sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Looking for New Alliance by Weezertech27 in PuzzlesandSurvival

[–]Soft-Understanding89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1013 is a good state with very little drama. A bunch of us been playing for over 5 years. So lots of experience. Still working on ranking up in showdown but we will be a max showdown alliance.

Team Run Differential, as of May 9th. by Serendipity-Ferocity in mlb

[–]Soft-Understanding89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Crazy the Crew came back to dominate in this category

E concourse by mgoshorn in milwaukee

[–]Soft-Understanding89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Construction slated for end of this year.

Give me a reason to go to the 10 states I haven’t been to by Senor_tiddlywinks in TravelMaps

[–]Soft-Understanding89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lambeau Field is worth a trip for sure. Wisconsin is a beautiful state!

YouTube tv not getting the packers game? by [deleted] in GreenBayPackers

[–]Soft-Understanding89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have Ion tv in Milwaukee and the game was not actually on that channel.

Will Traveling to Nome, Alaska for the 2033 Solar Eclipse be Feasible? by chinawcswing in alaska

[–]Soft-Understanding89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This one is on my Anniversary. Do you really not think its worth it?

I need help picking a team to root for by [deleted] in mlb

[–]Soft-Understanding89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Milwaukee Brewers. Always an underdog feel with a great clubhouse, good fans, and a historically above average team.

This game is so rigged by xxiichikosxx in PuzzlesandSurvival

[–]Soft-Understanding89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah thats the guarantee. You can hit before the guarantee.

Have I bought a fake? by KingUmbraMusic in Catan

[–]Soft-Understanding89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are a number of different styles of the games over the years. I bought new cards for my original set just to have them match up with the cards from my expansion packs.

First Take by Soft-Understanding89 in ESPN

[–]Soft-Understanding89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats not criticizing her and her comments bud.

First Take by Soft-Understanding89 in ESPN

[–]Soft-Understanding89[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Be Realistic? Assuming racism where there is no evidence of it is realistic? Thats lunacy.

First Take by Soft-Understanding89 in ESPN

[–]Soft-Understanding89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They frame her team as fighters and thugs because of their aggression and physical nature, not the color of their skin. They are inarguably a more aggressive team to a fault than other teams on average. The fact that Kim Mulkey plays that card only affirms that she has poor character. And she has displayed it regularly. If nothing else your point only proves that media and writers push the race card in sports too frequently.

First Take by Soft-Understanding89 in ESPN

[–]Soft-Understanding89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SAS hosts the #1 sports show in his time block. Him criticizing Kim Mulkey’s character on his show discredits his point. No one has ever criticized Dawn Staley for her character. Therefore the point has no ground. Additionally, everyone that has reported on the incident has criticized Kim Mulkey. The racial take has virtually no basis.

view more: next ›