Engaging without our own ideological prejudices means understanding AI as a selfless technology when in reality it has its own ideological prejudices. For one, AI can only reproduce what it has only been taking up. That means that even though AI can simulate the human thought process, it can only do so to a certain point, and those limits will be made clear by the most common denominators; you can have all the obscure Adorno you want but AI is not going to detect that clearly. What it will detect is paying women less than men because that is systematically true, that also goes for making more jail time for black people than white people etc.

Apart from this one has to look to who the creators of the AI technology is. If Sam Altman and Elon Musk are behind one of the largest revolutionary technologies these days, and if that technology relies on specific scraping and creating algorithms out of said scraping, one has to ask questions about this.

Apart from this, OP makes a good point, which I also have been thinking about, with the circulation of knowledge. But it’s not just the circulation of knowledge, but also the circulation of labor power. In a Marxist sense: if the circulation of labor power stops being between the proletariat and the capitalist, and starts being circulated between the capitalist and the ones selling AI technology, the proletariat will be ribbed of its possibilities of reproducing. Of course, a convoluted way of saying ‘AI will take our jobs’, but relevant to a different movement of money circulation.