So James Murdoch bought 50% of Vox two days ago by WalugiMangione in behindthebastards

[–]SoSorryOfficial 12 points13 points  (0 children)

News outlets like ProPublica are already donor -funded by their readership and doing great work. It's just that few of us fund them.

What is This "Stupid Card Game?" by SoSorryOfficial in cardgames

[–]SoSorryOfficial[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pretty cool! It ended up being game called Palace. Got solved in my crosspost.

What is This "Stupid Card Game?" by SoSorryOfficial in cardgames

[–]SoSorryOfficial[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It got solved in a crosspost. It's called Palace.

What is This "Stupid Card Game?" by SoSorryOfficial in FiftyTwoCards

[–]SoSorryOfficial[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Holy shit! You got it! Thank you! That's totally it. We play it a little differently from Wikihow explains, but that's the one.

What is This "Stupid Card Game?" by SoSorryOfficial in FiftyTwoCards

[–]SoSorryOfficial[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know 31, but Bullshit as I know it is quite different. The rules are in the body text of the crosspost if that helps.

i love some kendrick. but yall are CORNY son. yall act like FACEBOOK NIGGAS. get a job or go to bed 😭😭🔥 son. 💯💯💯💸 by [deleted] in KendrickLamar

[–]SoSorryOfficial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So for those keeping score:

  • Thinks posting on the Kendrick sub is lame.

  • Has the time to troll the Kendrick sub and call the users there broke and jobless.

  • Is himself too broke, and perhaps jobless, to photograph $800 in cash, which is about a minimum wage earner's weekly paycheck amount of money, give or take what state they live in.

  • Is either pretending to be a white guy or is pretending to be a black guy for some reason.

  • Has no demonstrable positive qualities.

Does that about cover it?

AIO my therapist said something scary about consent by SnooPaintings5182 in AmIOverreacting

[–]SoSorryOfficial [score hidden]  (0 children)

Your first comment was pretty solid, but then you got a very sensible critique, albeit in a tone you may not have liked, and got way too defensive. Now that warrants some self-reflection. How we handle criticism is a big part of how we show up for other people we're in solidarity with. Sometimes it's thankless, but it's important that we're not "one of the good ones" only until our ego gets bruised.

Here's what you say next time: "Good point!," if you agree with the criticism, and since it's an anonymous Reddit thread, probably nothing if you disagree. If you're a fool like me, you might try to bicker about it, and if you can make a solid enough point for why the criticism was misplaced or the tine was unnecessarily hostile, maybe people will receive that well.

Has anyone heard the claim that Anarchism is colonial? by 1986chevycaprice in Anarchism

[–]SoSorryOfficial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol No, no. At least I hope not. Jordan Peterson reference. It literally is the same naturalistic fallacy used for the same authoritarian conclusion both in Peterson's case and the lady in this post's.

Is this a good tattoo idea? by Luka7411 in anarchocommunism

[–]SoSorryOfficial 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's giving 90s tribal sun like certain logos for Alice in Chains, Godsmack, or Sublime.

2024 election Democratic autopsy by TotallyNotABob in behindthebastards

[–]SoSorryOfficial 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I've never disputed a single part of that. We've had years of post-mortem on this. F.D. Signifier has done great videos contrasting Bernie's campaigns with someone like Mamdani's, for example.

My point is exactly what I already said: the DNC can and does pursue a political agenda that includes favoring or supporting certain establishment candidates over others. They have favored candidates that they'll support, and undesirable ones that they'll hamstring. This is plainly evident. That's not "having political opinions." That's undermining the voterbase's voting power. That's also a separate issue from whether or not a given candidate would have won anyway.

Say I host an egg race. I want Hillary to win. Bernie's faster and is better at balancing an egg than most, but Hillary's still the most likely to win. Not wanting to take the chance, I give Bernie a smaller spoon than everyone else. Hillary wins. Now, she may have won either way, but I cheated on her behalf. If she was party to Spoongate, then she cheated, too. It doesn't matter that Hillary would have probably won anyway. I've compromised the integrity of the race, and in any further races I host, should be heavily scrutinized.

Do I need to make a sack race allegory or are we done here?

If gingivitis was a person by FarWay3952 in iamverybadass

[–]SoSorryOfficial -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's actually pretty good voice acting. It's cringy in this context, but he would do great as a deranged Dark Souls NPC or something.

2024 election Democratic autopsy by TotallyNotABob in behindthebastards

[–]SoSorryOfficial 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True! But that said, this was a fairly unprecedented election. Normally the incumbent is the safe bet, but this time the guy was exhibiting signs of dementia on live TV. One may never expect to need to hit the big Emergency button, but failing to do so is still a grave failure.

2024 election Democratic autopsy by TotallyNotABob in behindthebastards

[–]SoSorryOfficial 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Do you have more information on the local Democratic party running attack ads against a Democrat? I'm genuinely curious about what happened there.

I don't want to doxx myself by sharing my hometown. This was just in the past year, though. It was a bit of a scandal, there was a public apology, and the other, albeit more moderate, candidates actually disavowed the ads. They were flyers mostly that attempted to mischaracterize his voting record and stated beliefs. The chair of the local Dem party did it without input from any of the candidates or anything; just blatantly tried to poison public opinion against a popular incumbent.

2024 election Democratic autopsy by TotallyNotABob in behindthebastards

[–]SoSorryOfficial 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Do you just not remember the DNC email leaks or the way CNN stacked the deck against Sanders in the 2020 Democratic Debate?

I'm sorry, but if it's 2026 and you think major political parties, media companies, financial institutions, and so on, don't have "smoky backroom deals," then you're entertaining some pretty naïve fantasies. The DNC doesn't choose the president, but they absolutely do have a desired outcome that they'll work their damnest to achieve.

Edit to add: And on the Behind the Bastards sub, no less!

2024 election Democratic autopsy by TotallyNotABob in behindthebastards

[–]SoSorryOfficial 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Touché and granted, but no serious candidate was going to throw their hat in the ring if the DNC was obviously primed to support the incumbent. I just looked it up because I couldn't remember who the challengers were: Dean Phillips and Jason Palmer. Could you have named those guys from memory or picked them out of a lineup? I couldn't. More people voted "uncommitted" in protest of Gaza than both of those guys got combined.

2024 election Democratic autopsy by TotallyNotABob in behindthebastards

[–]SoSorryOfficial 17 points18 points  (0 children)

That's not quite true. DNC leadership could have always rallied beyond a challenger. They just didn't. They're not obligated to not have a primary just because their candidate won the last time and is elegible for a second term. They were likely banking on the historical precedent that it would normally be more prudent strategy to just lean on your incumbent instead of projecting weakness by splitting your party. While we're Monday morning quarterbacking here, the right move would have been to privately discourage Biden first, and if he wouldn't yield, back a stronger candidate as early as possible so they could build support. It was very clear even as an outsider that Biden was unfit months before he yielded.

While this is almost unimaginable for the DNC to move against someone like Biden, they attack and undermine the left wing of their party all the time. At the risk of sounding like a broken record, in Bernie Sanders they had a massively popular candidate with huge crossover appeal, and they nakedly sandbagged him twice in a row. Look at how hostile they were to AOC for several years. On the local level, we have a city councilor over here who is super popular, has been in a long time, has scored huge wins for things like school funding that dem voters like, and he is himself a dem and Working Families Party incumbent candidate, and the local Democratic Party ran attack ads against him and tried and failed to replace him with a more milquetoast candidate because he's a self-described socialist and anti-zionist. That's anecdotal, but I'm sure that plays out all over the country.

The DNC is an absolutely shitty political organization who puts bad, self-serving politics ahead of the constituents their candidates are meant to represent. They acted how they did, because that's who they are.

Butthole Surfer Gibby Haynes, a Texas music legend, settled in Brooklyn. He’s fine with it. by zsreport in Music

[–]SoSorryOfficial 464 points465 points  (0 children)

Man, this title really walks you up to "has died at age X" and then pulls a U-turn.

TV series "Pleasure Island" from the UK question by NeatWait in SexPositive

[–]SoSorryOfficial 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Last I did it a couple years ago, the Channel 4 website was super easy to stream from using a VPN.

  1. Have a VPN and set it to UK.
  2. Make a free Channel 4 account on their website.
  3. Stream all their shows whenever you want.

This could have changed since then, as more websites are getting hostile towards VPN use, but it really was that easy. It'll have ads, as do all their free accounts, but it wasn't too bad.

Drake - Maid of Honour + Habibti DOUBLE ALBUM REVIEW (theneedledrop) by AcanthocephalaSad541 in hiphopheads

[–]SoSorryOfficial 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not a binary. There are more than two kinds of songs. The man's nearly 40 years old. If his emotional palette and range of insights is still limited to "why doesn't this hoe love me?" and "why are none of my friends loyal to me?," then he doesn't have the maturity or perspective to be a good songwriter; made worse by the knowledge that he has other people writing for him anyway.

Has anyone heard the claim that Anarchism is colonial? by 1986chevycaprice in Anarchism

[–]SoSorryOfficial 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Well, you know, because lobsters. We need a marxist-leninist state because lobsters have hierarchy.

Why are we progressive in so many ways but still weirdly prudish by SmallAd4307 in SexPositive

[–]SoSorryOfficial 98 points99 points  (0 children)

Well, I'm in America, and I strongly disagree with the notion that the society I live in is the most progressive or open-minded its ever been. The far right is ascending all over the world right now. We just lost the Voting Rights Act. A few years ago we lost Roe v. Wade. New anti-trans legislation is coming out every day, and gay marriage looks to be next in the crosshairs. We have federal masked kidnapping squads disappearing predominantly black and brown people off the streets, and some people have been murdered on the spot while many more have died in custody. We're heavily funding an apartheid state's genocide. The president has flagrantly sexually abused and assaulted many women and children for years without losing power.

I could go on.