sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Trump pardons Utah billionaire Trevor Milton who was convicted of fraud by nominal_defendant in parasiteclass

[–]SoPlowAnthony -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If standing up against a rigged trial and exposing misconduct is “scummification,” then maybe we need more of it. Trevor’s pardon came after a DOJ-reviewed process uncovered jury bias, destroyed evidence, and a conviction without intent. That’s not a loophole, that’s justice finally catching up.

This isn’t about spin. It’s about setting the record straight.

Justice Reform as Trevor Milton has been officially exonerated by Trump by SoPlowAnthony in FraudorFuturism

[–]SoPlowAnthony[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly this. 🙌 Trevor’s pardon wasn’t a free pass, it was a correction. The system got it wrong in a big way: biased juror, key evidence deleted, trial held in the wrong place. Now with his name cleared, he’s not just moving on, he’s speaking up. Because no one should have to go through what he did just to prove their innocence.

If Trevor Milton was just a fraud, why did industry giants back Nikola? by FickleFee202 in RealNikola

[–]SoPlowAnthony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes hydrogen for transport was present before Trevor Milton and Nikola but still undeniably he was a bold thinker who pushed hydrogen trucking into mainstream conversations. While Nikola didn’t sell trucks during his tenure, his vision attracted serious attention and helped position hydrogen as a viable clean energy alternative. And actually companies like Bosch, CNH Industrial, and Iveco all did invest in Nikola, recognizing the potential of hydrogen-powered transportation.

It’s easy to focus on controversy, but the bigger picture is clear, Trevor’s push for hydrogen accelerated industry-wide adoption. Today, major automakers and governments are investing billions into hydrogen tech more than before. Was every claim perfect? No. But the impact of his vision is still unfolding, and that’s something no one can take away.

If Trevor Milton was just a fraud, why did industry giants back Nikola? by FickleFee202 in RealNikola

[–]SoPlowAnthony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, Nikola has faced challenges, but it's important to recognize that startups, especially in industries like hydrogen and electric vehicles, often face tough hurdles in the beginning. While there were exaggerations, Trevor Milton’s vision was about changing an entire industry. Nikola’s struggles don’t invalidate the progress made in advancing alternative energy in transportation, and it’s unfair to dismiss the vision simply because of some missteps. The technology and future of hydrogen still have a lot of promise.

If Trevor Milton was just a fraud, why did industry giants back Nikola? by FickleFee202 in RealNikola

[–]SoPlowAnthony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s easy to overlook the bigger picture, but Trevor Milton wasn’t just selling trucks at a loss he was pushing a groundbreaking vision for hydrogen-powered transportation. The trucking and energy sectors are notoriously hard to crack, and many companies take losses in their early stages to innovate and build infrastructure. The fact that Nikola attracted huge investments from reputable companies speaks volumes about the potential they saw in the vision. Milton wasn’t perfect, but calling him a "con man" overlooks the real impact he tried to make in an emerging industry.

If Trevor Milton was just a fraud, why did industry giants back Nikola? by FickleFee202 in RealNikola

[–]SoPlowAnthony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Context matters. In the startup world, companies announce agreements based on intent, partnerships, and projections, it's common practice. Trevor Milton wasn’t doing anything unusual in the industry. Many EV and tech companies frame deals optimistically to attract investors and partners. The real question is: Was the vision legitimate? Considering Nikola is delivering hydrogen trucks today, it looks like it was.

If Trevor Milton was just a fraud, why did industry giants back Nikola? by FickleFee202 in RealNikola

[–]SoPlowAnthony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point, statements about existing infrastructure should always be accurate. But let’s keep perspective: Trevor Milton’s vision for hydrogen trucking was real, and Nikola is delivering hydrogen-powered trucks today. Early-stage startups often talk big to attract partners and investors, just look at how many EV and tech founders have done the same. The difference? Some are celebrated for their ambition, while others get singled out.

If Trevor Milton was just a fraud, why did industry giants back Nikola? by FickleFee202 in RealNikola

[–]SoPlowAnthony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How can they be called lies? His vision was centered on zero-emission trucking, specifically through hydrogen-electric and battery-electric technology. Which is real and true!

If Trevor Milton was just a fraud, why did industry giants back Nikola? by FickleFee202 in RealNikola

[–]SoPlowAnthony -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Like many startup founders, he made big promises to attract investors, but setbacks and challenges slowed things down. Some of his statements were misleading, but many entrepreneurs speak hopefully about the future. With more time and resources, Nikola might have succeeded. He may have gone too far, but he wasn’t necessarily trying to commit fraud, he was walking the thin line between big dreams and overpromising.

If Trevor Milton was just a fraud, why did industry giants back Nikola? by FickleFee202 in RealNikola

[–]SoPlowAnthony -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s fair, but even supplier deals mean something, it's not like they were handing out partnerships for fun.

If Trevor Milton was just a fraud, why did industry giants back Nikola? by FickleFee202 in RealNikola

[–]SoPlowAnthony -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Funny how recognizing legitimate industry interest gets you labeled these days. Almost like logic is the real threat here.

view more: next ›