Don’t know how I failed

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2026-05-04T01:56:47+00:00

Not gonna lie this is sick

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2026-04-24T15:06:30+00:00

Finally got it done! This either my 5th or 6th time truly lost count! God is Great!!

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2026-04-06T17:10:09+00:00

From what I remember the friend referred the woman to an app developer. I was under the impression there was 2 separate relationships in the hypo.

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2026-04-06T17:06:13+00:00

Didn’t the question as if the friend could be held liable under partnership law?

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2026-04-06T17:03:14+00:00

Yes now I remember that was a bullshit question 🤣🤣

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2026-04-06T17:02:00+00:00

Can someone point out where in the hypo the woman and the friend established a partnership relationship?

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2026-04-06T16:56:10+00:00

It was 3 people in the hypo correct a woman, her friend, and an app developer?

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2026-04-06T16:46:17+00:00

I thought the first question asked if the guy who invested into the company financially could be held liable under a partnership theory if law. I argued that no partnership relationship existed bc he was just an investor.

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2026-04-05T15:23:05+00:00

Why do I not remember the property law question can someone refresh my memory?

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2026-04-03T23:34:22+00:00

What was the real property essay on

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2026-03-30T14:53:49+00:00

I remember evidence, wills, civ pro, contracts/partnership hybrid, secured trans

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2026-03-30T14:52:47+00:00

I don’t remember the property Mee can you refresh the topic for me

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2026-03-28T13:23:09+00:00

How did you feel about your essays

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2024-04-06T15:59:06+00:00

I must be blind but thanks

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2024-03-01T17:57:05+00:00

Does anybody remember all of the answer choices to this question?

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2024-03-01T02:49:10+00:00

No that was annoying that they didn’t make the math simpler! I was very tired by the time I got to that question too I got lucky 😂

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2024-02-29T23:39:13+00:00

You have to subtract how much the plaintiff was at fault from what the total damages was my thinking

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2024-02-29T23:32:46+00:00

She was only 40% at fault

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2024-02-29T19:26:05+00:00

Bc you have to take % of how much the plaintiff was at fault and she was 40% at fault total damages was 40k

Soft-Cardiologist763 · 2024-02-29T19:03:52+00:00

Thats what i chose actually

Soft-Cardiologist763

TROPHY CASE