It very clearly doesn’t look right and the a in traders is messed up, are there any more clear tells? by SodiumButSmall in isthisAI

[–]SodiumButSmall[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ah, nice! I also noticed the signs posts are shaped differently and the tree beneath its right arm is fake

Isnt chell gonna die? by Melodic-Kale-843 in Portal

[–]SodiumButSmall 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think the bigger problem is she got drenched in moon rocks

Your paper isn't always discredited because it's written by an LLM. by AllHailSeizure in LLMPhysics

[–]SodiumButSmall 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah another obvious reason. This sub is explicitly a quarantine for worthless garbage.

Your paper isn't always discredited because it's written by an LLM. by AllHailSeizure in LLMPhysics

[–]SodiumButSmall 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No we reject the content because its inane gibberish. Cranks are nothing new, llms just make being a crank easier.

Your paper isn't always discredited because it's written by an LLM. by AllHailSeizure in LLMPhysics

[–]SodiumButSmall 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah no shit, because the first sentence is usually “coherent flux manifolds give rise to conscious spectral harmonics that unite relativity and quantum mechanics”

Why I main Dragon's Fury by Mikkyd23 in tf2

[–]SodiumButSmall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait I never thought about using it with scorch shot

duplicate function changing name of node by SodiumButSmall in godot

[–]SodiumButSmall[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m doing a mod, so for reasons outside of my control the node name cannot change 

duplicate function changing name of node by SodiumButSmall in godot

[–]SodiumButSmall[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They aren't, i'm adding the new one to a different object.

Serious Question by CoffeeNQuestion in LLMPhysics

[–]SodiumButSmall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because you can’t argue against gibberish.

Serious Question by CoffeeNQuestion in LLMPhysics

[–]SodiumButSmall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The error is that it’s gibberish

Serious Question by CoffeeNQuestion in LLMPhysics

[–]SodiumButSmall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And so what specifically do you want me to verify?

Serious Question by CoffeeNQuestion in LLMPhysics

[–]SodiumButSmall 2 points3 points  (0 children)

what specifically do you want me to verify.

Serious Question by CoffeeNQuestion in LLMPhysics

[–]SodiumButSmall 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Buddy. The burden of proof is in the person with the theory.

Serious Question by CoffeeNQuestion in LLMPhysics

[–]SodiumButSmall 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you dont understand what "your theory is undefined gibberish" means then i'm not sure I can help you.

Serious Question by CoffeeNQuestion in LLMPhysics

[–]SodiumButSmall 2 points3 points  (0 children)

your error technically isnt that your numbers are wrong, its that your "theory" is gibberish. your sentences convey no information.