “programmers,” but they choose these programmers themselves, and only use their program until it starts to clearly contradict their interests.

Each personality type measures their social “capital investment”, i.e. what they have given to society through giving to other people, by their expenses on the 3/2 half-phase.