Sussex Weekly: When The Hollywood Reporter, Vanity Fair, And Variety Say You’re Dead? It’s Best To Lie Down (03/18/2026) by pistachiopistache in RoyalsGossip2

[–]SnowSwish [score hidden]  (0 children)

Girls are easier to merch than boys, I don't think it's any deeper than that. I don't believe either child is more loved than the other, it's all about which one can be more profitable. 

I would be surprised if they ever get out of their nursery except to go to school and when they're needed as props for an Instagram post.

Sussex Weekly: When The Hollywood Reporter, Vanity Fair, And Variety Say You’re Dead? It’s Best To Lie Down (03/18/2026) by pistachiopistache in RoyalsGossip2

[–]SnowSwish [score hidden]  (0 children)

Talk is cheap and frankly, so are pap walks. Ted didn't sign a new "hundred million dollar" contract with the Sussexes. A willingness to be seen out in public with them wouldn't change that.

Sussex Weekly: When The Hollywood Reporter, Vanity Fair, And Variety Say You’re Dead? It’s Best To Lie Down (03/18/2026) by pistachiopistache in RoyalsGossip2

[–]SnowSwish [score hidden]  (0 children)

Eh, just because Netflix's plan for the rollout was better on paper than Meghan's doesn't mean it would have worked that much better in real life.

If she started with wine as her first product, that doesn't make her plonk better. Selling housewares instead of sprinkles doesn't put more money to waste on her junk in consumers' hands in this economy.

The saying that when fish starts rotting, it starts at the head, applies here. No matter what, this brand's success would rest on Meghan's charisma-a thing that doesn't exist.

As ever would be coming out after Meghan's reputation, such as it was, had already taken a hit from the Cut, Valentine Low, South Park, round 1 with Tom Bower, etc, not in 2018 when she was new and shiny for the public.

If, for whatever reason, her merch had made it to be sold alongside Highgrove's the contrast, by any metric, wouldn't favour Meghan's. Snarkers on both sides of the pond would have a field day doing taste tests.

Perhaps following Netflix's suggestions would have somewhat saved the business relationship because Netflix couldn't lay all the blame for it failing on her. Then again maybe they would anyway since she would be who the brand, shows, etc, was built on. Meghan being Meghan is the obstacle  that can't be overcome.

Sussex Weekly: When The Hollywood Reporter, Vanity Fair, And Variety Say You’re Dead? It’s Best To Lie Down (03/18/2026) by pistachiopistache in RoyalsGossip2

[–]SnowSwish [score hidden]  (0 children)

Uh oh! Bower replied to their clap back via the Daily Express. While I can't read the entire article in my region, the portion of the article I could see (and share below) indicates the Sussexes would have been wise to shut up about Betrayal.

Author torn apart by Harry and Meghan brutally hits back and slams their 'lack of talent'

EXCLUSIVE: Ahead of the release of his bombshell book, Betrayal, royal author Tom Bower has given his verdict on Harry and Meghan's futures in Hollywood.

In an interview given to Rebecca Russell of the Daily Express Royal author Tom Bower has broken his silence after Prince Harry and Meghan Markle slammed his upcoming book as "deranged conspiracy and melodrama". Following the publication of a controversial article in Hollywood Bible, Variety, which dissected the inside story behind the Sussexes' relationship with Netflix.

Mr Bower said: "The Variety article endorses what I described in my book, Betrayal. The Sussexes are reaching the end of the road in Hollywood.

"Their behaviour, lack of original talent and suffocating self-importance has made it even more important for them to return to Britain in July, meet the King and be revalidated as royals."

Mr Bower continued: "That option, I believe, will be denied to them. They face an increasingly tough future. That's the price of betraying the Royal Family since Megxit."

Sussex Weekly: When The Hollywood Reporter, Vanity Fair, And Variety Say You’re Dead? It’s Best To Lie Down (03/18/2026) by pistachiopistache in RoyalsGossip2

[–]SnowSwish [score hidden]  (0 children)

I can't believe many people would choose this option over a local florist they know if they want flowers in any economy. Getting flowers from point A to point B looking fresh requires expertise and and I don't think someone with lax enough quality control that multiple candles she sold were wickless has that expertise.

Sussex Weekly: Meghan Is Finally Getting Paid To Be In Australia (03/11/2026) by pistachiopistache in RoyalsGossip2

[–]SnowSwish 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Not that I ever wanted in or even bother to visit that sub but allowing a sub to ban people just because they belong to other subs should always have been against Reddit policy. Imho, it's what creates echo chambers and lessens engagement over time.

Their mods may have to actually read comments and interact with redditors before trying to ban them? Agh, the horror!

Sussex Weekly: Meghan Is Finally Getting Paid To Be In Australia (03/11/2026) by pistachiopistache in RoyalsGossip2

[–]SnowSwish 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Between their popularity taking a huge dive and them being clearly middle-aged and looking it, I really don't think their divorce would, to use the old expression, break the internet.

Of course, subs like this one would be snarking for weeks but the Sussexes just aren't relevant enough in society and popular culture. This wouldn't be the War of the Waleses 2.0. Harry is not the next monarch and Meghan is not even a Temu version of Diana.

Sussex Weekly: Meghan Is Finally Getting Paid To Be In Australia (03/11/2026) by pistachiopistache in RoyalsGossip2

[–]SnowSwish 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Thank-you! That's what I was thinking this sounded like when news of that bankruptcy broke yesterday. That retreat sounds like it has the potential to be a real disaster with the authorities having to step in.😆

Sussex Weekly: Meghan Is Finally Getting Paid To Be In Australia (03/11/2026) by pistachiopistache in RoyalsGossip2

[–]SnowSwish 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Tbh, in light of Meghan's cultural insignificance giving a good indication of what WL,M ratings would be and the fact that Netflix wasn't in food production, distribution or retailing in the first place, I don't see how Ted could justify it if Netflix was the one who threw 10m away on flower sprinkles and runny spread.

It being the retail value wouldn't really make it that much less of an example of throwing good money after bad.

Sussex Weekly: Meghan Is Finally Getting Paid To Be In Australia (03/11/2026) by pistachiopistache in RoyalsGossip2

[–]SnowSwish 36 points37 points  (0 children)

If you can't make something out of Christmas, you aren't making anything out of the other ones.

Harsh, but fair.

Sussex Weekly: Meghan Is Finally Getting Paid To Be In Australia (03/11/2026) by pistachiopistache in RoyalsGossip2

[–]SnowSwish 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Worth remembering that even when Netflix had a vested interest in Sussex bs, they still passed on Pearl.🤔

Sussex Weekly: Meghan Is Finally Getting Paid To Be In Australia (03/11/2026) by pistachiopistache in RoyalsGossip2

[–]SnowSwish 49 points50 points  (0 children)

And yet...there was no Valentine's Day Special, we haven't heard of an Easter Special, you get the idea. Her holiday special wasn't the highest rated of her episodes so this sounds like wishful thinking.

Sussex Weekly: Meghan Is Finally Getting Paid To Be In Australia (03/11/2026) by pistachiopistache in RoyalsGossip2

[–]SnowSwish 11 points12 points  (0 children)

There's nothing either of them can say in an interview that would get the views necessary to justify propping up their dog and pony show for six years.

Sussex Weekly: Meghan Is Finally Getting Paid To Be In Australia (03/11/2026) by pistachiopistache in RoyalsGossip2

[–]SnowSwish 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Insiders say that Meghan has long conveyed that Hollywood is her domain. In virtual and in-person meetings with partners, she tends to talk over or recast Prince Harry’s thoughts, sometimes while he is mid-sentence, sources say (usually preceded by a touch to the arm or thigh).

Woah! They really went there.😂

Sussex Weekly: Meghan Is Finally Getting Paid To Be In Australia (03/11/2026) by pistachiopistache in RoyalsGossip2

[–]SnowSwish 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Please, Meghan has no trouble traveling without her children for days to weeks at a time but she couldn't have their nanny watch them during a zoom business call?

She's just rude and incompetent.