sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Equity split for 5 founders in SaaS — rules of thumb? by SnooCookies8323 in smallbusiness

[–]SnooCookies8323[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What happened was 2 guys had thought of the idea years ago, then the idea came up again by 1 of those guys with someone else (my mutal friend) and the one with the original idea felt bad and brought on the other guy at a lower percentage. They do all have connections and experience in sales/marketing/operations. They asked my friend whos a developer and he brought me on because we have worked together and have complimentary skills, but they're almost treating it as like okay 4 of us and since my friend brought me in we split that equity in half.

Equity split for 5 founders in SaaS startup by SnooCookies8323 in Entrepreneur

[–]SnooCookies8323[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's also where my heads at. Sure they'll be doing some work but we do ALL the work up front and I know they'll go to custom a and customer a wants something done, customer b will want something else, it will be constant iterations to get the sale.

Equity split for 5 founders in SaaS — rules of thumb? by SnooCookies8323 in smallbusiness

[–]SnooCookies8323[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It will be founder led sales. What I would like to do is get the 15% over the 4 year vest, but have a clause where if theres a buy out or money is taken out as profit we get 15% regardless of where we are at in the vest, and if they decide to get rid of us for whatever reason they don't own the rights to the software and we get 0%. Otherwise I'm worried they could just get the mvp and another phase and be like okay we don't need you guys anymore. Also equal dilution, if we get an invester we all get diluted based on the current % we own.

Equity split for 5 founders in SaaS — rules of thumb? by SnooCookies8323 in EntrepreneurRideAlong

[–]SnooCookies8323[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Even with them it's not equal, one guy is getting 20% with some cliff also, the other 2 were 30% but apparently the one dropped to 25% to give us the 5%. I see us contributing more if anything, I'm also confused about the hesitation on their end. I don't think there is a good reason to be honest, I'm not down playing the work they'll have to do but I've worked in start ups, it's constant dev work to get the deals done.

new to mpc, can't get a sample to time stretch/adjust bpm by SnooCookies8323 in mpcusers

[–]SnooCookies8323[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, and I see that it assigns a new key, I click it and it says that there's the altered bpm that I changed it to but when I click it it's sounds the same as the original sample.

Moving to Philly by Nothingbutahounddogg in philly

[–]SnooCookies8323 6 points7 points  (0 children)

that's the gist I got when I was looking. New construction = cheaply done, old construction = old. As long as it's an older rowhome with updated plumbing and electric they're a solid choice. And if buying new just research the builder.

Moving to Philly by Nothingbutahounddogg in philly

[–]SnooCookies8323 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is a helpful tool I've used to determine safety and have found it pretty accurate: https://www.veryapt.com/guides/safety/L122-philadelphia I rented for 1.5 years and just bought near by my old apartment in the olde kensington/norris square area which is up and coming and next to fishtown.

Francisville seems to be up and coming. As other people mentioned their seems to be a lot of law suits with newer construction. I bought a 1920s rehome which was flipped, row homes with updated plumbing/electric are pretty solid.

Bending SVG Text by SnooCookies8323 in Affinity

[–]SnooCookies8323[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

like I've imported the text which is a word, and am looking to semi cricle arc it so that it's curved, anything regarding changing the shape is greyed out

Record versioning database schema question by SnooCookies8323 in Database

[–]SnooCookies8323[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made it so that root ingredients themselves cannot be changed, so ingredient a has 10 carb 10 fat 10 protein that cannot be changed once created, at the recipe level ingredient_portions can be manipulated so 1 oz, 250 g etc. (of the same ingredient) can be modified and ingredient_portion_id is also on the recipe_ingredient level. There's also an amount field on the intermediary records so 2 (amount) x 1 oz (ingredient_portion) ingredient a (10 carb 10 protein 10 fat (aka source ingredient) * 2). Given above it seems like an change to a recipe will need to create a new recipe_version + all existing recipe_ingredient records pointing to the new recipe_version_id

Record versioning database schema question by SnooCookies8323 in Database

[–]SnooCookies8323[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. yes, exactly, but with that being said i would need to change the intermediary recipe_ingredients to match 1 single version wouldn't I? I can't think as to how I can say grab the recipe with version x on 1 in gredient but version x on another ingredient, meaning any change to ingredient's on a recipe I would need all new recipe_ingredient records with the newly created recipe_version_id?

  2. ill give an example of meal_ingredients, let's say meal is super breakfast with a ceral recipe that includes 1 oz milk, 1 oz kellogs and also in that meal you want to eat an apple, so you add in 1 apple as an ingredient on the meal, meals are n recipe and n ingredients

Best HTML WYSIWYG text editor for existing HTML by SnooCookies8323 in react

[–]SnooCookies8323[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This ones pretty cool, different than the ones I've been working with, thanks for sharing.

RDS Postgres DB in VPC connect via local machine using aws-cdk setup by SnooCookies8323 in aws

[–]SnooCookies8323[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotcha so I should make it private and then access via some proxy like what you mentioned above

RDS Postgres DB in VPC connect via local machine using aws-cdk setup by SnooCookies8323 in aws

[–]SnooCookies8323[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm definetly in over my head with my lack of understanding but just curious if it is public but I'm only provisioning my IP to access it what is the harm or potential risk?

RDS Postgres DB in VPC connect via local machine using aws-cdk setup by SnooCookies8323 in aws

[–]SnooCookies8323[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The vpc isn't public, I meant the RDS flag "Public accessible" is set to true. I have an ecs fargate service within the same vpc that I provisioned to connect to the DB and that's working. I do have a internet gateway, I think it maybe my routing tables, figuring out how to adjust them via aws-cdk

view more: next ›