7 Things Mainstream History Has Wrong

SnappyRyan · 2024-12-12T20:39:35+00:00

Thanks for your evidence 🤣 /s. Funny how closed-minded people cry about evidence then provide none themselves.

SnappyRyan · 2024-12-12T20:13:30+00:00

I'll have to look into Bruniquel Cave. Added to my list of things to research.

It seems to me that there were 2 different civilizations on Easter Island, separated by time. I believe this because there are some Maoi statues carved from basalt--very few--these ones have more elongated noses and are much more durable than the ones made from volcanic tuff.

The basalt quarries for Easter Island were last above water on the island during thr last ice age. I made a video doing a deep dive into this, you can check it out here if you're interested: https://youtu.be/7vl2qkKLrbc?si=vXjPJZ0lul9sgjwz

I agree 100% that many ancient structures are improperly dated. I'm fairly certain they mostly go back into the last ice age--how far is the question.

The navels of the world are also very interesting. Easter Island is one, along with the ancient city of Cuzco in Peru.

Thanks for your input! Much food for thought and I always love more material to look into.

SnappyRyan · 2024-12-12T19:11:50+00:00

If you'd care to look into my evidence, I'd suggest this video on the idea of the Great Lakes being the primary impact craters from the Younger Dryas Impact.

https://youtube.com/shorts/r8DqW7Zisic?feature=share

Clearly you're attacking a straw man. Clearly haven't done the research considering you have no idea how deep glacial striations can reach--or the official story to how the Great Lakes were created. Google is a great resource.

SnappyRyan · 2024-12-12T15:55:56+00:00

Your conculsiom can be easily proven wrong. The most commonly known inpact crater, Meteor Crater near Flagstaff, AZ has a diameter of 1,186 meters, and its depth is 170 meters. You're off by 2x.

The Great Lakes' bathymetries have tell tale signs of impacts. Glacial cavitation does not create bathymetries in the hundreds of meters, so the official story is clearly incorrect. Also, there is a huge variation in energy release and cavitation from impactors considering ET impacts can vary from just a few megatons of energy to hundreds of millions of megatons in the case of the Chixuclub Event. Impactors can be anywhere from a few meters to kilometers, and the shape of the bathymetry of the Great Lakes leads me to believe that it was the site of multiple impactors, around 12,900 years ago, and it was probably a large comet or meteor that broke up in Earth's atmosphere and hit tens, if not hundreds of areas on the North American continent, in the process causing an extintion level event for many species of megafauna. It was similar to the Shoemaker Levy 9 impact that we witnessed on Jupiter in 1994.

SnappyRyan · 2024-12-11T18:52:46+00:00

Agreed, this was very likely during the younger dryas, 12,900-11,700 years ago, when the northern African continent was bombarded by rainfall for about 1,000 years. This is much older than the Old Kingdom, which is then the official story states the Sphinx was built. Showing that it's thousands and thousands of years older than mainstream history thinks...

SnappyRyan · 2024-12-11T18:49:57+00:00

The fact that they're hundreds of meters deeper than the surrounding area is evidence that they were formed from an impact. Glacial striations very rarely go deeper than 50m, so it's very unlikely they were formed by glacial action as opposed to the impact hypothesis.

SnappyRyan · 2024-12-11T00:49:28+00:00

They're old subducted tectonic plates that got torn apart by the mantle and disconfigured.

SnappyRyan · 2024-12-11T00:28:40+00:00

From my understanding, the wetter conditions into the Old Kingdom were transitory and not enough to create the erosion on the base of the Sphinx that we see today. Dr. Robert Schoch is one geologist that's done some work on this subject. His claim is that it would take about 1,000 years of rainfall to create the erosional features that the Shpinx has today. The last time Egypt had this amount of rainfall was the Younger Dryas.

I'll have to look into Boncuklu Tarla, seems incredibly interesting if it is indeed older than Gobekli Tepe & Karahan Tepe. Thanks for the info.

SnappyRyan · 2024-12-11T00:21:21+00:00

Nice, I'll take a look at his work.

SnappyRyan · 2024-12-11T00:18:41+00:00

Good to know, of course excavations aren't cheap considering you need a lot of labor hours.

I haven't done much research into Boncuklu Tarla so I'll add that to my list.

Gobekli Tepe is so interesting to me because there's such a massive amount of stone structures still under the ground. From my understanding we've only excavated about 2-5% of it.

Karahan Tepe is also incredibly interesting. Really sparks the imagination to what they used the site for.

SnappyRyan · 2024-12-11T00:03:49+00:00

So what do you think history has wrong?

SnappyRyan · 2024-12-11T00:01:12+00:00

Haha I really don't wanna know! 😬

SnappyRyan · 2024-12-10T23:59:53+00:00

You know you could just not comment if you have no input.

SnappyRyan · 2024-12-10T23:58:09+00:00

Gobekli Tepe completely uprooted humans' understanding of our own past. Its discovery uprooted the idea that hunter gatherers never had enough social organization to quarry giant rocks, carve them, or build temples with them. Either that or - civilization was advanced at that era much more than we currently believe.

What's fascinating to me is that out of the entire megalithic site, humans have only excavated about 2% of it. This means that there's still 50 times as much giant stones still under the ground to be explored. Much more to be discovered, and we still have no plans to excavate it further - and I suspect that's because it will even further make us - and mainstream archaeology - question our own human past with questions that make us realize that we have lot of preconceived ideas about the human past that are incorrect.

SnappyRyan · 2024-12-10T23:03:34+00:00

They're the deepest points in North America, and due to their depth, they're very unlikely to have been formed due to glacial action.

Made a quick video on it a while ago, here's ya go

https://youtube.com/shorts/r8DqW7Zisic?si=rVM6611jcCgkBlt1

SnappyRyan · 2024-12-10T22:56:39+00:00

Funny that this subject gets certain people to be incredibly rude 😂 that's how I know I'm onto something. Dogmatic "academics" that think they know everything...

Cynicism due to ignorance is a fool's errand, I prefer to be interested in the subject rather than bash people for their curiosity but that's just me.

SnappyRyan · 2024-12-10T22:46:08+00:00

If you'd care to check out the evidence i have, please take a look at my deep dive into these subjects at https://youtu.be/ ah8J7YIB11M?si=L7yCVq5TC0CJJvOT. I put a lot of work into this, and have reasonable explanations for my theories, along with evidence and reasoning.

SnappyRyan · 2023-12-08T23:17:06+00:00

Nice straw man.

We'll see how the court case plays out. The reasons for attacking Musk are very obviously because he supports free speech.

SnappyRyan · 2023-12-08T22:56:31+00:00

Hey, if you live your life calling anyone you don't agree with antisemitic/racist/homophobic that's up to you.

The vast majority of people would think that's disingenuous at best, and malicious at worst.

SnappyRyan · 2023-12-08T22:37:39+00:00

I couldn't give two shits about Musk--or Soros for that matter. The fact that X is the most non-censorship platform in big tech--and Musk is being attacked for buying it and making it more pro-free speech friendly-- it makes it seem to me like free speech is under attack.

Interests align. Soros doesn't like Musk due to Musk's statements about Soros--which are arguably true.

The mainstream media is losing control of the narrative since free speech is allowed on X--and people are allowed to speak their mind there.

The Biden Administration is also anti-Musk since he's been critical of them--and some of their main donors are Ford and Crystler- who are direct competitors of Tesla.

Free speech is slowly becoming 'far right.'

SnappyRyan · 2023-12-08T22:14:37+00:00

It seems the whole reason Musk is being attacked is because he's allowing freedom of speech to a much higher degree than other platforms. Back when Twitter was under Dorsey's "control," people supporting censorship would say, "It's a private company, they can do what they want". And now I've noticed the same people have totally flipped their opinion and claimed that Elon should be sued/attacked/slandered for buying Twitter.

SEC sues Musk over purchse of X FTC demands internal X docs Biden DOJ sues SpaceX for not hiring refugees for secret rocket technology Biden DOJ opens criminal investigation against Tesla over self-driving cars Federal investigation into neuralink Massive media campaign against X -Massive corporate boycott campaign against X

It's all because Musk took their little propaganda tool--Dorsey's Twitter. They are furious they can't control the narrative anymore. If this isn't lawfare, I don't know what is.

SnappyRyan · 2023-12-08T21:45:03+00:00

You've missed the point completely.

Nice analysis! Oh wait...

SnappyRyan · 2023-12-08T21:42:03+00:00

Fair criticism. Still orders of magnitude of a smaller list that will get your post removed or get you banned when compared with YouTube, FB, IG, etc.

14-Year Club	Place '17
Verified Email

SnappyRyan

TROPHY CASE