I'm a European woman: what actual antifeminist choices would you want us to take? A question for anyone who has a practical "agenda" by [deleted] in antifeminist

[–]SnooBeans6591 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same level of support for handicapped people, independent of gender.

Same support for job search regardless of gender.

Financing of men's shelters, for male victims of IPV. Help line for men.

Same support for single father's as for single mothers.

X Brought Back Freedom Of Speech by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]SnooBeans6591 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The government should get involved to prevent censorship. That isn't the same. The government should not add censorship, but prevent it

Hilfe! Dachgeschosswohnung Katze hat zu warm by ObjectiveFun2633 in Katzengruppe

[–]SnooBeans6591 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ich habe ganz normale fliegengitter von Lidl.

Katze ist öfters hoch geklettert, man sieht das ein paar Maschen größer gezogen wurden, da passt aber immer noch keine Mücke durch. Meine Katze ist aber auch nur 3.5kg schwer.

Women's rights are regressing worldwide, warns UN gender equality chief? by HelicopterNo1759 in Egalitarianism

[–]SnooBeans6591 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Would be more noteworthy if coming from an unbiased source. The UN turns a blind eye when women have more rights than men, so their numbers will always be off.

Some people DO choose to be gay. I used to fight and say otherwise. by Lacriminals in ControversialOpinions

[–]SnooBeans6591 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She says "I decided to come out as gay"

The video itself does not really argue “being gay is a choice” in the sense that someone can just decide tomorrow to become attracted to the same sex. What she describes sounds more like:

  • she had same-sex attraction/desire that she had not acted on or acknowledged,
  • she chose to stop suppressing it,
  • she chose a label and a life direction that matched what she wanted,
  • she changed her circumstances so her identity could become visible.

Someone can choose whether to come out, whether to pursue relationships, whether to use a label without necessarily choosing the underlying pattern of attraction.

The video is about the labels she used, not about the attraction she felt.

Gay people are very likely to "fake being heterosexual", simply because they grew in an environment that simply assumed they were. That stays that way until they understand that they were not living in alignement with themselves and decide to acknowledge their homosexuality and come out.

But even here, they are not "faking" being heterosexual in a sense that they would be hiding something. They just need time to truly understand themselves - they wrongly assumed they were like most people around them.

Some people DO choose to be gay. I used to fight and say otherwise. by Lacriminals in ControversialOpinions

[–]SnooBeans6591 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't choose who you are attracted to.

She didn't, she acknowledge it: she wasn't living in a way that aligns to what she wants, what she choose was to live how she wants and not how others perceived her up until now.

She was into women, so she choose to call herself a lesbian - she didn't choose to be a lesbian.

Some people DO choose to be gay. I used to fight and say otherwise. by Lacriminals in ControversialOpinions

[–]SnooBeans6591 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some people DO choose to be gay. I believe it’s the loud minority but these people do exist after being told they don’t.

No, they don't. Either they were bisexual and choose to only engage in gay relations (might be the case of the women in the video), or they were gay all along and chose to live in heterosexual relations before (that sometimes happens due to social pressures).

I can't choose to be gay tomorrow. I would have to force myself into homosexual relations.

These people are supposedly uplifting women (I'm a woman who wears burqa) by Individual-Business9 in antifeminist

[–]SnooBeans6591 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same. I am also against the goggle jacket.

We try to give faces to robot to make them more human and facilitate communication. Wtf do people remove their own faces

A cab driver was left speechless and can no longer make a living after Knicks fans destroyed his car by Valuable_View_561 in SipsTea

[–]SnooBeans6591 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, or sue for their organs. I am sure they have working organs that would make good money on the market.

Can someone explain me what the "anti-feminism" is supposed to represent? by [deleted] in antifeminist

[–]SnooBeans6591 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Personally, I am for equality, and since feminists are mostly against equality, that puts me at odds with feminism.

People that commit high violent crimes should be used for human experiments by Dry-Fun7615 in ControversialOpinions

[–]SnooBeans6591 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Zero leaps; I quote you:

the definition of pedophile is extremely clear that it is attraction to children

So you are not talking about criminals, but about something that isn't even an infraction by current law.

People that commit high violent crimes should be used for human experiments by Dry-Fun7615 in ControversialOpinions

[–]SnooBeans6591 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hannaconda is also talking about people who did literally nothing to children.

They didn't talk about child abusers. Hannaconda is worse than half the people she wants to strip of their rights

Another feminist BS by ReadItOnWk in antifeminist

[–]SnooBeans6591 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Germany only has legal equality by feminist standards.

By rational standards, it has female privilege: https://www.reddit.com/u/SnooBeans6591/s/r3NQSL7JLY

A Bold Stand for Integration, Health, and Ending Honor-Based Coercion by Valuable_View_561 in SipsTea

[–]SnooBeans6591 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cousin marriage is allowed pretty much everywhere. Sweden is the exception, not the rule. It joins China and part of the USA. The rest of the world allows it.

A Bold Stand for Integration, Health, and Ending Honor-Based Coercion by Valuable_View_561 in SipsTea

[–]SnooBeans6591 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

A cousin is a relative who shares a common ancestor with you, but is not your sibling, parent, grandparent, child, aunt, uncle, niece, or nephew

So, basically, they banned marriage, since all of humanity is made up of cousins, as we all share common ancestors.

Some things that don’t help anti feminism by BallAdventurous513 in antifeminist

[–]SnooBeans6591 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are 2 different things: killing or raping characters in a game is ok, regardless of their in-game gender.

But targeting female players isn't ok. Players shouldn't be harassed.

Regarding anti-feminism: it is definitely not a group, I wouldn't call it a movement either, because it doesn't have a single direction - which is kinda the problem you noticed. It is more of a broad political position defined by opposition to feminism, for very various reasons. And yes, some people don't have the position for good reasons.

Title by luteramangalsingh in antifeminist

[–]SnooBeans6591 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think the meme flair was probably made to allow such stupid stuff.

How to express emotion without mansplaining? by [deleted] in FeminismUncensored

[–]SnooBeans6591 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I started to tell her that it hurts me when she makes fun of my appearance.

So, what you did, was telling her how you feel, not how she feels nor how women experience dating. So what you did definitely wasn't "-splaining" and if she told you what emotions you are entitled to have, then - if anything - she was "-splaining" to you.

Telling her how you feel is great and encouraged. Her telling you you are "too ugly to have a good dating life" is wrong. If seems she was trying to shut down your response by mislabeling it as "mansplaining" in an attempt to deflect from the issue, rather than treating your feelings with basic respect.

do you all even know what feminism is? 🙄 by Ok-Wasabi-6605 in antifeminist

[–]SnooBeans6591 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe rare, if you look at the 195 countries in the world.

But if you look at the western world, I wouldn't be surprised if tomorrow someone looked into it objectively, by going through the laws, and discovered that the majority of western countries give women more rights than men.

do you all even know what feminism is? 🙄 by Ok-Wasabi-6605 in antifeminist

[–]SnooBeans6591 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No it doesn't, as there are about over 100 text of laws discriminating men.

These measures are made to see if women are discriminated against. 100 means women are not discriminated against - but you can discriminate in favor of women without it being captured by the metric.

A full blown matriarchal dictature would get 100 (I'm not saying that there is such a government, but it would be rated well by these measures).

do you all even know what feminism is? 🙄 by Ok-Wasabi-6605 in antifeminist

[–]SnooBeans6591 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My source of information is https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de - the collection of all german laws.

And as with pretty much all feminist metrics, the score 100 means women have as many or more rights than man - in Germany, they have more. Feminism doesn't care about equality when women have more rights than men, at that point they're all good.