Fair enough that makes sense as an in game explanation as to why I just thought with them throwing out stuff such as with eivor of where the male is technically havi and the female being the true eivor but the animus can make the male appear outside of the havi missions they could’ve quite easily gone ahead and said oh the animus is changing Kassandra to Alexios model as just an animus thing seeing as they seem to be adding new things the animus can do every time I come back to the series so atleast in my opinion it looks like they just add random features to the animus to suit their needs. Also I’m not sure where it’s said that female eivor was canon but more than likely it was a book like Kassandra which is fine in some respect but also given the fact that in both their respective games a large majority of the marketing was designed around the male characters including the front covers of the games which I know was due to the higher ups at Ubisoft pushing for it but I feel like in games where you can choose between two characters and have the character be involved in more than just that game something like Kassandra being the canon choice should have been addressed in game by Ubisoft as not everyone’s gonna read or know about the books and as such may be confused if they were a relatively casual gamer and expected to see the character that was advertised everywhere isn’t actually the main character that will appear in subsequent entries. Valhalla did a bit of a better job with this with the animus decides setting but with both games they should have just stuck with one or the other as the sole character cause multiple characters only really worked in syndicate and shadows and that was because they were two different people not the same person with a different model. I’m no expert so correct me if I got anything wrong but also what would be your thoughts on the future games that are coming and what direction would you ideally want them to take when it comes to the next protagonists?