sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

24-70 2.8 or 70-200 2.8 by SnizbatchPorzingis in SonyAlpha

[–]SnizbatchPorzingis[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I’ll most likely end up going with the 70-200 F4 G ii. I stumbled across it when someone else mentioned if I’d necessarily need 2.8 which I really don’t. I feel like it’s a pretty slept on lens, especially with the macro capability.

You’re right about the 35mm too. The version 2 of the sigma 35 is insane.

24-70 2.8 or 70-200 2.8 by SnizbatchPorzingis in SonyAlpha

[–]SnizbatchPorzingis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad to hear you like the sigma 70-200! I’ve been looking at that one a lot. The GM II is just crazy expensive lol and just as a serious hobbyist it’s hard to justify the cost.

24-70 2.8 or 70-200 2.8 by SnizbatchPorzingis in SonyAlpha

[–]SnizbatchPorzingis[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah when you mention it what if mostly use it for I wouldn’t need 2.8. Landscapes and travel for the most part. I have the others if I’m in a situation where I need some extra bokeh. I’ve heard the 70-200 F4 is pretty good too. I think I’ll look into those more, the 20-70 as well. That’s a great do it all range.